>
> Hi all.
>
> 'SMC PENTAX PF FILTER 112mm JAPAN'
>
> I thought I would keep it for a rainy day but I can't see myself buying
> another fast 300mm anytime soon.
What Pentax glass does this fit? A* 300/2.8? FA* 250-600/5.6?
If so, then I believe I'm interested.
From: "Joe Wilensky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I don't think that is true. As far as I can tell, it's the exact same
> camera. In fact, I sent an MZ-5n (Europe/Asia version of the
> U.S.-labeled ZX-5n) in to Pentax USA for a CLA/repair last year with no
> problems.
Well then I'm stumped. I've been ey
I don't think that is true. As far as I can tell, it's the exact same
camera. In fact, I sent an MZ-5n (Europe/Asia version of the
U.S.-labeled ZX-5n) in to Pentax USA for a CLA/repair last year with no
problems.
Joe
On Feb 6, 2004, at 7:32 PM, Mark Dalal wrote:
From: "Joe Wilensky" <[EMAIL P
From: "Joe Wilensky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> BTW, do you know why KEH consistently sells Z-1p cameras for
> significantly cheaper than PZ-1p cameras, even in the same condition?
> They are the exact same camera model, correct?
I don't believe that Pentax USA would repair the Z-1p. That would pose a
I bought my PZ-1p for $325USD on Ebay in mint/mint condition with original
box and manual over a year ago. It was a replacement Pentax had sent the
seller to a warranty issue and he never used it except once to verify that
it worked. From all appearances it seems to be as he said. This seller
ad
I remember the going prices for mint Z-1p were like CA$4xx recently on eBay.
I thought they would worth a little more as well, but obviously the digital
thing kills many film products.
Regards,
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
I already have a PZ-1p, or I'd be quite interested. Have there
> Oops ... That's the first time in three years that I've sent a
> response to the list by accident when I meant to send it to one
> person directly ... just once in three years isn't bad, I suppose
> ...
It's better than my average, Joe - I'm probably good for one
misplaced missive per year - .
Oops ... That's the first time in three years that I've sent a
response to the list by accident when I meant to send it to one
person directly ... just once in three years isn't bad, I suppose ...
Joe
Hi, Mark,
I already have a PZ-1p, or I'd be quite interested. Have there really
been no takers so far at that price? I briefly put my PZ-1p (EX+)
plus grip strap up for sale for $425 when I was considering switching
to the MZ-S. I had no takers, and eventually decided I'd rather keep
the PZ-1p
I think that this would be a very fine lens for *ist-D
nature photography! I would be tempted except that I already
have a 300mm...
I think you overestimate the variability of light in a
typical nature photography scene. You really don't need to
be constantly adjusting the aperature/speed/ISO
Let me know when you want to sell it. :-)
Regards,
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
It's unfortunate that I'm not in the market for a Z-1p right now --
especially
since I *have* a spare plug for the remote release cable :-)
ERN
__
> > Bogen/Manfrotto 486 compact ball head, used a couple
>
> I'm interested. Is it a quick release style? Would
> it be too small for 2021 legs?
Nope, it's not quick release. According to B&H, it fits any Bogen
tripod. It was too big to work with my monopod; that's why I'm selling
it.
--- Amita,
I'm interested. Is it a quick release style? Would
it be too small for 2021 legs?
> Bogen/Manfrotto 486 compact ball head, used a couple
Thanks,
=
jmb `:^)
So, this is not a real Domke, but an imitation ... correct?
> Brand new Domke F803 black bag [copy] [...] $65
>
Some might argue that the 77 limited is the poor mans 50 (75) f/1.4.
;-)
Peter
- Original Message -
From: "Shel Belinkoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 2:55 PM
Subject: Re: FS Friday: 50mm f/1.4
> So that would b
- Original Message -
From: "Rothman, Aric"
Subject: RE: FS Friday: 50mm f/1.4
> William,
>
> Thanks for the info. I wended my way back through recent messages and
found the details. The ist-D keeps looking
> better and better. I really enjoyed working with
Aha, that's what B&H is for!
Jeff Jonsson
-Original Message-
From: Rothman, Aric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 8:59 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: FS Friday: 50mm f/1.4
William,
Thanks for the info. I wended my way back through
I use the A version on my *ist D and I really like this. What's funny
is that the image in the viewfinder appears almost exactly life size,
i.e., one eye in the viewfinder and one open to the world get the same
image.
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexing
L PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 10:45 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: FS Friday: 50mm f/1.4
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Rothman, Aric"
> Subject: RE: FS Friday: 50mm f/1.4
>
>
>
> > Mark,
> >
>
- Original Message -
From: "Rothman, Aric"
Subject: RE: FS Friday: 50mm f/1.4
> Mark,
>
> What modification had to be made to make the M series lens work on the
ist-D? I tried to use the very same lens on an
> ist-D at the local shoppe, but could only use it at
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Roberts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
...
