I believe his *liner-notes* stated he was using a manual macro lens and a macro
converter, right Jens? :-)
Cheers, Christine
On Apr 5, 2012, at 9:46 AM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
Is this the new 40?
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 7:25 AM, Jens p...@planfoto.dk wrote:
Hello Christine, and others
I just got the demo cam from the local distributor/dealer: here's some
quick shots with the K-01 (taken while I was having my car
checked...on my way to the beach so more photos to come).
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bongmanayon/sets/72157629746731527/
I went straight to ISO25600 with the lens I
On Apr 5, 2012, at 4:25 AM, Jens wrote:
Hello Christine, and others who may be intested:
As promised, I will post some test shots, done with the K-01 in this Flickr
set: http://www.flickr.com/photos/bladt/sets/72157629380559984/
The first test shots are macro shots.
Very interesting.
Yes, that's right Cristine.
I own a few macr lenses, but they are all manaul lenses, I'm afraid :-)
Jens
--
Treat others as you would like to be treated yourself.
On Apr 5, 2012 18:01 Christine Aguila christ...@caguila.com wrote:
I believe his *liner-notes* stated he was using a manual macro
Quoting steve harley p...@paper-ape.com:
on 2012-01-17 21:59 Brian Walters wrote
Quoting steve harley:
i suspect an intermediate server is delaying the emails; check the raw
headers ? there should be a time stamp at each server; do you
notice any big
gaps in the timestamps (on the messages
sounds more like slow mail
Philip Northeast
www.aviewfinderdarkly.com.au
On 17/01/12 8:55 AM, Brian Walters wrote:
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012, at 12:55 PM, John Francis wrote:
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 10:56:17PM +1100, Brian Walters wrote:
Hmmm
Well this is getting odder and odder.
Just for
Quoting Philip Northeast rnort...@bigpond.net.au:
sounds more like slow mail
According to Fastmail support I'm hitting their new daily bandwidth
limits. I'm not convinced so I'm still discussing it with them.
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western
on 2012-01-17 16:02 Brian Walters wrote
According to Fastmail support I'm hitting their new daily bandwidth limits. I'm
not convinced so I'm still discussing it with them.
hmm, those limits are pretty high, and it's odd that they would cause a delay
in just one email source ...
i suspect an
Quoting steve harley p...@paper-ape.com:
on 2012-01-17 16:02 Brian Walters wrote
According to Fastmail support I'm hitting their new daily bandwidth
limits. I'm
not convinced so I'm still discussing it with them.
hmm, those limits are pretty high, and it's odd that they would
cause a
on 2012-01-17 21:59 Brian Walters wrote
Quoting steve harley:
i suspect an intermediate server is delaying the emails; check the raw
headers ? there should be a time stamp at each server; do you notice any big
gaps in the timestamps (on the messages that were delayed)?
I'm using Fastmail via
Previous message: Testing...Testing... (again)
Next message: GESO Now with more hatness
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 1/15/12 8:57 PM, Brian Walters wrote:
Sorry for the interruption to your scheduled program
My Fastmail account has stopped
to receive PDML.
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
http://lyons-ryan.org/southernlight/
Doug Brewer doug at alphoto.com
Mon Jan 16 01:58:40 EST 2012
Previous message: Testing...Testing... (again)
Next message: GESO
From: Brian Walters
Sorry for the interruption to your scheduled program
My Fastmail account has stopped receiving PDML mail again. It did the
same thing about a week ago and after about 8 hours I received all of
the day's mail in one hit.
It's a bit odd, especially as my fastmail
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 10:56:17PM +1100, Brian Walters wrote:
Hmmm
Well this is getting odder and odder.
Just for kicks, I set up a second Fastmail account for PDML mail and,
hey presto, it received my reply to Doug. But the original Fastmail
account hasn't.
It's a mystery.
I'll
John Brian,
I've encountered some problems of a different sort with my pdml account.
The pdml email comes to my gmail account and I somehow turned on 'Rich
formatting.'
(I suspect the Virgin America Airlines promo email did it.)
I kept on sending photo comments but never getting any replies.
I
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012, at 12:55 PM, John Francis wrote:
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 10:56:17PM +1100, Brian Walters wrote:
Hmmm
Well this is getting odder and odder.
Just for kicks, I set up a second Fastmail account for PDML mail and,
hey presto, it received my reply to Doug. But the
Sorry for the interruption to your scheduled program
My Fastmail account has stopped receiving PDML mail again. It did the
same thing about a week ago and after about 8 hours I received all of
the day's mail in one hit.
It's a bit odd, especially as my fastmail account seems to be receiving
reply, reply, reply.
Have you checked your spam folder?
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 8:57 PM, Brian Walters supera1...@fastmail.fm wrote:
Sorry for the interruption to your scheduled program
My Fastmail account has stopped receiving PDML mail again. It did the
same thing about a week ago and
We read you loud and clear! Cheers, Christine
On Jan 15, 2012, at 7:57 PM, Brian Walters supera1...@fastmail.fm wrote:
Sorry for the interruption to your scheduled program
My Fastmail account has stopped receiving PDML mail again. It did the
same thing about a week ago and after
Thanks David and Christine.
The only reason I know you replied is because I saw your messages (and
my original post) in the archives. I haven't seen any of those posts in
my Fastmail account.
