Re: Pesos For tje bords

I recognized "tje" as "the", because it's something I frequently get when I type too fast. "Bords" I read as "boards", as in "message boards", aka discussion groups. Sometimes the brain doesn't want to give you the word you want, so it made sense to me as "Pesos For the boards" (where boards =

Re: Pesos For tje bords

Successful hunt, Paul! The ISO 25,600 is, of course, VERY apparent. J - Original Message - From: "Paul Stenquist" <pnstenqu...@mac.com> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <pdml@pdml.net> Sent: Sunday, November 27, 2016 3:54:58 PM Subject: Pesos For tje

Re: Pesos For tje bords

For a second there, I was afraid you'd had a stroke. I understand your pain. At least Dave Brookes could probably decode what you typed with no problem... On 11/27/2016 7:10 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote: Good God, why don’t I read what I post before I hit send? The subject line was supposed to

RE: Pesos For tje bords

Paul Stenquist wrote: Went p ut late in the day with y K-1 trips, DF A 150-450. A 2Xs comforter and hot some little birds. The are pushed pretty hard, about ISO 25,600 and tight crops, but still fun to shoot. http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18315490=lg

Re: Pesos For tje bords

Subject: Re: Pesos For tje bords Good God, why don’t I read what I post before I hit send? The subject line was supposed to be “For the Birds.” Not very original but better than For tje bords. Where is autocorrect when I need it? The copy should have said, “I went out late in the day with my K-1

Re: Pesos For tje bords

Spot on focus even with the 2X convertor. Cute subjects also. -Original Message- >From: Paul Stenquist <pnstenqu...@mac.com> >Subject: Pesos For tje bords > >Went p ut late in the day with y K-1 trips, DF A 150-450. A 2Xs comforter and >hot some little birds. The a

Re: Pesos For tje bords

Pretty good at that ISO Philip Northeast www.aviewfinderdarkly.com.au On 28/11/16 10:54 am, Paul Stenquist wrote: Went p ut late in the day with y K-1 trips, DF A 150-450. A 2Xs comforter and hot some little birds. The are pushed pretty hard, about ISO 25,600 and tight crops, but still fun

Re: Pesos For tje bords

Thanks Dan. I'm pleased with the A 2X-S as an alternative converter. I hope Pentax comes up with a D FA 2X one of these days. Paul via phone > On Nov 27, 2016, at 7:27 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote: > > Nice, clear, pleasing shots with excellent detail. > > > Dan Matyola

Re: Pesos For tje bords

Thanks Ann. I agree. Got lucky with some nice backlight on the first. All the foliage will soon be gone. Might open up some interesting looks. But I need to escape the backyard and get out to the nature centers. Paul via phone > On Nov 27, 2016, at 7:15 PM, ann sanfedele

Re: Pesos For tje bords

Nice, clear, pleasing shots with excellent detail. Dan Matyola http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 6:54 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote: > Went p ut late in the day with y K-1 trips, DF A 150-450. A 2Xs comforter > and hot some little birds.

Re: Pesos For tje bords

I quite like the first Sparrow , noisy or not - nice geometry... and pretty greens.. The second one I like less because there is so little variance in the foliage - ann On 11/27/2016 7:10 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote: Good God, why don’t I read what I post before I hit send? The subject line

Re: Pesos For tje bords

Good God, why don’t I read what I post before I hit send? The subject line was supposed to be “For the Birds.” Not very original but better than For tje bords. Where is autocorrect when I need it? The copy should have said, “I went out late in the day with my K-1, tripod, DF A 150-450 and A

Pesos For tje bords

Went p ut late in the day with y K-1 trips, DF A 150-450. A 2Xs comforter and hot some little birds. The are pushed pretty hard, about ISO 25,600 and tight crops, but still fun to shoot. http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18315490=lg http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18315489=lg