RE: Manual Focus Bodies Lenses

2001-10-22 Thread Kent Gittings
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 8:24 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Manual Focus Bodies Lenses Hi Ed, I was the original poster, and, although I never said I wanted manual advance, it's generally my preference. Why? Because it's quieter. The camera doesn't automatically advance after each

RE: Manual Focus Bodies Lenses

2001-10-22 Thread Kent Gittings
causing factors. Kent Gittings -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ed Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 9:55 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Manual Focus Bodies Lenses -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL

Re: Manual Focus Bodies Lenses

2001-10-20 Thread Mike Johnston
Shel wrote: I was the original poster, and, although I never said I wanted manual advance, it's generally my preference. Why? Because it's quieter. Shel, The old EOS RT, still one of my favorites among all the cameras that have passed through my hands, had a nifty feature. If you took a

Re: Manual Focus Bodies Lenses

2001-10-20 Thread Shel Belinkoff
Hi Mike ... You have a lot of favorite cameras, Mike ;-)) What you've described sounds like a kludge, although I'm sure it has its place and value. It seems fine if you're going to let the camera wind on in a short time, but holding one's finder on the shutter release for a longer time, say 20

Re: Manual Focus Bodies Lenses

2001-10-20 Thread Shel Belinkoff
Hi Ed, This is correct. The winder ME-II allows manual advance with the winder either turned on or off - IOW, you can override the winder. Film is manually rewound in any case. At least that's how it works with the ME Super, and I suspect it would be no different for any other body to which

Re: Manual Focus Bodies Lenses

2001-10-20 Thread Bill D. Casselberry
Ed wrote: If I recall correctly, with my old Super Program and Winder ME-II, you could just use the shutter release on the camera and do it all manually, or use the shutter release on the winder and let the automation work for you. Yup, just so Best of Both Worlds:^)

RE: Manual Focus Bodies Lenses

2001-10-19 Thread Mick Maguire
They still make A series lenses presumably for the ZX-M. They have updated the look of them to look like the FA but they are still called A series. Regards, /\/\ick... ++ || __/) Mick Maguire | | Email: [EMAIL

RE: Manual Focus Bodies Lenses

2001-10-19 Thread Kent Gittings
Pentax, Minolta, and Nikon all still make manual gear in 35mm. Kent Gittings -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Shel Belinkoff Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 10:16 AM To: Pentax List Subject: Manual Focus Bodies Lenses Does Pentax now

Re: Manual Focus Bodies Lenses

2001-10-19 Thread Michael Nosal
At 07:15 AM 10/19/01 -0700, you wrote: Does Pentax now make any manual focus bodies and lenses that can be purchased new? On a similar note, besides Leica, Olympus, and Contax, does any other manufacturer produce manual focus cameras and lenses? -- Shel Belinkoff mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -

Re: Manual Focus Bodies Lenses

2001-10-19 Thread Jaume Lahuerta
--- Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I forgot about the ZX-M. I wonder why g. I'll look at the specs at Boz's site, although, if I recall, it doesn't offer manual (thumb activated) film advance. True. What about MF lenses? If Pentax is making a MF body then it must be making

Re: Manual Focus Bodies Lenses

2001-10-19 Thread Rfsindg
Shel, Do you think our some of our good old Pentax MF lenses are going 'classic'? g It makes me want to go out and buy the best. Regards, Bob S. Shel said: Does Pentax now make any manual focus bodies and lenses that can be purchased new? On a similar note, besides Leica, Olympus, and

Re: Manual Focus Bodies lenses

2001-10-19 Thread Camdir
In a message dated 19/10/01 16:06:33 GMT Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Subject: Manual Focus Bodies Lenses Does Pentax now make any manual focus bodies and lenses that can be purchased new? Shel. Apart from the LX2000, and MZM, nope. Not in production. The existing stock

Re: Manual Focus Bodies Lenses

2001-10-19 Thread Takehiko Ueda
Hi Shel, As to the Japanese market, the result is as follows; PENTAX: Body--MZ-M and 67II Lenses--16 A, and K lenses, five 645lenses, and 22 67lenses OLYMPUS: Body--OM3Ti, OM4Ti, and OM2000 Lenses--31 Zuiko lenses CANON: Body--None Lenses--None CONTAX: Body--RTSIII, RX, Aria, (AX) Lenses--28

Re: Manual Focus Bodies Lenses

2001-10-19 Thread Isaac Crawford
Shel Belinkoff wrote: Does Pentax now make any manual focus bodies and lenses that can be purchased new? They currently manufacture the ZX-M and the 50mm f2.0 A. I have heard conflicting reports about weather or not Pentax is actually making other A series lenses or just selling old

Re: Manual Focus Bodies Lenses

2001-10-19 Thread Isaac Crawford
Sas Gabor wrote: Hi, On 19 Oct 2001 at 7:15, Shel Belinkoff wrote: Does Pentax now make any manual focus bodies and lenses that can be purchased new? (I think of 35mm SLRs.) Yes, the MZ-M and some A series lenses. On a similar note, besides Leica, Olympus, and Contax, does any

Re: Manual Focus Bodies Lenses

2001-10-19 Thread Isaac Crawford
Michael Nosal wrote: Minolta still lists the X-370, though I don't know if it is currently being produced or not. Yes it is... Phoenix has two manual focus models, the P1 and P2. Vivitar has several manual focus models. Konica has the Hexar RF with manual focus. Voightlander

RE: Manual Focus Bodies Lenses

2001-10-19 Thread Paris, Leonard
: Friday, October 19, 2001 10:35 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Manual Focus Bodies Lenses --- Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I forgot about the ZX-M. I wonder why g. I'll look at the specs at Boz's site, although, if I recall, it doesn't offer manual (thumb activated) film

RE: Manual Focus Bodies Lenses

2001-10-19 Thread Ed
Out of curiosity, why is it you want manual advance? Thanks, Ed http://lightandsilver.com -Original Message- (who's the oringinal poster?) I forgot about the ZX-M. I wonder why g. I'll look at the specs at Boz's site, although, if I recall, it doesn't offer manual

Re: Manual Focus Bodies Lenses

2001-10-19 Thread Shel Belinkoff
Hi Ed, I was the original poster, and, although I never said I wanted manual advance, it's generally my preference. Why? Because it's quieter. The camera doesn't automatically advance after each exposure, and I can choose when to advance it. Because, in most instances, I can rewind the film

Re: Manual Focus Bodies Lenses

2001-10-19 Thread Wendy Beard
- --- Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I forgot about the ZX-M. I wonder why g. I'll look at the specs at Boz's site, although, if I recall, it doesn't offer manual (thumb activated) film advance. I recently bought a MZ-M and it came with an A 35-80. When I used it I found the