You're all a bunch of goddam communist preverts!
On 15/12/06, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
I am *not* a communist!
Well, that's two of us for the preverts. Any more?
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
Cotty wrote:
You're all a bunch of goddam communist preverts!
On 15/12/06, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
I am *not* a communist!
Well, that's two of us for the preverts. Any more?
Do you know the definition of pervert in North Carolina?
Someone who likes sex more than basketball.
I take exception to that, communist? Hardly.
Cotty wrote:
Holy mackerel that sucker moves about a lot!
Which, the camera or the sensor? ]'-)
And if you were referring to a third alternative, we don't want to
know...
You're all a bunch of goddam communist
Do you know the definition of pervert in North Carolina?
Someone who likes sex more than basketball.
Same for Indiana.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: SR Weirdness
Cotty wrote:
You're all a bunch of goddam communist preverts
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006, J and K Messervy wrote:
I just tested my camera and more often than not, the sensor does not move.
This backs up my experience when trying out SR in photos. I got the
impression it wasn't working much of the time. Turns out it isn't. :(
Make sure that for the testing,
Yes, I used manual mode and sometimes it worked, sometimes it didn't.
- Original Message -
From: Lawrence Kwan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Friday, December 15, 2006 7:45 PM
Subject: Re: SR Weirdness
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006, J and K Messervy wrote:
I
Thinking about this more:
SR is probably only good for up to 1.5 seconds or so. After that,
there's little point to the sensor continuing to move around,
attempting to stabilize. The engineers probably just had it lock to
a certain point after that specified time.
Will it not re-activate
If it takes good pictures when you don't bounce it around, it's
probably fine. I think I'll pass on torture testing mine.
Paul
On Dec 14, 2006, at 11:43 PM, Peter Loveday wrote:
Interesting, after the last big movement it just sort of goes I'm over
it, I'll just rest here in the corner for a
From: Peter Loveday [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/12/15 Fri AM 04:43:47 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: SR Weirdness
Interesting, after the last big movement it just sort of goes I'm over
it, I'll just rest here in the corner for a bit.
Yeah, I wonder
SR doesn't work on B setting, because the camera thinks you're smart
enough to use a tripod.
Paul
On Dec 15, 2006, at 12:31 AM, Mike Hamilton wrote:
That's the second video that I've seen of the SR working. The sensor
moves around quite visibly. I just took a look at my own K10D, Bulb
Peter,
What is normal about an 8-second handheld
exposure???
This sort of thing is what clutters the dpreview
forum!
Rick
--- Peter Loveday [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm still not sure if I should be
returning it or if this
is 'normal'.
http://www.photo.net/photos/RickW
I tend to agree. I'm in the camp that buys a camera to take pictures
with, not calculate theoretics or reverse engineer. ;-)
G
On Dec 15, 2006, at 3:14 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
If it takes good pictures when you don't bounce it around, it's
probably fine. I think I'll pass on torture
SR will do very little to sharpen an 8 second hand-held shot imo.
Godfrey
On Dec 15, 2006, at 6:21 AM, Rick Womer wrote:
Peter,
What is normal about an 8-second handheld
exposure???
This sort of thing is what clutters the dpreview
forum!
Rick
--- Peter Loveday [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You must be new here.
g
On 12/15/06, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I tend to agree. I'm in the camp that buys a camera to take pictures
with, not calculate theoretics or reverse engineer. ;-)
G
On Dec 15, 2006, at 3:14 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
If it takes good pictures when
LOL
I was just testing the image stabilization. Seems to me that I can
get a pretty darn sharp picture with the DA21mm lens at about a half
second exposure time when it's enabled. I could post a pair of
example shots ... but why bother?
Since someone will undoubtedly ask to see it, here ya
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
I'm in the camp that buys a camera to take pictures
with, not calculate theoretics or reverse engineer.
Heretic! BURN 'IM!
;-)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
I'm in the camp that buys a camera to take pictures
with, not calculate theoretics or reverse engineer.
Pffft! Wuss ;-)
-Cory
--
*
* Cory Papenfuss, Ph.D., PPSEL-IA *
*
On 15/12/06, Peter Loveday, discombobulated, unleashed:
I've done a quick video (sorry about the dodgy quality) to illustrate the
sensor popping to a corner and locking issue I'm seeing in SR.
http://www.users.on.net/~ploveday/SRTest.mov (its about 5MB)
Holy mackerel that sucker moves about a
On Dec 15, 2006, at 2:00 PM, Cotty wrote:
I've done a quick video (sorry about the dodgy quality) to
illustrate the
sensor popping to a corner and locking issue I'm seeing in SR.
http://www.users.on.net/~ploveday/SRTest.mov (its about 5MB)
Holy mackerel that sucker moves about a lot!
