Hell,trying to stay up past 9 pm is
a challenge in itt's self let alone
worrying aboy younger women :-) :-)
Dave
Begin Original Message
From: Aaron Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sun, 9 Dec 2001 10:16:46 -0500
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: No more Nikon girls
On Saturday
On Saturday, December 8, 2001, at 05:36 PM, Mike Johnston wrote:
Aaron wrote:
Not that it matters anymore, since I'm getting married, but Aaron's two
rules were No More Nikon Girls and No More 'Actresses'.
My rules are no more married women, no more women in the middle of a
divorce, no
EEK!
Does that mean a Polaroid option is open?
Malcolm
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Aaron Reynolds
Sent: 09 December 2001 15:17
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: No more Nikon girls
On Saturday, December 8, 2001, at 05:36 PM
In local.pentax, you wrote:
EEK!
Does that mean a Polaroid option is open?
There is one on http://elsa.photo.net .
--
http://members.chello.nl/~j.schoone\\|//
Registered Linux user #78364 - The Linux Counter - http://counter.li.org
Assume nothing, expect
Aaron Reynolds wrote:
Did you hear that, PDML? MIKE SAYS THAT HE'D DATE A NIKON GIRL.
Mike, you know I love you, but I fear you must be shunned over this.
Hi, Aaron,
I would say something to Mike about this, but I'm too busy shunning him! ;-)
regards,
frank
--
The optimist thinks
December 2001 17:51
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: No more Nikon girls
In local.pentax, you wrote:
EEK!
Does that mean a Polaroid option is open?
There is one on http://elsa.photo.net .
--
http://members.chello.nl/~j.schoone\\|//
Registered Linux user #78364
6 matches
Mail list logo