Thanks for your first hand knowledge, Stan and Paul. It seems to be a
very good teleconverter indeed.
Carlos
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions
My experience with the HD 1.4 X converter reflects Stan’s. It doesn’t get in
the way. Worth every penny, In my opinion.
Paul
> On Feb 25, 2015, at 11:03 AM, Stanley Halpin
> wrote:
>
> Carlos - that is correct, I was referring to the new HD 1.4x.
>
> I have not done any laboratory bench-tests
Carlos - that is correct, I was referring to the new HD 1.4x.
I have not done any laboratory bench-tests etc. with this lens + converter so I
can’t give definitive answers. I suspect that if you work from a tripod,
mirror-up, remote trigger with appropriately high-enough shutter speed, you
migh
Hi Stan. I suppose that the 1.4 extender you used with your 50-135 is
the new HD 1.4 converter. If that's the case, how do you find the
resulting IQ and focusing speed of the HD 1.4x + 50-135mm combo? I am
mulling the purchase of that converter to use it mainly with the
mentioned lens and your
Stan,
That's an interesting post to read.
I am also frequently facing the decision of what lenses to take on a
particular trip (as many of people here do), but with somewhat different
constraints and "boundary conditions". In most cases, I am limited to what
fits in the bag that qualifies as
I am just back from a three-week trip which included some time in Argentina, an
Antarctica drive-by, etc. During my preparations I agonized over my lens
choices; I wanted to take a minimal kit without jeopardizing my chance of
getting a once-in-a-lifetime shot in the alleyways of Buenos Aires, t
6 matches
Mail list logo
