Re: Strange thing

I didn't even know about that one. What I remember affected manual focus lenses & bodies. But it may have been more or less the same problem, an extra part that caused the lens to get stuck. On 9/7/2022 5:46 PM, Richard Dell wrote: Ricoh added an extra contact pin, which would get "caught"

Re: Strange thing

> On Sep 7, 2022, at 2:38 PM, John Sessoms wrote: > > I vaguely remember there was a problem either with Ricoh cameras or Ricoh > lenses back in film days. They used the K-mount bayonet, but there was > something they did different and either Ricoh lenses would get stuck if you > mounted

Re: Strange thing

I vaguely remember there was a problem either with Ricoh cameras or Ricoh lenses back in film days. They used the K-mount bayonet, but there was something they did different and either Ricoh lenses would get stuck if you mounted them on a Pentax camera or Pentax lenses would get stuck on Ricoh

Re: Strange thing

Hi Godfrey, I hope this gets through to PDML. I’ll send you a picture separately, but I found some photos online of other examples of the M 120/2.8 and they all have the same rear end as mine, so it must be the way it was designed, and the Novoflex adapter hasn’t taken it into account. The

Strange thing

Well, two strange things really. First is an on-topic message from me. Second is an oddity with a Pentax-M 120mm f2.8 lens that I have. If anyone here has one of these, could you please compare the back of it with your other M lenses? I have been doing some informal ‘shoot outs’ with my

Re: Strange thing

That's true but at least I've mitigated the headache for the time being. I'm sending this via newly installed Seamonkey mail client - we'll see how it works. Mark P. J. Alling wrote: Along with bug fixes, a lot of the Thunderbird updates are to fix security issues. No one wants to

Re: Strange thing

I have almost the same excuses for misspelling "grammar". > On 04 July 2017 at 13:40 "P. J. Alling" wrote: > > > It was late at night, I was tired, (I seem to post a lot like that), at > least I wasn't drunk. At least, I don't think I was. > > > On 7/4/2017 2:44

Re: Strange thing

That works! thanks PJ - although it doesn't say "smart reply" it just says "reply list" now.. when I get mail from PDML THANKS much! I feel as you do that the upgrades are probably necessary for safety ann On 7/4/2017 2:22 AM, P. J. Alling wrote: It must be a sign of old age, and I cannot

Re: Strange thing

Along with bug fixes, a lot of the Thunderbird updates are to fix security issues. No one wants to acknowledge security holes in their software, so unless it's one that's become an actual problem with a documented exploit, it probably won't be mentioned in the release notes. I hate to bow

Re: Strange thing

Yea! Uninstalling and re-installing 45.8.0 was super fast and easy and solved the problem. Prior releases are archived by Mozilla here: https://archive.mozilla.org/pub/thunderbird/releases/ On 7/2/2017 1:36 PM, Mark Roberts wrote: Or you can just go back to the previous version of

Re: Strange thing

It was late at night, I was tired, (I seem to post a lot like that), at least I wasn't drunk. At least, I don't think I was. On 7/4/2017 2:44 AM, mike wilson wrote: On 04 July 2017 at 07:22 "P. J. Alling" wrote: It must be a sign of old age, and I cannot

Re: Strange thing

> On 04 July 2017 at 07:22 "P. J. Alling" wrote: > > > It must be a sign of old age, and I cannot remember who on the list put > me on to this, I suppose I could look it up but that's not important now. > > Ann, on the header of an email to the right of the reply

Re: Strange thing

It must be a sign of old age, and I cannot remember who on the list put me on to this, I suppose I could look it up but that's not important now. Ann, on the header of an email to the right of the reply button, right click and choose customize, it should be the only choice you get. That will

Re: Strange thing

Thanks, john - I haven't gotten to reinstalling but will try this version when I do. APpreciate knowing that his version does not show the bug, since part of what I wanted to do was to see how far back to go. Mark On 7/3/2017 6:29 PM, John wrote: On 7/2/2017 13:36, Mark Roberts wrote: Mark

