Re: PESO - Cape May Gingerbread (Yum!)

2013-07-02 Thread Rick Womer
: Monday, July 1, 2013 11:20 PM Subject: Re: PESO - Cape May Gingerbread (Yum!) Rick, Very interesting and colorful. I can't understand the Roof line on the left. There seems to be sky between the left most part and the main roof. Regards,  Bob S. On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 8:03 PM, Rick Womer rwomer1

Re: PESO - Cape May Gingerbread (Yum!)

2013-07-02 Thread Bruce Walker
Beautifully detailed, Rick. The flag is cooperating very nicely. :-) On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 9:03 PM, Rick Womer rwomer1...@yahoo.com wrote: In contrast to the architecture in my previous post: http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=1792 (K-5, DA 16-45) Comments appreciated! Rick

Re: PESO - Cape May Gingerbread (Yum!)

2013-07-02 Thread Bob Sullivan
part of the house--maybe a later addition? Thanks! Rick http://photo.net/photos/RickW - Original Message - From: Bob Sullivan rf.sulli...@gmail.com To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net Cc: Sent: Monday, July 1, 2013 11:20 PM Subject: Re: PESO - Cape May Gingerbread (Yum

Re: PESO - Cape May Gingerbread (Yum!)

2013-07-01 Thread Daniel J. Matyola
That's the Cape May that I know and love! Nicely rendered. Dan Matyola http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 9:03 PM, Rick Womer rwomer1...@yahoo.com wrote: In contrast to the architecture in my previous post:

RE: PESO - Cape May Gingerbread (Yum!)

2013-07-01 Thread knarftheria...@gmail.com
Beautiful! cheers, frank --- Original Message --- From: Rick Womer rwomer1...@yahoo.com Sent: July 1, 2013 7/1/13 To: Pentax List pdml@pdml.net Subject: PESO - Cape May Gingerbread (Yum!) In contrast to the architecture in my previous post: http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=1792

Re: PESO - Cape May Gingerbread (Yum!)

2013-07-01 Thread Bob Sullivan
Rick, Very interesting and colorful. I can't understand the Roof line on the left. There seems to be sky between the left most part and the main roof. Regards, Bob S. On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 8:03 PM, Rick Womer rwomer1...@yahoo.com wrote: In contrast to the architecture in my previous post: