Harold Owen wrote:
The UK magazine 'Photography Monthly' reviews the Pentax
*ist in the
August issue.
Overall it is a favourable review for the new camera
snip
So the UK's most incompetent photo magazine gives the *ist a
good review? The only positive thing about such a review
whickersworld wrote:
We should wait and see what a competent and reputable
magazine (such as Amateur Photographer) says about the
*ist. Maybe then we can begin to draw conclusions.
There's an *ist review in the current issue of Chasseur d'Images too. I
didn't bother to read it, but if someone is
The UK magazine 'Photography Monthly' reviews the Pentax *ist in the
August issue.
Overall it is a favourable review for the new camera, the whats bad
items are:-
HANDLING:-'light spill from the AF points irritating'
EASE OF USE:- 'Very little to complain about'
FEATURES:- 'Little
Hi,
Thursday, July 17, 2003, 11:40:19 AM, you wrote:
The UK magazine 'Photography Monthly' reviews the Pentax *ist in the
August issue.
Overall it is a favourable review for the new camera, the whats bad
items are:-
HANDLING:-'light spill from the AF points irritating'
EASE OF USE
4 matches
Mail list logo
