Ann,
Your input is appreciated.
Fortunately I won’t need it to survive. Just hoping that my fun hobby produces
a few $$ to compensate. I find the time minimal (for Shutterstock) when I have
shot a lot of similar-class but different images. That meant time/count, and
worked out well. Time spent
One problem is that the amount of work you need to do just to submit is
very time consuming. For another, most of the money that
is more than a pittance if it sells is for commercial use and you have
to have releases for people and pets and even homes or other
edifices. The quality of the i
Steve Cottrell wrote:
> I don’t know if I would recommend themm but there’s a UK agency called Alamy
> that I used to have images lodged with. In my experience, one has to have
> literally thousands of images up to make any decent money.
>
> Cotty
That’s my goal. To go through all my decades ol
I don’t know if I would recommend themm but there’s a UK agency called Alamy
that I used to have images lodged with. In my experience, one has to have
literally thousands of images up to make any decent money.
Cotty
On 15 Jan 2023, at 17:49, coll...@brendemuehl.net wrote:
What other agencies
sadly, acceptance for listing doesn't mean sales.. I was in ANIMALS
ANIMALS/ EARTH SCENES for years - sold some photos, but the work
required to satisfy their standards for detail was taxing.. this was
back pre digital. I'm officially still with them but have not given
them anything in ye
5 matches
Mail list logo
