On 9/14/06 12:51 AM, P. J. Alling, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since they claim and extra stop in SR over the K100D maybe that's where
the extra stop is coming from.
According to a Japanese article, extra stop comes from more robust
magnet/coil over K100D's and the improved SR algorithm.
Ken
On 13/9/06, Adam Maas, discombobulated, unleashed:
While I generally agree, I found the Pentax DSLR's to produce very
film-like results at high ISO's. The Canon and Nikon's are more
objectionable (Although my D50 is extremely clean at 800).
And for those who don't find it objectionable:
I quit like that don't find it objectionable at all.
Sometimes I forget how good a snapper you are.
:-)
Dave
At 03:18 PM 14/09/2006, you wrote:
On 13/9/06, Adam Maas, discombobulated, unleashed:
While I generally agree, I found the Pentax DSLR's to produce very
film-like results at high
On 14/9/06, David Savage, discombobulated, unleashed:
Sometimes I forget how good a snapper you are.
You can simulate my aperture any time you like.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
The temptation.
But I wouldn't do that.
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 14/9/06, David Savage, discombobulated, unleashed:
Sometimes I forget how good a slapper you are.
You can stimulate my aperture any time you like.
-
Email sent
On 9/14/06, mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The temptation.
But I wouldn't do that.
Since when?
Go for it ;-)
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 14/9/06, David Savage, discombobulated, unleashed:
Sometimes I forget how good a slapper you are.
You can stimulate my
On 9/14/06, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 14/9/06, David Savage, discombobulated, unleashed:
Sometimes I forget how good a snapper you are.
You can simulate my aperture any time you like.
Good thing I just finished my drink...
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
.. or so says Pentax Imaging.
http://tinyurl.com/gulfl
Shel
And if you click on Specifications, it goes to 1600.
-Adam
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
.. or so says Pentax Imaging.
http://tinyurl.com/gulfl
Shel
And if you click on Specifications, it goes to 1600.
And if you read at the bottom, it says Specifications are subject to
change. LOL.
-Adam
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
that it only goes down to
200. I'm looking forward to having 100iso on the K10D.
- Original Message -
From: Gonz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 11:51 AM
Subject: Re: K10D ISO 3200 is Available ...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
I don't know about the DL but I find on the D ISO 1600 3200 are very
usable. Especially with the judicious use of noise reduction software in PP.
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/PESO/peso_1.htm
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Noise%20Test/Misc_008.htm
Sometimes it's the difference between
It's definitely a horses for courses thing. I like film grain, but really
dislike digital noise.
- Original Message -
From: David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 12:08 PM
Subject: Re: K10D ISO 3200 is Available
-
From: Gonz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 11:51 AM
Subject: Re: K10D ISO 3200 is Available ...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
.. or so says Pentax Imaging.
http://tinyurl.com/gulfl
Shel
, but really
dislike digital noise.
- Original Message -
From: David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 12:08 PM
Subject: Re: K10D ISO 3200 is Available ...
I don't know about the DL but I find on the D ISO 1600 3200
Sensitivity equivalent...
Since they claim and extra stop in SR over the K100D maybe that's where
the extra stop is coming from. I didn't see it in the preview of the
Custom Menu on the dpreview site.
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
.. or so says Pentax Imaging.
http://tinyurl.com/gulfl
Shel
Most complaints about excessive noise at reasonable ISO settings are,
in my experience, almost always due to underexposure.
Digital exposure evaluation should be predicated on getting as much
exposure as possible without saturating the pixels where you want
detail in the highlights, and
16 matches
Mail list logo
