A scroll of mail from Pål Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sat, 21
Apr 2001 12:04:30 +0200
Read it? y
Rob wrote:
The
digital version, not due immediately, will be called the Pentax MR-52
What a weird and quite rotten name.
I'd guess they got a really bad fax of a press release and it's really
Could it be the MR-52 is an in-house product designation (like the
KB-numbers)and not a model name?
_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To
MZ3_fella _ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could it be the MR-52 is an in-house product designation (like the
KB-numbers)and not a model name?
Maybe the 5 is a poory written (or hastily read) S?
I don't know how a Z could possibly be mis-read as an R,
though!
-
This message is from the
Well if this is true, and Pentax sticks to their naming style of higher
numbers=lower model, we can expect so really advanced cameras if the new
digital is in the 50's, putting it about where the MZ-50 is...
Todd
At 12:04 PM 4/21/01 +0200, you wrote:
Rob wrote:
The
digital version, not due
Hi Team,
I picked up a copy of Australian Camera April 2000 today, there were a few
items worth relaying however I can't vouch for their accuracy, in the same
magazine I found the following quote from a Nikon advertorial "Pentax already
offers a 43mm f1.7 manual focus lens for the purists",
Rob wrote:
"The
digital version, not due immediately, will be called the Pentax MR-52"
What a weird and quite rotten name.
Pl
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax
Hi,
you can call it "Mister".
The -52 suggests that there are likely to be 52 (-0..-51) new flagships for
you to speculate about in the future, which should keep you out of
trouble :o)
---
Bob
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Saturday, April 21, 2001, 11:04:30 AM, you wrote:
Rob wrote:
"The
7 matches
Mail list logo
