Thank you, Marco.
On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 1:14 PM, Marco Alpert wrote:
> Lovely! And subtly dreamlike.
>
> - Marco
>
>> On Aug 3, 2016, at 8:58 AM, Bruce Walker wrote:
>>
>> A different take on the orange daylily.
>>
>> I've been trying out different
Lovely! And subtly dreamlike.
- Marco
> On Aug 3, 2016, at 8:58 AM, Bruce Walker wrote:
>
> A different take on the orange daylily.
>
> I've been trying out different subjects and light with a 6x7 120mm
> f:3.5 soft focus lens on the 645z. This is a flower in the full
Dan,
You got any sharp versions?
I still like sharp...
Regards, Bob S.
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 10:17 AM, Daniel J. Matyola
danmaty...@gmail.com wrote:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=17792819
Comments are invited.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
--
I quite like the abstractness of that, Dan. It just looks cool.
Reminds me of caramel-vanilla ice cream.
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Daniel J. Matyola
danmaty...@gmail.com wrote:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=17792819
Comments are invited.
Dan Matyola
Yes, so do I, but I thought this came out a bit interesting.
I was trying to take image of a gardenia flower on my deck with the 35
macro, when I began to wonder exactly how close I could get. I dialed
to focus ring all the way to the minimum limit, and moved in as close
as I could. When I
Yes, it looks very much like a caramel gelato dessert I had the other day.
It is a gardenia bloom W A Y out of focus, and intentionally so. I
kind of like it.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Bruce Walker bruce.wal...@gmail.com
Appears you have most of an oof distorted face. G
J
- Original Message -
From: Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com
To: PDML pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2014 8:17:27 AM
Subject: PESO: Soft
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=17792819
Comments are invited.
Dan Matyola
Not exactly, but one can see into anything that one can imagine.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 11:54 AM, Jack Davis jdavi...@comcast.net wrote:
Appears you have most of an oof distorted face. G
J
- Original Message -
From:
That reminds me of vanilla ice cream, and I got hungry. Nicely done!
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 6:17 PM, Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com wrote:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=17792819
Comments are invited.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
--
PDML
On 6/12/2010 6:26 AM, Bruce Dayton wrote:
This shot was taken in my backyard recently when the lighting was
reasonably diffused.
Pentax K20D, F 85/2.8 Soft
ISO 100, 1/640 sec @ f/4.5
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkdphoto_00810.htm
Comments welcome
Oh, your-my-your preciou ;-)...
On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 20:48 -0700, Bruce Dayton
bkday...@daytonphoto.com wrote:
This is how a soft focus lens renders bright areas. The wider the
aperture, the more softened and highlights tend to halo like that.
So no, post processing consisted only of very minor brightening,
minor contrast
Le 12/06/10 05:26, Bruce Dayton a écrit :
This shot was taken in my backyard recently when the lighting was
reasonably diffused.
Pentax K20D, F 85/2.8 Soft
ISO 100, 1/640 sec @ f/4.5
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkdphoto_00810.htm
Comments welcome
beautiful ... an eye candy !
Totally well done, Bruce!
Jack
--- On Fri, 6/11/10, Bruce Dayton bkday...@daytonphoto.com wrote:
From: Bruce Dayton bkday...@daytonphoto.com
Subject: PESO - Soft
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: Friday, June 11, 2010, 8:26 PM
This shot was taken in my backyard
recently
Beautiful. Can one get the same effect by superimposing focused and OOF images?
Rick
http://photo.net/photos/RickW
--- On Fri, 6/11/10, Bruce Dayton bkday...@daytonphoto.com wrote:
This shot was taken in my backyard
recently when the lighting was
reasonably diffused.
Pentax K20D, F
Bruce Dayton wrote
This shot was taken in my backyard recently when the lighting was
reasonably diffused.
Pentax K20D, F 85/2.8 Soft
ISO 100, 1/640 sec @ f/4.5
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkdphoto_00810.htm
Comments welcome
--
Bruce
Lovely Bruce. One of those lenses went
Like dominique says, beautiful eye candy.
You've got to have a great portfolio of flower shots by now.
