ROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, March 05, 2004 12:21 PM
Subject: RE: clever virus attack (Att. Dalal)
> There is no problem in viewing either jpeg or gif files on my system at
this
> point in Outlook. Possibly in Microsoft's ongoing wisdom(meant to be
> sa
ECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 05, 2004 6:38 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: clever virus attack (Att. Dalal)
the attachments in this case were JPG and GIF files. since MS normally
configured these to open with IE, they were deemed unsafe and would not open
and could not be detached either, s
David Miers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, March 05, 2004 1:19 AM
Subject: RE: clever virus attack (Att. Dalal)
> I don't think you can configure the level one file extensions. What they
> have eliminated though I don't consider a bad thin
8:30 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: clever virus attack (Att. Dalal)
i don't remember MS allowing the end user to configure what constituted
Level 1. a lot of angry users called up to ask what happened to their
attachments for several months.
Herb
- Original Message -
Fro
OTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2004 1:59 PM
Subject: RE: clever virus attack (Att. Dalal)
> It does not allow any files attached that match the definitions in what is
> termed level 1. The mail will come in with the attachment deleted. This
> does not 100% stop virus attachments f
my 2cents worth
-Original Message-
From: Herb Chong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2004 6:21 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: clever virus attack (Att. Dalal)
i refuse to install Outlook 2000 on my machines because it still remains
vulnerable to scripting viruses
I think the password protection of the ZIP file makes virus detection
not possible.
My McAfee didn't found it before it was unzipped.
On Thu, 2004-03-04 at 17:30, Jostein wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Tanya Mayer Photography" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > My virus definitions in Norto
- Original Message -
From: "Tanya Mayer Photography" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> My virus definitions in Norton's are dated 2nd March.
The latest incarnations of Bagle emerged on the 2nd. It is possible that
your update missed it, but it sounds unlikely...
Icky stuff, these virii.
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: "Tanya Mayer Photography" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2004 9:20 PM
Subject: RE: clever virus attack (Att. Dalal)
> I don't know which "Outlook 2000" you are referring to, but I a
i think that the mail administrators have removed all options on my work
Outlook except Exchange servers.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: "Rob Brigham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2004 6:32 AM
Subject: RE: clever vi
Go into 'Tools', 'Email Accounts' 'Add a new account' and hey presto it
should show you the options.
> -Original Message-
> From: Herb Chong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 04 March 2004 11:28
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: clever
x27;t contain
any settings for configuring any other type of server.
Herb...
- Original Message -
From: "Jostein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2004 3:44 AM
Subject: Re: clever virus attack (Att. Dalal)
> It does not "depe
March 04, 2004 3:44 AM
Subject: Re: clever virus attack (Att. Dalal)
> It does not "depend on an exchange server". Outlook can be configured to
> use perfectly ordinary SMTP servers, IMAP servers, POP3 servers, and the
> secure variants. During installation you get all the neces
e more creative variants in the future,
unfortunately.
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: "Tanya Mayer Photography" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2004 12:21 AM
Subject: RE: clever virus attack (Att. Dalal)
>
> Hey
no
substitute for a good measure of caution.
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: "Herb Chong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2004 2:58 AM
Subject: Re: clever virus attack (Att. Dalal)
> i seriously doubt you are running
y" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2004 9:20 PM
Subject: RE: clever virus attack (Att. Dalal)
> I don't know which "Outlook 2000" you are referring to, but I assure you
> that when I go to the "Help" menu and cl
From: "Anthony Farr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> It just means Mark Dalal's address is in the infected computer's address
> book.
Are you sure? I can't seem to find a virus on my computer but I want to be
sure before I go emailing people.
Thanks,
Mark
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 4 March 2004 11:59 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: clever virus attack (Att. Dalal)
i seriously doubt you are running Outlook 2000. the program depends on an
Exchange server running on a separate machine for handling mail and is
designed for medium to
, March 03, 2004 6:21 PM
Subject: RE: clever virus attack (Att. Dalal)
>
> Hey guys, I just went to the microsoft site to download the patch and
> discovered that it varies depending on the Outlook Express version you are
> running. This is fine, BUT, I am running Microsoft Outlook 2000
It just means Mark Dalal's address is in the infected computer's address
book.
regards,
Anthony Farr
- Original Message -
From: "Lasse Karlsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Got one too a few hours ago.
> Mark Dalal's email address noted as sender in the mailinfo ..
>
(snip)
Gee, I was thinking the same thing. If you want a client with a
similar interface, try The Bat (www.ritlabs.com). I have had way
fewer problems in general since getting away from MS Outlook Express.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Wednesday, March 3, 2004, 3:36:11 PM, you wrote:
MR> "Tanya Mayer Phot
Got one too a few hours ago.
Mark Dalal's email address noted as sender in the mailinfo (while the sender in my
reader gave a "noreply" + my isp as sender). Whether it means Mark is infected, or
just got his address stolen I don't know.
(The same password that others reported).
Just deleted it.
M
22 matches
Mail list logo