> Got an M series 50/1.4 that I'd like to sell. It's in EX+ condition.
> Veeery nice ;) includes rear cap but not front. $50.00 plus shipping.
>
> Works on the *ist-D now ;-)
>
Mark,
What modification had to be ma
Lovely! Enjoy...
keith
Stan Halpin wrote:
>
> I am headed to Sweden. A five day meeting, I am arriving three days early,
> then staying four days after. My first time in that corner of the world...
>
> Stan
>
> on 9/13/03 10:35 AM, Keith Whaley at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Hi Stan,
> >
>
I am headed to Sweden. A five day meeting, I am arriving three days early,
then staying four days after. My first time in that corner of the world...
Stan
on 9/13/03 10:35 AM, Keith Whaley at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi Stan,
>
> If you don't mind revealing it -- when are you leaving, and whe
>
> I have decided to lighten the load so to speak,and sell some
> 35mm equipment
> to fund some MF equipment.
>
> 1- SF-1 with 35-70 af macro zoom.Sells for +- $350-400 Canadian here.
> 2- Sigm
Christian Skofteland wrote:
Starting to fund a *ist-D. I'm reducing my kit to one LX and one MX.
MX: Needs CLA. Meter is iffy, foam is falling apart, focusing screen is
dusty. Hot shoe and PC terminal don't work. Shutter is good. US$50.00
I'd be interested in seeing a picture of this on
Sorry this should not have gone public
/Paul
From: "Paul Eriksson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: FS: Friday
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 16:41:15 -0800
Is it free shipping with this item as well?
Gameboy Pocket US$30
(with 2
Is it free shipping with this item as well?
Gameboy Pocket US$30
(with 2 games, all mint, screen 100% scratch free)
http://www3.telus.net/wlachan/gameboy.jpg
_
Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.
http://joi
I'll take this one if it's still available.
Ken
On Friday 21 March 2003 09:22 pm, Geoff Moes wrote:
> Pentax M 50/f1.7 internal dust No caps dust $10
--
Ken Archer Canine Photography
San Antonio, Texas
"Business Is Going To The Dogs"
This is gettin' out of hand cotty!!
If I didn't already have the 100-300, I would jump at this - I debated
long and hard between them! You don't have the 1.4* convertor for it do
you? I would buy that.
> -Original Message-
> From: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 12 September
>Traitor he says, traitor? If I pay shipping outside of the USA it wont be
>worth me selling it!
If Sir Walter Raleigh had said that way back when, well - we'd all be in
right stink, eh!
(papers arrived yet Fawlty?)
*hic*
___
Personal email
Traitor he says, traitor? If I pay shipping outside of the USA it wont be
worth me selling it!
Regards,
/\/\ick...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Cotty
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 1:55 PM
To: Pentax List
Subject: FS Friday
>I'll do
Yes, the original finder is a non-metering prism. I just did a coverage
comparison: They're identical. I focused on a paned window and marked the
edge of frame with duct tape. There is no difference between the two
finders. Both are the 6x7 variants The TTL is probably older than the
non-metering
On Sunday, March 10, 2002, at 10:42 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
> Yep, MLU and a standard finder.
FOR $202?? Wow. Good score.
I bought my 67 new, and the brassing pattern I've noticed from my daily
use is about what you describe: around the door and at the top of the
prism.
Standard finder
Yep, MLU and a standard finder. It was a no-reserve auction that was
ignored for some reason. I stumbled across it one night when it had just
three minutes to go, and it was at $163. The photos of the camera made it
look pretty scrufty, but in truth, it's quite nice with just paint missing
from th
On Saturday, March 9, 2002, at 03:49 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
> How much was it? Has it surpassed my 6x7 buy at 202.11 as the best MF
> buy
> of all time? If so, I'll have to go back to scouting ebay round the
> clock
> :-)
It was less than $1500, if I remember right, like new with boxes. S
How much was it? Has it surpassed my 6x7 buy at 202.11 as the best MF buy
of all time? If so, I'll have to go back to scouting ebay round the clock
:-)
Paul
Aaron Reynolds wrote:
> On Friday, March 8, 2002, at 05:58 PM, Bruce Dayton wrote:
>
> > We certainly want an explanation concerning this
frank theriault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>What? A 645n?
>
>NOT, a 6x7? I'm not a member of the Brotherhood, so maybe it's none of my
>business, but I wonder what your other Brothers and Sisters will have to say
>about that??
The underground 645 movement: We move with much less bluster than t
What? A 645n?
NOT, a 6x7? I'm not a member of the Brotherhood, so maybe it's none of my
business, but I wonder what your other Brothers and Sisters will have to say
about that??
;-)
-frank
Aaron Reynolds wrote:
> .I talked him into buying a 645n. ;)
>
--
"The optimist thinks this is the b
601 - 638 of 638 matches
Mail list logo
