Absolutely! I use one on my AF500FTZ almost all the time.
Len
---
* There's no place like 127.0.0.1
btw: is Stofen omnibounce available for AF500FTZ?
I've built myself one from an empty polypropylene shampoo bottle...looks
weird, works remarkably well also with 14mm or fisheye (on film too)!
If
Well I do think it would have done better if shot in
raw mode, but Phil really like the *istD, that says
something. He went out of his way to mention the
sarpening cn be done out of camera to.
--- Robert Gonzalez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Its about time. At least it got the "highly
> recommen
Its about time. At least it got the "highly recommended" rating, not
that people pay that much attention anymore. The reviews have been
accused of being biased towards Canon.
Alexandru-Cristian Sarbu wrote:
You should check dpreview - it's there!
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/pentaxistd/
A
It is one of the things that I really like about the *ist D, and actually I
really got to use it most recently with the camera and am getting a
workflow...
I rarely use the Auto setting, but I do use the select on the non-center
spot, and when I have to I use the center I just spin the dial. Afte
ginal Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 8:33 PM
Subject: Re: istD review - finally
> I've been using mine set to the center AF point most of the time. I find
it
> easier to focus and recompose in my usual sh
Reading the review, I wonder how the camera determines which AF point to
choose for the AF system.
Does the camera always makes the correct choice?
On Tue, 2003-10-28 at 14:23, Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote:
> on 28.10.03 13:43, Alexandru-Cristian Sarbu at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > You should che
>
> You should check dpreview - it's there!
> http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/pentaxistd/
>
> Alex Sarbu
At last a comprehensive review on the *ist D has finally filtered through!
It is a pretty extensive and balanced review, I am glad he used the FA
50mm 1.4 lens in the tests but would have li
Sylwester Pietrzyk schrieb:
>
> on 28.10.03 13:43, Alexandru-Cristian Sarbu at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > You should check dpreview - it's there!
> > http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/pentaxistd/
> *SNIP* ...performed
> poorer than *XYZ* in dark places (also I've noticed, that it usually
> fo
on 28.10.03 13:43, Alexandru-Cristian Sarbu at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> You should check dpreview - it's there!
> http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/pentaxistd/
Nice to see that *istD performs so well! There are few small grips, but for
first, real DSLR very good results overall! And AFAIK - it was
9 matches
Mail list logo
