In a message dated 1/18/2003 8:01:21 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
for me the photo is far more important. anything i use is to give me what i
envisioned when i was at the location. the equipment's job is to give me
the control i need without getting in the way,
In a message dated 1/18/2003 5:42:20 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Aw, bless her. Makes me want to give her a big hug :-)
Cotty
All I can say is that I am glad that naivete is huggable.
Doe aka Marnie Rather than just plain annoying. ;-)
In a message dated 1/19/2003 6:44:20 AM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Unlike Mike I wouldn't really recommend to start with $400
4MP
digips.
I wouldn't either. I made a big long post responding to all Mike's later points,
including that one and it has not shown up on the
In a message dated 1/18/2003 1:58:00 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
This is why they came up with Polaroid backs. I've seen photographers
and clients spending quite a bit of time studying them, with a loupe,
checking details. A big advantage of digital is that if that
In a message dated 1/18/2003 11:33:34 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What really bothers me about the whole film vs. digital question FOR ME
PERSONALLY--I mean as it works itself out and manifests itself in my own
photographic work--is that I'm coming to believe that I
Message text written by INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For me, the equipment is important. If all I cared about was the
photograph then I would do better to get a good color copier and just
make copies of other people's work.
I hope this makes sense. The photo is important, but is just as
important
Same here my friend.g
Dave(sorry but thinking of adding an F4 to go with the D1 stuff)
Brooks(but keeping the Pentax too)g
Begin Original Message
From: T Rittenhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
However, there is a part of me that sings when I make a good
picture, and I
do like it when someone
7 matches
Mail list logo
