- Original Message -
From: Rob Brigham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 9:07 AM
Subject: RE: Opinions wanted: Sigma 24/2.8 super wide II
I would second this. I researched this lens because I was
seriously
considering it second hand. The build
wanted: Sigma 24/2.8 super wide II
I would second this. I researched this lens because I was seriously
considering it second hand. The build of these lenses is 'precarious'
shall we say, and I would not be keen to buy one which has been dropped
- certainly not if it has been self-fixed, who knows
Hi!
I think you've convinced me. I am passing this one on. Unless of
course just a few shots I've made with it come out astoundingly good.
Then I will have to reconsider. But being able to see the distortion
in the viewfinder of my ME Super makes me think that above possibility
is rather remote.
Hi!
I am given the opportunity to buy this lens for about $100 (in local
currency g).
It goes as follows:
1. I'd get circular polarizer and UV filter and also a hood for this
lens.
2. The lens is K-mount with AF that works very find with MZ-5n that I
could handle yesterday.
Unfortunately the
Subject: Opinions wanted: Sigma 24/2.8 super wide II
Hi!
I am given the opportunity to buy this lens for about $100 (in local
currency g).
It goes as follows:
1. I'd get circular polarizer and UV filter and also a hood for this
lens.
2. The lens is K-mount with AF that works very find
Hi,
I recieved my Sigma EX 24mm/1.8 just today. I can't comment on the optical
quality yet (other than no distortion visible), but the mechanical side
could be better. Focusing from 18cm to infinity in a quarter of a twist
takes getting used to since I use only manual focusing gear. The focus
]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 7:06 AM
Subject: Re: Sigma 24/2.8 Super Wide II
Anybody has this lens? How good/bad is it? I'm tempted by the 24 mm, but
I'm not sure about the quality. How is the manual focus? I'm thinking
about buying either this Sigma or a FA 28/2.8 AL
Alan Chan wrote:
I had these Sigma 24mm and 28mm few years back, both
manual focus.
Optically, both are great imho. However, both suffers from
flare problem and
substandard mechanical design, particularly the aperture
ring assembly. The
24mm even had worse rubber, aperture ring material and
Hi there,
Anybody has this lens? How good/bad is it? I'm tempted by the 24 mm, but I'm
not sure about the quality. How is the manual focus?
I'm thinking about buying either this Sigma or a FA 28/2.8 AL. Is the Pentax
lens significantly better?
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
ukasz
Anybody has this lens? How good/bad is it? I'm tempted by the 24 mm, but
I'm not sure about the quality. How is the manual focus? I'm thinking
about buying either this Sigma or a FA 28/2.8 AL. Is the Pentax lens
significantly better?
I had these Sigma 24mm and 28mm few years back, both manual
10 matches
Mail list logo