Cotty wrote:
As I understand the way Photoshop works, this is not correct. It is not
the user that decides if Photoshop has to swap to disk, it is Photoshop.
And it will readily do so depending on a number of factors including
levels of history vs file size etc. I am prepared to stand
for reasonable performance.
HTH
Regards,
Ziggy
-Original Message-
From: Bill D. Casselberry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16 January 2004 16:56
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Photoshop performance (was: Re: Used DSLR prices
Cotty wrote:
As I understand the way Photoshop works
zoomshot wrote:
There is nothing wrong with the PC interface..lets not have a
PC war
not a chance - just funnin' around :^)
... still using PShop v2.5.1 sys8.1 on a 90mhz PMac 7200
w/ 128meg RAM - 72meg allocated to PShop. Of course, I have
no film
Hi,
Friday, January 16, 2004, 4:55:51 PM, you wrote:
ah, but Cotty!
just because PhotoShop for Macintosh has such elegant
interface w/ the hardware is certainly no guarantee that
an equally graceful operation is possible on all other
computer
Same thing in WinDoze, bill ...
Bill D. Casselberry wrote:
Cotty wrote:
As I understand the way Photoshop works, this is not correct. It is not
the user that decides if Photoshop has to swap to disk, it is Photoshop.
And it will readily do so depending on a number of factors including
Bob W:
http://www.web-options.com/nerdkrieg.tif
Oh thank you ever so much! I have long wanted to see that particluar strip.
As you might know, it is featured in In The Beginning Was The
Command Line, the excellent eassay on computer culture by Neal
Stephenson.
The essay is available in many
6 matches
Mail list logo
