Ah, thanks Jostein - was starting to worry for a moment.
A.
On 24/8/04 12:54 pm, "Jostein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> Nor has there been any response to the below, despite four copies to the list.
>
> Strange indeed.
>
> LOL!
>
> Jostein
>
> Antonio resent this message for the th
k i l l i f e...
damn.
k i l l f l i e...
um...
OH! you mean the thingy I have installed in my mail client back home! -Well there's
webmail for you... ... I realise it must be too long since I used the home
computer.
Cheers,
Jostein
Gonz wrote:
> LOL. Can you say k i l l f i l e ?
>
> J
LOL. Can you say k i l l f i l e ?
Jostein wrote:
Nor has there been any response to the below, despite four copies to the list.
Strange indeed.
LOL!
Jostein
Antonio resent this message for the third time:
I think something must be wong - I was expecting a whole load of abuse from
Peter and Co
Nor has there been any response to the below, despite four copies to the list.
Strange indeed.
LOL!
Jostein
Antonio resent this message for the third time:
> I think something must be wong - I was expecting a whole load of abuse from
> Peter and Co. and it just hasn¹t materialised. Very st
We'll try it again...
Just got back from a week in Quebec City. Shot almost all architecture stuff
and holiday snaps using a PZ1, MZS and LX. PZ1 was loaded with film, MZS with
slide and LX with SCALA B&W slide film. Lenses included 16, 20,24, 30, 50 85,
120, 28-70,F2.8 (Tokina),28-105 FA Penta
Everybody was complaining about a slow list, missing posts, well now I'm
getting multiple copies of
just about everyones posts and believe me it's difficult to have to read
the same thing from some people twice.
Especially from me!
frank theriault wrote:
--- Norm Baugher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot
I think something must be wong - I was expecting a whole load of abuse from
Peter and Co. and it just hasn¹t materialised. Very strange.
Antonio.
On 21/8/04 10:11 pm, "Amita Guha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Several of my posts from yesterday didn't make it onto
>> the list (checked the archi
Frank Wrote:
Several of my posts from yesterday didn't make it onto
the list (checked the archives, just in case).
The digest is skipping numbers again also :(
Butch
I think something must be wong - I was expecting a whole load of abuse from
Peter and Co. and it just hasn¹t materialised. Very strange.
Antonio.
On 21/8/04 10:11 pm, "Amita Guha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Several of my posts from yesterday didn't make it onto
>> the list (checked the archi
--- Norm Baugher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yep, happens every so often. Antonio and Doug are
> working on it...
It's not that [EMAIL PROTECTED]&*-ing Windows ME again, is it?
&#$@ that &%#%-ing crap!!
Thanks, Norm,
frank
=
"Your first 10,000 photographs are your worst"
"Of
> Several of my posts from yesterday didn't make it onto
> the list (checked the archives, just in case).
>
> Same thing this morning. Several hours later, and
> quite a few posts aren't coming through.
>
> Anyone else in the same boat? I wonder if it's my
> e-mail?
I'm finding that only abou
Yep, happens every so often. Antonio and Doug are working on it...
Norm
frank theriault wrote:
Several of my posts from yesterday didn't make it onto
the list (checked the archives, just in case).
Same thing this morning. Several hours later, and
quite a few posts aren't coming through.
Anyone els
Frank Theriault wrote:
"Several of my posts from yesterday didn't make it onto
the list (checked the archives, just in case).
Same thing this morning. Several hours later, and
quite a few posts aren't coming through.
Anyone else in the same boat? I wonder if it's my
e-mail?
Sigh..."
Maybe it
Several of my posts from yesterday didn't make it onto
the list (checked the archives, just in case).
Same thing this morning. Several hours later, and
quite a few posts aren't coming through.
Anyone else in the same boat? I wonder if it's my
e-mail?
Sigh...
thanks,
frank
=
"Your first
14 matches
Mail list logo
