Re: Peso: Stephanie

Why would the Dobo change his name if he were there, wouldn't he want to take advantage of the intimidation factor? Cotty wrote: > On 11/12/07, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed: > > >> Don't call me ashley. >> > > Roger. > > >> Good job. Very different from mine. >> In some way

Re: Peso: Stephanie

- Original Message - From: "Cotty" Subject: Re: Peso: Stephanie > I am honoured. We have much to discuss over a glass of wine one day. > It's gonna take more than a glass, I think. >> >>I found 3 B&W pictures that were sent to me a while back fro

Re: Peso: Stephanie

On 11/12/07, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed: >Don't call me ashley. Roger. > >Good job. Very different from mine. >In some ways I like your's better. I am honoured. We have much to discuss over a glass of wine one day. > >I found 3 B&W pictures that were sent to me a while back from

Re: Peso: Stephanie

- Original Message - From: "Cotty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "pentax list" ; "Subject: Re: Peso: Stephanie > Well, here ya go boss. Don't ask me what i did cos I've had some wine. > Well, rather a lot ashley. Have a look anyway > > &

Re: Peso: Stephanie

> > From: Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > She has a nice face. > > I'm on it. Mark! - Email sent from www.virginmedia.com/email Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software and scanned for spam -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mai

Re: Peso: Stephanie

On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 22:31:07 + Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well, here ya go boss. Don't ask me what i did cos I've had some wine. > Well, rather a lot ashley. Have a look anyway I thought it was Stephanie not Ashley? -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mail

Re: Peso: Stephanie

That's a very nice job. Cotty wrote: > Well, here ya go boss. Don't ask me what i did cos I've had some wine. > Well, rather a lot ashley. Have a look anyway > > > > -- The difference between individual intelligence and group intelligence is the

Re: Peso: Stephanie

Well, here ya go boss. Don't ask me what i did cos I've had some wine. Well, rather a lot ashley. Have a look anyway -- Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com __

Re: Peso: Stephanie

A few blemishes but I don't think that justifies taking a Gaussian blur brush to her entire face... Cotty wrote: > On 10/12/07, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed: > > >> Heck, have a go at it and bounce ot back to me onlist if you like. >> > > She has a nice face. > > I'm on it. >

Re: Peso: Stephanie

Cotty wrote: > > She has a nice face. > > I'm on it. > > MARK -- Christian http://photography.skofteland.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the

Re: Peso: Stephanie

On 10/12/07, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed: >Heck, have a go at it and bounce ot back to me onlist if you like. She has a nice face. I'm on it. -- Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com ___

Re: Peso: Stephanie

- Original Message - From: "Cotty" Subject: Re: Peso: Stephanie > > Thanks for explaining. The full res looks great. The nose is fine on > that - good luck with it. Do you mind if I have a go and bounce it back > to you off list? Heck, have a go at it an

Re: Peso: Stephanie

On 09/12/07, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed: >Thanks for all the replies. >I'm still trying to find a Photoshop softening technique for portraits that >I find acceptable, which is why I keep bouncing this stuff off the list. >The rendering of the nose seemed to be a cause for consternat

Re: Peso: Stephanie

Thanks for all the replies. I'm still trying to find a Photoshop softening technique for portraits that I find acceptable, which is why I keep bouncing this stuff off the list. The rendering of the nose seemed to be a cause for consternation with a few people. Note, this is not a DOF issue, or a

Re: Peso: Stephanie

On 06/12/07, Igor Roshchin, discombobulated, unleashed: >The out-of-focus nose is next in line. >Did you retouch it? I am surprised to see it this soft at f11. ***this* is what's bugging me. That 85 1.4 is one of the best lenses on the planet ever, right? But on the 1.5 sensor the DOF is jus

Re: Peso: Stephanie

Bill, I like both versions of the photo. Nice mood, very nice backdrop - it goes well with her hair and other colors (those play up in contrast), and it helps to tone down the shirt (or whatever it is). I am not bothered much by the makeup. The shadow on the right is a bit too deep to my taste,

Re: Peso: Stephanie

A kicker would have helped, but still, it is a shot that draws you in. -- Bruce Wednesday, December 5, 2007, 7:46:29 PM, you wrote: WR> I had a half hour of dead time towards the end of my day, she had about the WR> same before the start of her's. WR> Steph is one of our Santa photographers th

Re: Peso: Stephanie

On 05/12/07, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed: >http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/new/steph1.html > >K10, A*85mm/ f1.4, at f11. I shouldof used a kicker. >I really like the 85/1.4. i think the kicker would have helped. -- Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Plac

Re: Peso: Stephanie

On 05/12/07, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed: > >http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/new/steph1.html > >K10, A*85mm/ f1.4, at f11. I shouldof used a kicker. >I really like the 85/1.4. That is very nearly a cracking good shot. Something bothers me about it but I can't put my finger

Re: Peso: Stephanie

William Robb wrote: > - Original Message - > From: "Bob Sullivan" > Subject: Re: Peso: Stephanie >>> http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/new/steph1.html > >> Nice photo, nice looking girl, but I can't get past the eye makeup... > &g

Re: Peso: Stephanie

On Dec 5, 2007 10:46 PM, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I had a half hour of dead time towards the end of my day, she had about the > same before the start of her's. > Steph is one of our Santa photographers this year. > > http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/new/steph1.html > > K10

Re: Peso: Stephanie

I like them both Bill, maybe the colour shot a touch more. Dave On Dec 5, 2007 10:46 PM, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I had a half hour of dead time towards the end of my day, she had about the > same before the start of her's. > Steph is one of our Santa photographers this year. > >

Re: Peso: Stephanie

Very creamy skin texture! I like both renditions equally well. Walt On 12/5/07, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I had a half hour of dead time towards the end of my day, she had about the > same before the start of her's. > Steph is one of our Santa photographers this year. > > http://u

Re: Peso: Stephanie

On Wed, Dec 05, 2007 at 11:29:39PM -0600, William Robb wrote: > > - Original Message - > From: "Bob Sullivan" > Subject: Re: Peso: Stephanie > > > > Nice photo, nice looking girl, but I can't get past the eye makeup... > > You and me bot

Re: Peso: Stephanie

Nice photo, nice looking girl, but I can't get past the eye makeup... Regards, Bob S. On Dec 5, 2007 9:46 PM, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I had a half hour of dead time towards the end of my day, she had about the > same before the start of her's. > Steph is one of our Santa photog

Re: Peso: Stephanie

- Original Message - From: "Bob Sullivan" Subject: Re: Peso: Stephanie > Nice photo, nice looking girl, but I can't get past the eye makeup... You and me both. I just added a monochrome version to the page. Sometimes that helps with this sort of thing. Thanks for l

Peso: Stephanie

I had a half hour of dead time towards the end of my day, she had about the same before the start of her's. Steph is one of our Santa photographers this year. http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/new/steph1.html K10, A*85mm/ f1.4, at f11. I shouldof used a kicker. I really like the 85/1.4.