> On 10 November 2022 at 18:50 Bob Pdml wrote:
>
>
> 1958/59 Pentax S with probably its original Takumar 55/2.2 lens. There’s a
> write-up and a couple of reviews on Pentaxforums.
Yes. I picked up one of those during my collecting phase. Still have it,
although mine's silver.
Cheers
Brian
> On Nov 10, 2022, at 6:39 AM, coll...@brendemuehl.net wrote:
>
> That would an M39 mount, wouldn’t it?
M42 I expect
--
Larry Colen
l...@red4est.com. sent from Mirkwood
--
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the
I use to have one of those. Yellow colour caused by ThO2 so not all that
dangerous.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/wisselstroom/52491228768/
Alan C
On 10-Nov-22 03:37 PM, Henk Terhell wrote:
Perhaps somebody eagerly wants a radioactive lens, noting the yellowish
cast?
Henk
Op do 10 nov.
No
> On 10 Nov 2022, at 14:39, coll...@brendemuehl.net wrote:
>
> That would an M39 mount, wouldn’t it?
> --
> %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
> the
That would an M39 mount, wouldn’t it?
--
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
Perhaps somebody eagerly wants a radioactive lens, noting the yellowish
cast?
Henk
Op do 10 nov. 2022 om 08:50 schreef Bob Pdml :
> 1958/59 Pentax S with probably its original Takumar 55/2.2 lens. There’s a
> write-up and a couple of reviews on Pentaxforums.
>
> > On 9 Nov 2022, at 17:50,
1958/59 Pentax S with probably its original Takumar 55/2.2 lens. There’s a
write-up and a couple of reviews on Pentaxforums.
> On 9 Nov 2022, at 17:50, coll...@brendemuehl.net wrote:
>
> https://shopgoodwill.com/item/154526031
>
> I’m guessing the collectors will know.
> --
>
--
7 matches
Mail list logo
