Re: Re[2]: What would you do with a 24x36 digital chip?

On 11 Jan 2004 at 10:20, Bruce Dayton wrote: > I wouldn't be surprised to see 67 have a stronger presence than 645 a > few years down the road. > > This is not just a Pentax issue. I predict that 67 and larger will do > better than 645/66 in the film arena. The 645 that survives will be > digit

Re: Re[2]: What would you do with a 24x36 digital chip?

- Original Message - From: "Bruce Dayton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > This is not just a Pentax issue. I predict that 67 and larger will do > better than 645/66 in the film arena. The 645 that survives will be > digital with better resolution than full frame 35mm. That seems to be what Hass

Re[2]: What would you do with a 24x36 digital chip?

Seems to me that DSLR's are making a serious inroad to the 645/66 area. A significant portion of the users of those systems shoot weddings and portraits. Digital works quite well there. Those who are shooting landscape/scenics might opt for a bigger format - either 67, 69 or 4X5. I wouldn't be