: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Emne: RE: SMC Pentax-A* 135mm 1:1.8 vs. Voigtländer 125mm F2.5 SL
Hi Rob
You did a nice and informative job with that comparison, thanks.
The clickable photo map is very cool!
greetings
Markus
A month or two back I mentioned to the list that I had tested the
SMC Pentax
Resent, original post was from 10 Feb 04
Hi team,
A month or two back I mentioned to the list that I had tested the SMC Pentax-A*
135mm 1:1.8 against the Voigtländer Macro APO-Lanthar 125mm F2.5 SL on the *ist
D and that I would publish the results. Well I did format them to be posted to
the
So, Rob, what is your overall opinion of the
Voigtlander lens? Would you say it compares favorably
to the Pentax lens?
Thanks for your efforts to test the lens!
--- Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Resent, original post was from 10 Feb 04
Hi team,
A month or two back I mentioned to
Hi Rob
You did a nice and informative job with that comparison, thanks.
The clickable photo map is very cool!
greetings
Markus
A month or two back I mentioned to the list that I had tested the
SMC Pentax-A*
135mm 1:1.8 against the Voigtländer Macro APO-Lanthar 125mm F2.5
SL on the *ist
D and
www.cameraquest.com
At 11:40 PM 2/19/04, you wrote:
Wow!
So where can I get one. I don't think I've ever seen a Voigtlander lens
in a shop in Canada.
-Scott
On Mon, 2004-02-09 at 18:48, Rob Studdert wrote:
Hi team,
A month or two back I mentioned to the list that I had tested the SMC
Wow!
So where can I get one. I don't think I've ever seen a Voigtlander lens
in a shop in Canada.
-Scott
On Mon, 2004-02-09 at 18:48, Rob Studdert wrote:
Hi team,
A month or two back I mentioned to the list that I had tested the SMC Pentax-A*
135mm 1:1.8 against the Voigtländer Macro
Hi team,
A month or two back I mentioned to the list that I had tested the SMC Pentax-A*
135mm 1:1.8 against the Voigtländer Macro APO-Lanthar 125mm F2.5 SL on the *ist
D and that I would publish the results. Well I did format them to be posted to
the Pentax lens test site however I forgot
Omg! Rob those results make the Pentax-A 135mm look like a piece of CRAP!!!
tan.
- Original Message -
From: Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2004 12:48 PM
Subject: SMC Pentax-A* 135mm 1:1.8 vs. Voigtländer 125mm F2.5 SL
Hi team
On 10 Feb 2004 at 12:04, Tanya Mayer Photography wrote:
Omg! Rob those results make the Pentax-A 135mm look like a piece of CRAP!!!
Hi Tan,
It's all in your perspective. It just proves that the V is superb but the P is
infinitely better at f1.8 too :-)
Cheers,
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE
Hmmm, right you are Rob - the glass is half full! lol...
Now where can I get my hands on one of those Voightlander lenses... vbg
tan.
Hi Tan,
It's all in your perspective. It just proves that the V is superb but the
P is
infinitely better at f1.8 too :-)
Cheers,
Rob Studdert
I am surprised by the comparative performance of the Pentax - it looks
nearly unusable until f5.6, as opposed to the Voigtlander which is
fairly sharp at f2.5. Maybe the Pentax is optimized for a different
subject distance - or is that even possible?
The A*135/1.8 is not carp, just that the SL125/2.5 is too good. Who said
Cosina makes cheap lenses?! :-)
Regards,
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
Omg! Rob those results make the Pentax-A 135mm look like a piece of CRAP!!!
tan.
Okay, I said it before, and I am saying it again. Rob, you are driving me
mad!!! vbg
Regards,
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
A month or two back I mentioned to the list that I had tested the SMC
Pentax-A*
135mm 1:1.8 against the Voigtländer Macro APO-Lanthar 125mm F2.5 SL on the
*ist
13 matches
Mail list logo
