Lasse Karlsson wrote:
> John M. wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 02 Feb 2003 09:41:09 -0500, you wrote:
> >
> > >If I wanted to have an aggravating, pointless discussion, I would
> go
> > >talk to my wife.
> > >
> > >BR
I refrained from replying to Bruce to ask him if I could supply the name
of a good divorc
y 03, 2003 12:17 AM
Subject: Re: Shit, Crap & Politics, Was:Re: Vs: car shit, not politics, not
Pentax, but about as valid as any of the crap that is allowed without
rancor. WAS: bRe: PMA and Pentax DSLR
> We import most of that oil from Venezuela, if what you say is true the US
> should be
cs, Was:Re: Vs: car shit, not politics, not
Pentax, but about as valid as any of the crap that is allowed without
rancor. WAS: bRe: PMA and Pentax DSLR
> Here we go again. These subjects have no place on the PDML. Take them
> off list or flush them where they belong.
Without wanting to be ove
, not politics, not Pentax, but about as valid as any of the
crap that is allowed without rancor. WAS: bRe: PMA and Pentax DSLR
John M. wrote:
> On Sun, 02 Feb 2003 09:41:09 -0500, you wrote:
>
> >If I wanted to have an aggravating, pointless discussion, I would
go
> >talk to my wife.
> >
> >BR
> >
> Geez, BR, you need to get a Pentax wife. Sweet, amenable, easy to
get
> along with - and not too expensive. Not as fast as o
On Sun, 02 Feb 2003 09:41:09 -0500, you wrote:
>If I wanted to have an aggravating, pointless discussion, I would go
>talk to my wife.
>
>BR
>
Geez, BR, you need to get a Pentax wife. Sweet, amenable, easy to get
along with - and not too expensive. Not as fast as other brands,
maybe, but darn eas
AIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, February 02, 2003 5:24 PM
Subject: Re: Shit, Crap & Politics, Was:Re: Vs: car shit, not politics, not
Pentax, but about as valid as any of the crap that is allowed without
rancor. WAS: bRe: PMA and Pentax DSLR
> People used to wonde
Brewer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, February 01, 2003 3:14 PM
Subject: Re: Shit, Crap & Politics, Was:Re: Vs: car shit, not politics, not
Pentax, but about as valid as any of the crap that is allowed without
rancor. WAS: bRe: PMA and Pentax DSLR
If I wanted to have an aggravating, pointless discussion, I would go
talk to my wife.
BR
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would you guys ~please~ take your non-Pentax, non-photography
arguments someplace else... Thanks.
Fred
Would you guys ~please~ take your non-Pentax, non-photography
arguments someplace else... Thanks.
Fred
>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, February 02, 2003 11:28 AM
Subject: Re: Shit, Crap & Politics, Was:Re: Vs: car shit, not politics, not
Pentax, but about as valid as any of the crap that is allowed without
rancor. WAS: bRe: PMA and Pentax DSLR
> Hello Doug,
>
> &g
Archer"
>
> >Subject: Shit, Crap & Politics, Was:Re: Vs: car shit, not politics, not
> >Pentax, but about as valid as any of the crap that is allowed without
> >rancor. WAS: bRe: PMA and Pentax DSLR
> >
> > > Here we go again. These subjects have no
Here we go again. These subjects have no place on the PDML. Take them
off list or flush them where they belong.
On Saturday 01 February 2003 03:43 pm, Raimo Korhonen wrote:
> To raise gasoline prices for 10 cents. Oil companies and producers
> can line their pockets comfortably. And GWB is an o
13 matches
Mail list logo
