Bob W wrote:
> And you'll probably get a long rambling detour through the arcane
> mysteries of some barely-related side-issue before you even get close
> to the answer. The PDML is like an overnight bus journey with a
> garrulous drunk.
That was very sneaky. Now we're already off topic :-)
Malc
al relationship with the digital age has become more routine.
>> Interest peaks have flattened.
>>
>> Jack
>>
>> - Original Message -----
>> From: "Brian Walters"
>> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2015
I found the PDML via Bojidar Dimitrov's k-mount pages. He gives a glowing
recommendation.
Alan C
-Original Message-
From: Mark Roberts
Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2015 2:53 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Where is everyone?
Serious question: How did you find out a
MARK!
On 3/19/2015 06:53, mike wilson wrote:
Top up my pension fund for me and I'll post until your eyes bleed.
On 19 March 2015 at 02:03, Rick Womer wrote:
Lately I've noticed that the volume of PDML posts is way down. So,
being off this week and having some spare time, I did some research i
My photography was going in a direction that wasn't pleasing me. I
decided to cut back on interaction with photography sites, the camera
club and, in general, photo enthusiast stuff. So much of what is
discussed is only of interest to other photography hobbyists and isn't
even on the radar for mo
On 19 Mar 2015, at 13:33, Malcolm Smith wrote:
>
> Mark Roberts wrote:
>
>> I probably found out about the PDML from the Pentax official web site,
>> way back when the PDML was actually run by Pentax. But I'm wondering
>> how *anyone* would even learn of the PDML's existence these days.
>
> So
I googled (or whatever passed for googling in those days - it was through the
PDML that I learned about Google's early existence) because the mirror in my LX
kept sticking up.
I should have let it be.
B
> On 19 Mar 2015, at 12:54, Mark Roberts wrote:
>
> Serious question: How did you find
On Mar 19, 2015, at 8:53 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
> Serious question: How did you find out about the PDML?
> (Everyone please feel free to pipe up here.)
>
> I probably found out about the PDML from the Pentax official web site,
> way back when the PDML was actually run by Pentax. But I'm wonder
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 8:34 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
>>> The general relationship with the digital age has become more routine.
>>> Interest peaks have flattened.
>>>
>>> Jack
>>>
>>> - Original Message -
>>> From: "Bria
Mark Roberts wrote:
> I probably found out about the PDML from the Pentax official web site,
> way back when the PDML was actually run by Pentax. But I'm wondering
> how *anyone* would even learn of the PDML's existence these days.
So very long ago, I can't remember.
Many folk now seem to like w
digital age has become more routine.
>> Interest peaks have flattened.
>>
>> Jack
>>
>> - Original Message -
>> From: "Brian Walters"
>> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2015 10:34:07 PM
>> Subject
Same here. Found it on the Pentax website.
Paul via phone
> On Mar 19, 2015, at 8:53 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
>
> Serious question: How did you find out at the PDML?
> (Everyone please feel free to pipe up here.)
>
> I probably found out about the PDML from the Pentax official web site,
> way b
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 8:53 AM, Mark Roberts
wrote:
> Serious question: How did you find out at the PDML?
> (Everyone please feel free to pipe up here.)
>
> I probably found out about the PDML from the Pentax official web site,
> way back when the PDML was actually run by Pentax. But I'm wonderin
Serious question: How did you find out at the PDML?
(Everyone please feel free to pipe up here.)
I probably found out about the PDML from the Pentax official web site,
way back when the PDML was actually run by Pentax. But I'm wondering
how *anyone* would even learn of the PDML's existence these d
> Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2015 10:34:07 PM
> Subject: Re: Where is everyone?
>
> I think there are several reasons for the fall off in postings. The
> web-based DP Review & Pentax Forums are easy to find for people
> looking for info on their new cameras and for help wi
The general relationship with the digital age has become more routine.
Interest peaks have flattened.
Jack
- Original Message -
From: "Brian Walters"
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2015 10:34:07 PM
Subject: Re: Where is everyone?
I thi
Part of the problem is we're not Pentax Fanboys here. On a lot of the
Fora, brand is everything, id doesn't matter what the brand ultimately
does to you, and some users will even advocate for changes that will
render their previous investment at worst useless. Now that's brand
loyalty. I stic
What do you mean starting?
On 3/18/2015 11:55 PM, David Mann wrote:
I've noticed the same thing. I put it down to the spam filtering issues that
have been affecting users of some ISPs lately but maybe it's just that we're
starting to smell bad.
Cheers,
Dave
On Mar 19, 2015, at 3:03 pm, Ric
Top up my pension fund for me and I'll post until your eyes bleed.
On 19 March 2015 at 02:03, Rick Womer wrote:
> Lately I've noticed that the volume of PDML posts is way down. So,
> being off this week and having some spare time, I did some research in
> the archives.
>
> In January 2015, there
I think there are several reasons for the fall off in postings. The
web-based DP Review & Pentax Forums are easy to find for people
looking for info on their new cameras and for help with problems.
Also PDML has morphed into (mainly) a photo sharing list - nothing
wrong with that but ther
I think the problem is that email based forums have been replaced by web
based forums for various reasons.
jco
On 3/18/2015 10:03 PM, Rick Womer wrote:
Lately I've noticed that the volume of PDML posts is way down. So,
being off this week and having some spare time, I did some research in
the ar
I've noticed the same thing. I put it down to the spam filtering issues that
have been affecting users of some ISPs lately but maybe it's just that we're
starting to smell bad.
Cheers,
Dave
> On Mar 19, 2015, at 3:03 pm, Rick Womer wrote:
>
> Lately I've noticed that the volume of PDML posts
101 - 122 of 122 matches
Mail list logo