Re: Strange thing

On 7/3/2017 6:50 PM, John wrote: If you drag the "Smart Reply" button to the left in "Customize", it swap the location of the "Reply" and "Reply List" buttons when you click "Done". That might help if you're used to clicking the first button to reply to PDML. I don't think it

Re: Strange thing - and another thing

Right click under the buttons on the message pane & select "Customize" and you can drag the "Smart Reply" button that says "Reply List" when it's not in customization mode to swap places with the "Reply" button and it will stay there when you click [Done]. On 7/3/2017 12:47, John Francis wrote:

Re: Strange thing - Test #3 "Reply All"

Test #3 - "Reply All" goes To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List ... same as "Reply" did. Again, this works with ver. 45.8.0 On 7/3/2017 12:47, John Francis wrote: On Mon, Jul 03, 2017 at 08:55:53AM +0200, Alan C wrote: Correct me if I am wrong. If an email is sent to a list (such as the PDML), &

Re: Strange thing - Test #2 "Reply"

Second Test - ver 45.8.0 "Reply goes To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List On 7/3/2017 12:47, John Francis wrote: On Mon, Jul 03, 2017 at 08:55:53AM +0200, Alan C wrote: Correct me if I am wrong. If an email is sent to a list (such as the PDML), & you use "Reply List" or "Reply All", then you reply

Re: Strange thing - TEST #1 "Reply List"

First Test - I'm still on 45.8.0 so this may not hold for 52.2.1 Reply List goes To: pdml-at-pdml.net On 7/3/2017 12:47, John Francis wrote: On Mon, Jul 03, 2017 at 08:55:53AM +0200, Alan C wrote: Correct me if I am wrong. If an email is sent to a list (such as the PDML), & you use "Reply

Re: Strange thing

my problem is overzealous filtering either by my ISP or the Avast Firewall. Alan C -Original Message- From: Paul in MKE Sent: Monday, July 03, 2017 7:49 AM To: pdml@pdml.net Subject: Re: Strange thing Hmmm. PDML is the only mailing list coming in to T-Bird for me and I have noticed that

Re: Strange thing

On 7/2/2017 19:59, ann sanfedele wrote: my little boxes have REPLY next to REPLY LIST (and to REPLY ALL I have to open and Scroll to box that says Reply list.. I think those buttons are at the top of the "message pane". Top left is a list of folders; Top right has a list of messages; the

Re: Strange thing

ectly from the poster. I think my problem is overzealous filtering either by my ISP or the Avast Firewall. Alan C -Original Message- From: Paul in MKE Sent: Monday, July 03, 2017 7:49 AM To: pdml@pdml.net Subject: Re: Strange thing Hmmm. PDML is the only mailing list coming in

Re: Strange thing

On 7/2/2017 13:36, Mark Roberts wrote: Mark C wrote: I feel your pain, Ann. It seemed that one solution to the "reply to list" issue would be to customize Thunderbird so "reply to list" is on the message toolbar, next to "reply to message". But I've been unable to get that to work - I pull

Re: Strange thing

I'm using Thunderbird, but I'm down-level & haven't "upgraded" to the newer version that's causing all the problems. I'm waiting to see if there's another update that fixes the problems caused by the current update. On 7/2/2017 11:29, ann sanfedele wrote: Will everyone using THunderbird please

Re: Strange thing

Ann, this is not about Thunderbird. ;-) Jostein Den 02.07.2017 17.29, skrev ann sanfedele: Will everyone using THunderbird please raise your hands :-) alan - I still have a problem remembering to hit "REPLY LIST" instead of jsut REPLY - some of the people whose pesos I've commented on , I

Re: Strange thing

That has happened to me for several years already. :-( I looked into routing agreements between providers, but that didn't fit the pattern. An original email from Australia, Russia or the Philippines was just as likely to get lost in space as was the ones from Ohio, Michigan or California.