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Dec 15, 2006, at 2:00 PM, Cotty wrote:
Holy mackerel that sucker moves about a lot!
Which, the camera or the sensor? ]'-)
And if you were referring to a third alternative, we don't want to
know...
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Holy mackerel that sucker moves about a lot!
Which, the camera or the sensor? ]'-)
And if you were referring to a third alternative, we don't want to
know...
You're all a bunch of goddam communist preverts!
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
Cotty wrote:
Holy mackerel that sucker moves about a lot!
Which, the camera or the sensor? ]'-)
And if you were referring to a third alternative, we don't want to
know...
You're all a bunch of goddam communist preverts!
I am *not* a communist!
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
On Dec 15, 2006, at 3:18 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Holy mackerel that sucker moves about a lot!
Which, the camera or the sensor? ]'-)
And if you were referring to a third alternative, we don't want to
know...
You're all a bunch of goddam communist preverts!
I am *not* a communist!
Would
I've done a quick video (sorry about the dodgy quality) to illustrate the
sensor popping to a corner and locking issue I'm seeing in SR.
http://www.users.on.net/~ploveday/SRTest.mov (its about 5MB)
The movement of the camera looks a little exagerated in this video.. I'm not
actually shaking
On 15/12/06, Peter Loveday [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've done a quick video (sorry about the dodgy quality) to illustrate the
sensor popping to a corner and locking issue I'm seeing in SR.
http://www.users.on.net/~ploveday/SRTest.mov (its about 5MB)
The movement of the camera looks a little
Interesting, after the last big movement it just sort of goes I'm over
it, I'll just rest here in the corner for a bit.
Yeah, I wonder if that is it... basically decides its too damn bumpy.
Still, I really would expect it to go to the centre, even if it made such an
choice. Or perhaps if it
On 15/12/06, Peter Loveday [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, I wonder if that is it... basically decides its too damn bumpy.
Still, I really would expect it to go to the centre, even if it made such an
choice. Or perhaps if it hits the stop, it stays there to protect itself?
I dunno, its odd.
If you're shaking the camera that forcibly when making an exposure,
you have more problems than the fact that the SR decides to take a
rest. ;-)
G
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
That's the second video that I've seen of the SR working. The sensor
moves around quite visibly. I just took a look at my own K10D, Bulb
setting, no lens mounted, and there is *no* sensor movement at all! I
hear a gentle buzzing, just like Peter, but I can't see sensor
movement.
On 15/12/06, Mike Hamilton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's the second video that I've seen of the SR working. The sensor
moves around quite visibly. I just took a look at my own K10D, Bulb
setting, no lens mounted, and there is *no* sensor movement at all! I
hear a gentle buzzing, just like
On 12/14/06, Peter Loveday [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You'll see the sensor moving quite happily (its kinda cool to watch if
you've not done so already), then about 2/3rds of the way through the sensor
pops to the lower corner, then never moves again... I'd be interested to
know if anyone else
On 12/14/06, Digital Image Studio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 15/12/06, Mike Hamilton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's the second video that I've seen of the SR working. The sensor
moves around quite visibly. I just took a look at my own K10D, Bulb
setting, no lens mounted, and there is
digital camera.
James
- Original Message -
From: Peter Loveday [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Friday, December 15, 2006 3:12 PM
Subject: SR Weirdness
I've done a quick video (sorry about the dodgy quality) to illustrate the
sensor popping to a corner
On 12/14/06, Mike Hamilton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/14/06, Peter Loveday [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You'll see the sensor moving quite happily (its kinda cool to watch if
you've not done so already), then about 2/3rds of the way through the sensor
pops to the lower corner, then never
Thinking about this more:
SR is probably only good for up to 1.5 seconds or so. After that,
there's little point to the sensor continuing to move around,
attempting to stabilize. The engineers probably just had it lock to a
certain point after that specified time.
Nah, its not time based,
I'll have a play with mine later but I'm really not fussed about have
the sensor exposed to the elements if it's not really necessary so
there won't be any videos. Return to the centre makes sense unless
it's done that way in an effort to effectively anchor the sensor in
order to prevent
36 matches
Mail list logo
