Re: OT Stanstead, was: Unusual subjects to photograph.

Nearly all of the increase in air miles is by internal flights. Well, the road and rail network has gone to hell on a handcart and will cost billions to sort. Airport expansion is the quick cheap fix - a *bit* of land around the airports and journey times are kept low. The numbers travelling

RE: OT Stanstead, was: Unusual subjects to photograph.

Amita Guha wrote: Government won't pay. People will argue about the funding and never agree on a suitable re-location. What about an organization like the National Trust stepping in? The National Trust is a charitable organisation who rely on property being 'given' to them, generally of

RE: OT Stanstead, was: Unusual subjects to photograph.

Bill Owens wrote: Here in the USA, airport parking lots are an airport's largest source of income. Here in the UK, particularly airports like Gatwick, Heathrow and Stanstead have astonishingly good bus, coach and rail links (and Underground to central London in the case of Heathrow) and

Re: OT Stanstead, was: Unusual subjects to photograph.

- Original Message - From: Malcolm Smith Subject: RE: OT Stanstead, was: Unusual subjects to photograph. I would like to see parking areas reduced, thus destroying less land, but for the point you make above, it's never going to happen. We have a lot of excess land here

RE: OT Stanstead, was: Unusual subjects to photograph.

The National Trust is a charitable organisation who rely on property being 'given' to them, generally of outstanding national historic interest, most of which come with a substantial amount of land, which they can open to visitors to help offset the maintenance costs. I can't think of any

RE: OT Stanstead, was: Unusual subjects to photograph.

William Robb wrote: We have a lot of excess land here that can be used as parking lots that you in the UK just don't have. True. Not that we should be turning excess land into parking lots, mind you. Well said. Malcolm