Re: Strange thing

Maybe. For me there is no difference between Reply and Reply List. As far as I can figure out (and I have double checked). All are going to p...@pdlm.net. My problem is, when I have Thunderbird filter by Threads turned on (may be called something else, forget now I got it turned on), when I

Re: Strange thing

On Mon, Jul 03, 2017 at 08:55:53AM +0200, Alan C wrote: > Correct me if I am wrong. If an email is sent to a list (such as the PDML), > & you use "Reply List" or "Reply All", then you reply goes individually to > all members of the list as well as the list mailbox. If you use "Reply", > then your

Re: Strange thing

Alan C -Original Message- From: Paul in MKE Sent: Monday, July 03, 2017 7:49 AM To: pdml@pdml.net Subject: Re: Strange thing Hmmm. PDML is the only mailing list coming in to T-Bird for me and I have noticed that the Reply to List option is only available for messages from PDML. For othe

Re: Strange thing

Hmmm. PDML is the only mailing list coming in to T-Bird for me and I have noticed that the Reply to List option is only available for messages from PDML. For other messages it's greyed-out. T-Bird seems to know that PDML is a mailing list - -p On 7/2/2017 9:43 PM, Mark C wrote: I tried

Re: Strange thing

Nothing. Super Sparrow was another. Alan C -Original Message- From: Daniel J. Matyola Sent: Sunday, July 02, 2017 9:31 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: Strange thing Check your spam or junk folder; they seem to be winding up there. Dan Matyola http

Re: Strange thing

Now that's a plan - I'll give it a try. On 7/2/2017 1:36 PM, Mark Roberts wrote: Mark C wrote: I feel your pain, Ann. It seemed that one solution to the "reply to list" issue would be to customize Thunderbird so "reply to list" is on the message toolbar, next to "reply to message". But I've

Re: Strange thing

I tried doing that but can't get the customization to stick. I drag it from the customize box and put it next to reply, and it appears to work, but as soon as I close the customize box Reply To List disappears. If I open the customize box again, it reappears, but never stays once customize is

Re: Strange thing

Mine DOES say Reply to list on a button next to Reply - but my mouse finger always hits reply unless I really really concentrate. Don't want to go backwards now - I'm on automatic upgrade - and maybe those security patches they say they are making really are that... I'll get used to it

Re: Strange thing

my little boxes have REPLY next to REPLY LIST (and to REPLY ALL I have to open and Scroll to box that says Reply list.. but remembering that I have to do it for my replies to go to PDML and for my replys to show up in my PDML folder in my inbox, which is where I want 'em. But my mouse just

Re: Strange thing

I've had no problem adding "reply to list" to the Menu toolbar. I just dragged it from the Customize box to a position between Reply and Reply All. In addition, if you usually use the Reply located in the message header you can try this: Open the Customize box for the message header.

Re: Strange thing

Check your spam or junk folder; they seem to be winding up there. Dan Matyola http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola On Sun, Jul 2, 2017 at 12:44 AM, Alan C wrote: > I'm not receiving the original posts some PDMLers (Jack & Marnie at least) > & have to pick them up

Re: Strange thing

Don't know Thunderbird. Presumably "REPLY LIST" & "REPLY" would be the same if there is only 1 address in the original mail? I use Windows Live Mail. Alan C -Original Message- From: ann sanfedele Sent: Sunday, July 02, 2017 5:29 PM To: pdml@pdml.net Su

Re: Strange thing

Mark C wrote: >I feel your pain, Ann. > >It seemed that one solution to the "reply to list" issue would be to >customize Thunderbird so "reply to list" is on the message toolbar, next >to "reply to message". But I've been unable to get that to work - I pull >the reply to list button onto the

Re: Strange thing

Okay, trying it (hitting reply list). Sometimes I am hitting reply which buries my new PESO post in someone else's thread. IE what Ann said. So they are hard to find, sometimes, plus being annoying too. Marnie aka Doe :-O On 7/2/2017 8:29 AM, ann sanfedele wrote: Will everyone using

