It doesn't look so much that they trashed her over the fee, but because
they thought they could.
On 8/6/2017 6:28 PM, Mark C wrote:
Stumbled into this story this morning - a 21st century morality play
involving a photographer
*https://tinyurl.com/yclg86o8*
---
This email has been
Yeah. I've been following the story. They got what they contracted for
and then wanted to photographer to give them more at no extra charge.
Apparently she was only willing to go so far with that & it wasn't good
enough for the couple.
I think the judgment has already been appealed.
Anyone want
It seems the high rez images, though somewhat understated in the
article, were the real issue here. The extra cost of the album cover
photo was just a red herring that demands more public attention. Hi-rez
images are 21st century negs and you never easily give them up.
-p
On 8/6/2017 5:28
Stumbled into this story this morning - a 21st century morality play
involving a photographer
*https://tinyurl.com/yclg86o8*
---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
4 matches
Mail list logo
