Re: Re[2]: law and image

2002-10-27 Thread Jan van Wijk
Hi Brad, On Sat, 26 Oct 2002 16:23:27 -0400, Brad Dobo wrote: I hear a lot of Nikon and Epson. I just wonder about how many people here that own a digital Pentax product (Optios) invest large sums of money in the so-called digital darkroom area. From what I gather, those that speak about

Re: Re[2]: law and image

2002-10-27 Thread Brad Dobo
:18 AM Subject: Re: Re[2]: law and image Hi Brad, On Sat, 26 Oct 2002 16:23:27 -0400, Brad Dobo wrote: I hear a lot of Nikon and Epson. I just wonder about how many people here that own a digital Pentax product (Optios) invest large sums of money in the so-called digital darkroom area

Re: Re[2]: law and image

2002-10-27 Thread Alan Chan
I hear a lot of Nikon and Epson. I just wonder about how many people here that own a digital Pentax product (Optios) invest large sums of money in the so-called digital darkroom area. From what I gather, those that speak about Epson and Nikon and Canon are not using Pentax cameras. Just some

Re[2]: law and image

2002-10-25 Thread Bob Walkden
Hi, I have some personal experience similar to this from a civilian's standpoint. In my other life as an IT person I was at one time in charge of the financial systems at a company I worked for here in England. One of the employees was prosecuted for stealing large amounts of cash. Computer-based

Re[2]: law and image

2002-10-25 Thread gfen
On Fri, 25 Oct 2002, Bob Walkden wrote: months ago. The recent thread on whether or not to have a FAQ could profitably be extended to include a FAC - Frequently-Argued Crap. We As the designated FAQ writer, I'll be glad to include this topic as well. :) I realized as I was writing the other