On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 03:09:25 -0800, Keith Whaley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The explanation makes the photo, in truth.
> I know there's a lot of commentary to the contrary, but there simply are
> some photos that benefit from a little help.
I was going to mention the "explanation" at the fir
On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 14:52:12 -0800, Pat White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Frank's bike don't need no steenkeeng brakes! Looks like it's got none.
> Nice bike, I bet it's very light.
>
> Pat White
>
Thanks Pat (and Chris, too). Whenever anyone asks where the brakes
are, I slap my thighs real l
On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 23:31:27 +, Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It doesn't need a seat either or so I gather
>
They're calling me Falsetto Frank nowadays...
-frank
--
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson
On 11/11/04, Pat White, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Frank's bike don't need no steenkeeng brakes! Looks like it's got none.
>Nice bike, I bet it's very light.
It doesn't need a seat either or so I gather
:-)
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
Frank's bike don't need no steenkeeng brakes! Looks like it's got none.
Nice bike, I bet it's very light.
Pat White
So... uh... where are the brakes? And the kickstand? ;)
Chris
On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 18:57:45 -0500, frank theriault
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'll say more about it later, but I will say that's my Rossin Track
> Bike in the foreground. Comments are always welcome:
>
> http://www.photo.net/p
frank theriault wrote:
On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 19:58:22 -0800, Bruce Dayton
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have to agree. Even though you didn't think it would make any
difference, Frank, the explanation does bring more meaning and
interest into the photo. Thanks for sharing it.
The explanation makes
On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 19:58:22 -0800, Bruce Dayton
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have to agree. Even though you didn't think it would make any
> difference, Frank, the explanation does bring more meaning and
> interest into the photo. Thanks for sharing it.
>
Well, I'm glad. Thanks both Paul an
I have to agree. Even though you didn't think it would make any
difference, Frank, the explanation does bring more meaning and
interest into the photo. Thanks for sharing it.
Bruce
Wednesday, November 10, 2004, 7:34:56 PM, you wrote:
PS> i find this photo much more enjoyable now that I know w
i find this photo much more enjoyable now that I know what "clear at
the can" means. Sometimes words and photos work together to tell a
better story than either can relate on their own. This is one of those
times. Thanks for explaining this scenario. In that context, I find it
very interesting.
On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 18:23:32 -0800, Bruce Dayton
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Then, as it stands, it doesn't speak to me - not being much of a
> rider. More like a Shel "Happy Snap" type of image. Goodness knows,
> I have a ton of them myself.
>
Well, if I tell you about the title, I'm sure the
Then, as it stands, it doesn't speak to me - not being much of a
rider. More like a Shel "Happy Snap" type of image. Goodness knows,
I have a ton of them myself.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Wednesday, November 10, 2004, 6:16:33 PM, you wrote:
ft> On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 17:07:44 -0800, Bruce Dayton
f
On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 17:07:44 -0800, Bruce Dayton
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, you have lost me with the title. The image seems a bit busy to
> me, but again, I'm not quite sure what I am looking at based on the
> title. Appears to be a snap of two riders taking a break. You're
> going to hav
Hi Frank ...
I'll agree with Bruce about the business. That the one fellow has his head
down doesn't add anything to the pic, and may well detract from it. Far
from one of your best ... sorry can't muster any enthusiasm for this
one.
Shel
> From: frank theriault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
Ok, you have lost me with the title. The image seems a bit busy to
me, but again, I'm not quite sure what I am looking at based on the
title. Appears to be a snap of two riders taking a break. You're
going to have to fill me in just a bit more.
Bruce
Wednesday, November 10, 2004, 3:57:45 PM,
15 matches
Mail list logo