I'd wonder about publishing them somehow.
Regards, Bob S.
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 3:53 AM, Madame RD romd...@orange.fr wrote:
Le 12/06/10 05:26, Bruce Dayton a écrit :
This shot was taken in
On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 20:26 -0700, Bruce Dayton
bkday...@daytonphoto.com wrote:
This shot was taken in my backyard recently when the lighting was
reasonably diffused.
Pentax K20D, F 85/2.8 Soft
ISO 100, 1/640 sec @ f/4.5
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkdphoto_00810.htm
Great subtle
This is how a soft focus lens renders bright areas. The wider the
aperture, the more softened and highlights tend to halo like that.
So no, post processing consisted only of very minor brightening,
minor contrast increase. That's it.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Friday, June 11, 2010, 8:33:12 PM,
Le 20/04/10 03:35, Bruce Dayton a écrit :
We are heavily overcast and rain will be coming in later this
evening. Just about dusk I took this shot.
Pentax K-x, Tokina AT-X 400/5.6
ISO 2000, 1/200 sec @ f/9, tripod mounted
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkdphoto-5.htm
comments welcome
Bruce Dayton wrote:
We are heavily overcast and rain will be coming in later this
evening. Just about dusk I took this shot.
Pentax K-x, Tokina AT-X 400/5.6
ISO 2000, 1/200 sec @ f/9, tripod mounted
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkdphoto-5.htm
comments welcome
Bruce
You are on a
Very nice including the bokeh!
Toine
On 20 April 2010 03:35, Bruce Dayton bkday...@daytonphoto.com wrote:
We are heavily overcast and rain will be coming in later this
evening. Just about dusk I took this shot.
Pentax K-x, Tokina AT-X 400/5.6
ISO 2000, 1/200 sec @ f/9, tripod mounted
Nice work.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: Bruce Dayton bkday...@daytonphoto.com
Subject: PESO - Soft Light
We are heavily overcast and rain will be coming in later this
evening. Just about dusk I took this shot.
Pentax
Thanks for looking and commenting.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Monday, April 19, 2010, 9:08:37 PM, you wrote:
KW Nice work.
KW Kenneth Waller
KW http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
KW - Original Message -
KW From: Bruce Dayton bkday...@daytonphoto.com
KW Subject: PESO -
)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 24. februar 2007 16:00
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: PESO - Soft Lights - GDG
In a message dated 2/22/2007 11:08:29 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Feb 17
In a message dated 2/22/2007 11:08:29 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Feb 17, 2007, at 2:43 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
I enjoyed the PAW #6 photo a lot ... enough that I assembled a little
set of six images on the theme. Thought you might like to see
them ...
Hmmm, again I don't see the original message in my mailbox.
Godfrey, there is certain timelessness in these shots. There is one
Russian rock-song that I keep recalling looking at them. This song I
love dearly. Anyway, this is wonderful body of art.
Thanks!
Boris
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Nice
Thanks Boris! :-)
G
On Feb 22, 2007, at 10:52 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
Godfrey, there is certain timelessness in these shots. There is one
Russian rock-song that I keep recalling looking at them. This song I
love dearly. Anyway, this is wonderful body of art.
Nice work. Good job of varying the compositions while maintaining the
geometric theme. I like them.
Paul
On Feb 17, 2007, at 2:43 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
I enjoyed the PAW #6 photo a lot ... enough that I assembled a little
set of six images on the theme. Thought you might like to see
Thanks Paul!
G
On Feb 17, 2007, at 5:21 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Nice work. Good job of varying the compositions while maintaining the
geometric theme. I like them.
http://www.gdgphoto.com/softlights/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Hi!
BL Yuriy, I definitely like what I see. Perhaps going for uniform
BL background could be an option. You did make me miss my 85/2.8 soft
BL lens ;-).
BL Boris
I agreee with You. I did not know that You have missed Your soft
lens. When I desided to buy this soft lense I looked a lot to
Yuriy, I definitely like what I see. Perhaps going for uniform
background could be an option. You did make me miss my 85/2.8 soft
lens ;-).