Re: Strange thing

I feel your pain, Ann. It seemed that one solution to the "reply to list" issue would be to customize Thunderbird so "reply to list" is on the message toolbar, next to "reply to message". But I've been unable to get that to work - I pull the reply to list button onto the tool bar and it looks

Re: Strange thing

Will everyone using THunderbird please raise your hands :-) alan - I still have a problem remembering to hit "REPLY LIST" instead of jsut REPLY - some of the people whose pesos I've commented on , I think, see what i said and reply to me and to list for sake of discussion At the moment I

Strange thing

I'm not receiving the original posts some PDMLers (Jack & Marnie at least) & have to pick them up in comments instead. Alan C --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net

Fine art photography is a strange thing...

I want to say now that I don't remember ever seeing the photograph at the link below, never even heard of the Dusseldorf school. http://theonlinephotographer.typepad.com/.a/6a00df351e888f8834015392f126e9970b-800wi vs mine http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1604247/PESO/PESO%20--%20surfclubmadisonct.html

Re: Fine art photography is a strange thing...

The geometry is strikingly similar as is the effect. In truth, I prefer yours. Paul On Nov 11, 2011, at 10:05 AM, P. J. Alling wrote: I want to say now that I don't remember ever seeing the photograph at the link below, never even heard of the Dusseldorf school.

Re: Fine art photography is a strange thing...

I wouldn't really call your shot derivative. You weren't the first person to angle your shot like that, but neither was the person who shot the picture on that cover. I myself have shot pictures like the lower picture on that cover, and I've never read anything about the Dusseldorf school. On

Re: Fine art photography is a strange thing...

P. J. Alling wrote: I want to say now that I don't remember ever seeing the photograph at the link below, never even heard of the Dusseldorf school. http://theonlinephotographer.typepad.com/.a/6a00df351e888f8834015392f126e9970b-800wi vs mine

Re: Fine art photography is a strange thing...

I prefer yours as well... Bob S. On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 9:15 AM, Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote: The geometry is strikingly similar as is the effect. In truth, I prefer yours. Paul On Nov 11, 2011, at 10:05 AM, P. J. Alling wrote: I want to say now that I don't remember

Re: Fine art photography is a strange thing...

On 11/11/11 11:42 AM, Mark Roberts wrote: P. J. Alling wrote: I want to say now that I don't remember ever seeing the photograph at the link below, never even heard of the Dusseldorf school. http://theonlinephotographer.typepad.com/.a/6a00df351e888f8834015392f126e9970b-800wi vs mine

Re: Fine art photography is a strange thing...

On 11/11/2011 11:42, Mark Roberts wrote: P. J. Alling wrote: I want to say now that I don't remember ever seeing the photograph at the link below, never even heard of the Dusseldorf school. http://theonlinephotographer.typepad.com/.a/6a00df351e888f8834015392f126e9970b-800wi vs mine

Re: Fine art photography is a strange thing...

On 11/11/2011 13:37, Doug Brewer wrote: On 11/11/11 11:42 AM, Mark Roberts wrote: P. J. Alling wrote: I want to say now that I don't remember ever seeing the photograph at the link below, never even heard of the Dusseldorf school.

Re: Fine art photography is a strange thing...

From: P. J. Alling I want to say now that I don't remember ever seeing the photograph at the link below, never even heard of the Dusseldorf school. http://theonlinephotographer.typepad.com/.a/6a00df351e888f8834015392f126e9970b-800wi vs mine

Re: Fine art photography is a strange thing...

On 11/11/2011 1:44 PM, John Sessoms wrote: From: P. J. Alling I want to say now that I don't remember ever seeing the photograph at the link below, never even heard of the Dusseldorf school. http://theonlinephotographer.typepad.com/.a/6a00df351e888f8834015392f126e9970b-800wi vs mine