Oh dear. Please no. Not here.
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 2:09 PM, Paul Sorenson wrote:
> They're quickly picked and brought inside for consumption...
>
>
>
> On 9/27/2017 11:39 AM, Jostein wrote:
>>
>> I hear there used to be a lot more of them on the lawn outside the white
>>
They're quickly picked and brought inside for consumption...
On 9/27/2017 11:39 AM, Jostein wrote:
I hear there used to be a lot more of them on the lawn outside the
white house. :-D
Jostein
Den 26.09.2017 19:23, skrev Collin Brendemuehl:
I hear that in some areas of the country mushrooms
I hear there used to be a lot more of them on the lawn outside the white
house. :-D
Jostein
Den 26.09.2017 19:23, skrev Collin Brendemuehl:
I hear that in some areas of the country mushrooms also disappear rather
quickly.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Especially the magic kind. :)
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 1:23 PM, Collin Brendemuehl
wrote:
> I hear that in some areas of the country mushrooms also disappear rather
> quickly.
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
>
I hear that in some areas of the country mushrooms also disappear rather
quickly.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
There is a Wikipedia article on rolling shutter effect covers it pretty
well. You can also see it on the Q series when using a lens without a
leaf shutter, like a K mount lens on a simple adapter. since the Q
defaults to an electronic shutter for lenses without leaf shutters.
I tried several
If you're hungry, they grow real slow.
Jostein
Den 25.09.2017 23:18, skrev Zos Xavius:
I bet they could image them now in real time. Mushrooms do grow
astoundingly fast. Just watch some time-lapses sometime.
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 2:23 AM, David Mann wrote:
On Sep 25,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pTSkRIw1m60
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 2:23 AM, David Mann wrote:
> On Sep 25, 2017, at 12:21 PM, Mark C wrote:
>
>> Aside from banding the problem with ambient light is that there can be a
>> surprising amount of movement
I bet they could image them now in real time. Mushrooms do grow
astoundingly fast. Just watch some time-lapses sometime.
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 2:23 AM, David Mann wrote:
> On Sep 25, 2017, at 12:21 PM, Mark C wrote:
>
>> Aside from banding the
I definitely see the point. At 10X the DOF is like, 2-3 µm. Vibrations
of just half of that would cause significant blur.
Jostein
Den 25.09.2017 08:23, skrev David Mann:
On Sep 25, 2017, at 12:21 PM, Mark C wrote:
Aside from banding the problem with ambient light is
LOL well I hardly expected the first to figure it out. How nice that
Pentax has evolved the feature in K-1.
I'm too new to the method to actually be able to recognise what the
rolling shutter issue is about, I think. I use some el cheapo LED lights
from IKEA (Like this one:
On Sep 25, 2017, at 12:21 PM, Mark C wrote:
> Aside from banding the problem with ambient light is that there can be a
> surprising amount of movement in subjects due to minor air currents or
> vibration.
Many moons ago I visited a lab that produced holograms. They
You can also set the K1 to use an electronic shutter in live view mode,
no pixel shift.
With the camera set to 3 second delay and electronic shutter, you can
minimize any kind of shutter shake almost as effectively as using flash
and minimizing / eliminating ambient light. But I found that
Hey, I posted my latest story of equipment destruction, no one commented
on that. Heck, I thought it was funny.
On 9/24/2017 4:51 AM, Jostein wrote:
Eerily quiet from the List, so here's to check the throughput of the
transatlantic fibreoptics and whatnot.
In my enduring foray into extreme
14 matches
Mail list logo