Thanks.
On 11/28/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all,
Me experiment with the high key combined with the soft focus.
Any comments
Very impressionistic. I like it. Just out of
curiosity, did you also shoot it in a more
conventional fashion?
Rick
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all,
Me experiment with the high key combined with the
soft focus.
Any comments are wellcome!
My sentiments, too. It is something I would further explore.
--
Bruce
Tuesday, November 28, 2006, 5:28:55 AM, you wrote:
BL Yuriy, I definitely like what I see. Perhaps going for uniform
BL background could be an option. You did make me miss my 85/2.8 soft
BL lens ;-).
BL Thanks.
BL On
http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=118
There opens door and an old man sitting on a creaking chair starts to
sing blues, accompanied by his banjo. None of this happens, but I'll
wait a few moment more...
Photograph with a soul that is. I love it.
Roman.
--
home
I like it quite a bit. In this case the tilt works. You're right about
the subtlety of the colors, although a well-done BW could also be quite
nice. I'd love to see it larger and sharper.
RE: Bridgeport ... have you ever gone out along the Walker river, following
it east? Some great stuff out
Thanks, Roman.
The elderly hound at his feet will first stretch and then fall asleep
as he softly plays.
...yes, I think I can see it forming.
Jack
--- Roman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=118
There opens door and an old man sitting on a
Thanks, Shel,
This has only been wet printed and I guess I'm used to the bit of extra
grain associated with the slightly darker scene and, possibly for that
reason, don't like it as well sharper/brighter. I've tried it in the
past and had to delete it.
We stayed on the Walker while in Bridgeport
I like this as well. Very nice. It conveys the soft imagery that the title
suggests. The tilt is just wide-angle distortion. The horizon appears to be
correct based on the degree of tilt at each side of center, so it doesn't
bother me. In fact, it might enahnce it. It would be easy to correct
No, I don't plan a leveling change. As it happens, I'm now
comfortable with the current perspective. Wide angle distortion was
what I was describing by referencing the FOV.
I can image a hundred Summer evenings of quiet conversation
interspersed by frequent quiet laughter. A happy image, as
On Jul 6, 2006, at 8:02 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=118
Lovely imaging, subtle colors and textures. I'd have liked to see
just a little more in the composition, but it's nice as is.
Godfrey
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
i like all the details. run down bilding are always interesting to me
becaues of all the junk sitting around to add to the picture
russell
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Somewhat tight perhaps. I climbed a fence next to a No Trespassing
sign and did a ~nervous~ one shot take. This is all I got.
Thanks for all comments.
Jack
--- Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jul 6, 2006, at 8:02 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Gonz
Subject: Re: PESO - Soft
If you want to emulate the old portraiture style, then short depth of
field combined with spherical abberation is what is required, along with
lighting that has a fairly rapid fall off.
What do you mean by the last bit
On Jan 31, 2006, at 10:47 PM, Gonz wrote:
http://www.g0nz.com/images/k2softaprox.jpg
Its basically a gaussian of the original plus some level
adjustment, on top of the original with about 20% opacity or so. I
think it came out much better than the first, where I tried to get
fancier by
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Hi,
You might consider getting an old lens, like an Auto Takumar, which can be
purchased for a reasonable price, especially if the front element has some
cleaning marks.
They are surprisingly sharp, however, compared to the effects of one
of the soft lenses like the
Not bad. The effect is pretty good, but not exactly like a soft focus
lens. I have seen many attempts with PS to duplicate and have yet to
see the same thing. I suspect one issue is that when the picture is
taken, the actual depth of the image comes into play with the lens
effect. When in PS,
Adjusted version:
http://home.earthlink.net/~scbelinkoff/soft.html
The Gonz Original:
http://www.g0nz.com/images/k2softaprox.jpg
The differences are subtle, apart from the crop, so, if you can, you might
want to look at the two side-by-side.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Gonz [EMAIL
Very nice, thanks. I see you touched up some of the blemishes, which I
debated doing or not. The crop is also very interesting, giving more
space to the right and not centering the face. Your crop looks alot
better to me. I appreciate your efforts. I learned something.
rg
Shel
Hmmm ... you didn't mention the slightly warmer tone ... were you not able
to see it? It's subtle. If you view the pic in PS, which is a color
managed space, the differences may become more apparent.
