Ditto
-Original Message-
From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
knarftheria...@gmail.com
Sent: 17 November 2012 05:41
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: WTB or trade
Glad to see you posting, Boris.
Because of your last post I have resisted contacting you
Boris,
I understand and agree with your reasoning.
I have also the Sigma 18-50/2.8, a very fine lens, but I'am using the
Sigma 17-70/2.8-4 as default lens for its longer range, I bought it as
new for 230 euro, I will not switch to the SDM -version for reliability
reasons (my general
Thanks for the kind words, Jos!
On 11/17/2012 6:36 PM, Jos from Holland wrote:
Boris,
I understand and agree with your reasoning.
I have also the Sigma 18-50/2.8, a very fine lens, but I'am using the
Sigma 17-70/2.8-4 as default lens for its longer range, I bought it as
new for 230 euro, I
...@gmail.com
Sent: 17 November 2012 05:41
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: WTB or trade
Glad to see you posting, Boris.
Because of your last post I have resisted contacting you off-list or
commenting on-list.
Thoughts are with you and your family.
Cheers,
frank
--- Original Message ---
From
Hi Boris,
I wonder why you want the older one.
I have the older one. I am happy with it, but last week in the theatre,
I had to switch it to manual focus because of the screwdriver noise. The
HSM version would have been silent I guess.
At the other hand: I try to avoid HSM lenses for
Jos,
Here are few points that I find relevant:
1. The price/quality and price/reliability ratio of DA* 16-50 is high.
Although I am not terribly bothered by the soft corners at wider
apertures and wider focal lengths, it is a bit unpleasant to look at
wide shots Galia and I took in our most
Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: WTB or trade
Jos,
Here are few points that I find relevant:
1. The price/quality and price/reliability ratio of DA* 16-50 is high.
Although I am not terribly bothered by the soft corners at wider
apertures and wider focal lengths, it is a bit unpleasant
7 matches
Mail list logo