Thanks, to those who responded to my question about the digital image to
transparency situation. Several good suggestions. Out local high quality
digital lab doesn't offer the service because the quality is usually very
poor even with a ultra high resolution file. The tech recommended copying
I would speculate on the why as being so that the image was on a stable
non-volatile media. If you store them on hard disk, you are susceptible to
the disk crashing and if you store them on a floppy you could find either
that a stray magnetic field images to wipe the floppy at some point or that
W Keith Mosier wrote:
Does anyone know how to convert digital images to common sized
transparencies? Expensive/inexpensive? Why?
Anyone with a negative writer can do it. Cost varies wildly from place
to place, depending on quality and speed. Places like Kinkos will do
inexpensive,
Keith Mosier wrote:
For some reason, which could not be explained to me, my cohorts
foresee the need to convert a digital image file to a transparency.
[Snip]
Does anyone know how to convert digital images to common sized
transparencies? Expensive/inexpensive? Why?
Hi Keith,
Could
W Keith Mosier writes:
(Can't wait for the MZ-S/digital, and the budget isn't that fat.)
Pity, because if you put the FA100/2.8 macro lens on it you'll have a
scanner.
Does anyone know how to convert digital images to common sized
transparencies? Expensive/inexpensive? Why?
There's
5 matches
Mail list logo