Glad you found the crop to your liking ;-))
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Gonz
Very
Here is a link to some casual portraits illustrating the range of
softening available from the Pentax FA 85mm f2.8 Soft. lens:
http://www.pbase.com/jamesk8752/fa85_soft
Regards, Jim
I didnt notice the tone. My LCD display here is not the best for
viewing pics. At home I have a nice large color managed CRT which would
probably show it.
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Hmmm ... you didn't mention the slightly warmer tone ... were you not able
to see it? It's subtle. If you view
Thats amazing. Thanks Jim. I shows a much larger soft effect than I
expected at 2.8. I dont think you can achieve this with cheap normal
lenses as has been mentioned.
Jim King wrote:
Here is a link to some casual portraits illustrating the range of
softening available from the Pentax FA
A fat guy squinting in the sun???
-- Original message --
From: Gonz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thats amazing. Thanks Jim. I shows a much larger soft effect than I
expected at 2.8. I dont think you can achieve this with cheap normal
lenses as has been mentioned.
- Original Message -
From: Bruce Dayton
Subject: Re: PESO - Soft
Not bad. The effect is pretty good, but not exactly like a soft focus
lens. I have seen many attempts with PS to duplicate and have yet to
see the same thing. I suspect one issue is that when the picture is
taken
William Robb wrote:
I was going to comment on this earlier today, but was short of time
this morning.
I believe soft focus lenses are using uncorrected spherical abberation
to create the effects that they produce.
If you want to emulate the old portraiture style, then short depth of
field
- Original Message -
From: Adam Maas
Subject: Re: PESO - Soft
William,
Why not get an old uncoated M42 Tessar off eBay and use it on your
digital? Should have quite the 'old-fashioned' look to it. Real Carl
Zeiss Tessars are available in M42 mount pretty regularly on the Bay
On Tue, 31 Jan 2006, 12:51:48, pnstenquist wrote:
A fat guy squinting in the sun???
He's my financial advisor; I thought I'd put him to some honest work
for a change! I'd just received the lens and wanted a subject for my
tests of proper operation. A little softening did him a world of
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: Bruce Dayton
Subject: Re: PESO - Soft
Not bad. The effect is pretty good, but not exactly like a soft focus
lens. I have seen many attempts with PS to duplicate and have yet to
see the same thing. I suspect one issue is that when
Gonz wrote:
Oops wrong pic. It should have been:
http://www.g0nz.com/images/k2softaprox.jpg
Gonz wrote:
Another one with a similar technique as Soft, easier to do in PS.
http://www.g0nz.com/images/ksoftaprox.jpg
Comments welcome.
rg
I like k2 much more than k, which seems a little
On 1/29/06, Gonz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I dont have a soft portrait lens. I've been looking for one for a
while, but I keep missing them. Well, I figured I would try to use PS
to aproximate the effect. Its hard. Those lenses are quite special.
Here is an attempt using an older portrait
On 1/30/06, Gonz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oops wrong pic. It should have been:
http://www.g0nz.com/images/k2softaprox.jpg
I like this one even better than the first one!
She has gorgeous eyes...
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
frank theriault wrote:
On 1/30/06, Gonz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oops wrong pic. It should have been:
http://www.g0nz.com/images/k2softaprox.jpg
I like this one even better than the first one!
She has gorgeous eyes...
Thanks Frank. I like this one better too.
cheers,
frank
--
Thanks for the comments Derby. I think it might be useful to me to take
a picture with a soft lens to see what it actually looks like vs the
same picture using a normal lens. I might take up an offer that was
made by a member to let me borrow one.
The gaussian blur is only a layer that is
Hi,
You might consider getting an old lens, like an Auto Takumar, which can be
purchased for a reasonable price, especially if the front element has some
cleaning marks.
Right now I'm looking for one of those - one recently went for $37.00 on an
auction site and was described as being in mint
64 matches
Mail list logo