David, Fastmail (at the base level I use) doesn't have a spam folder so
I should get everything.
It's
On 1/15/12 8:57 PM, Brian Walters wrote:
Sorry for the interruption to your scheduled program
My Fastmail account has stopped receiving PDML mail again. It did the
same thing about a week ago and after about 8 hours I received all of
the day's mail in one hit.
It's a bit odd, especially
From: Brian Walters
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012, at 02:54 PM, steve harley wrote:
on 2012-01-10 22:43 Brian Walters wrote
For some reason my Fastmail account hasn't received any mail for the
past 7 hours but I know there has been list activity because there are
new threads in the archives.
fyi i'm
It got to NY
On 1/11/2012 00:43, Brian Walters wrote:
For some reason my Fastmail account hasn't received any mail for the
past 7 hours but I know there has been list activity because there are
new threads in the archives.
Just testing to see if this makes the list.
Cheers
Brian
on 2012-01-10 22:43 Brian Walters wrote
For some reason my Fastmail account hasn't received any mail for the
past 7 hours but I know there has been list activity because there are
new threads in the archives.
fyi i'm also a Fastmail customer and have had no trouble, though i wasn't using
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012, at 02:54 PM, steve harley wrote:
on 2012-01-10 22:43 Brian Walters wrote
For some reason my Fastmail account hasn't received any mail for the
past 7 hours but I know there has been list activity because there are
new threads in the archives.
fyi i'm also a Fastmail
For some reason my Fastmail account hasn't received any mail for the
past 7 hours but I know there has been list activity because there are
new threads in the archives.
Just testing to see if this makes the list.
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney
Uh Huh…
On Jan 10, 2012, at 21:43 , Brian Walters wrote:
For some reason my Fastmail account hasn't received any mail for the
past 7 hours but I know there has been list activity because there are
new threads in the archives.
Just testing to see if this makes the list.
Joseph McAllister
From: Walter Hamler
Are you using the one provided in the APS folder? I am using it with
my gmail account as well. Now I want to try setting up my regular
email via my Brighthouse roadrunner pop account. Can't figure out how
yet?
Walt
Ought to give road-runner's help desk a call on that.
Testing Fire mail. You may now resume your regular activity.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 10:02 AM, shark50...@gmail.com wrote:
Testing Fire mail. You may now resume your regular activity.
Goody
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly
:
On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 10:02 AM, shark50...@gmail.com wrote:
Testing Fire mail. You may now resume your regular activity.
Goody
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above
From: shark50...@gmail.com
Testing Fire mail. You may now resume your regular activity.
Thank you for your kind permission.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above
On 12/3/2011 10:02 AM, shark50...@gmail.com wrote:
Testing Fire mail. You may now resume your regular activity.
What can I say that hasn't been said already.
--
Don't lose heart! They might want to cut it out, and they'll want to avoid a
lengthily search.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 7:02 AM, shark50...@gmail.com wrote:
Testing Fire mail. You may now resume your regular activity.
Did it burn on the way out?
--
Godfrey
godfreydigiorgi.posterous.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
I tried sending an email with links to photos of some amusing warning signs,
but don't see any evidence of them having gone out,
So I'm trying this test message.
--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Saw your signs and this test.
;-)
cheers,
frank
--- Original Message ---
From: Larry Colen l...@red4est.com
Sent: December 2, 2011 12/2/11
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Testing ... message eaten by the link monster?
I tried sending an email with links to photos of some
Noise Testing
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: Wednesday, August 24, 2011, 6:59 PM
It's occurred to me that many digital
camera tests including the most
popular sites do not give an accurate representation of
noise
generated by the camera sensor(s).
While they may do
From: Paul Stenquist
The K7 is a nice camera in terms of build and ergonomics, but it's a
noisy beast -- no better than the K20 and probably not as good as the
K10. The K5, on the other hand, is by far the best of the Pentax
breed. You won't have any trouble convincing the rest of us that the
K7
On Aug 24, 2011, at 17:59, Tom Cakalic wrote:
I attempted a series of 10 10-sec exposures @ ISO 800 last night with
the K-7. Ambient temperature around 60 degrees F. I had noise
reduction turned off. The camera had been operating for 3 minutes
before starting.
First the camera gave up
On Aug 25, 2011, at 9:19 AM, John Sessoms wrote:
From: Paul Stenquist
The K7 is a nice camera in terms of build and ergonomics, but it's a
noisy beast -- no better than the K20 and probably not as good as the
K10. The K5, on the other hand, is by far the best of the Pentax
breed. You won't
There are still hot pixels in RAW pictures. RAW processors are
usually good at removing them though, so you might think that they
aren't there. LENR modifies the data in the RAW file.
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 7:11 PM, Bruce Walker bruce.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
I hope you are shooting RAW, but
Shoot in RAW, and the Adobe RAW conversion tools (such as what imports the
images into LightRoom - not sure if you use that) will remove all of them
hot pixels for you without any need to fool around with filters and whatnot.
I shoot 2-hour-long concerts at ISO 1250 and when editing I
It's occurred to me that many digital camera tests including the most
popular sites do not give an accurate representation of noise
generated by the camera sensor(s).
While they may do a fairly decent job of reporting on noise at a given
ISO, there seems to be no accounting for length of
On 11-08-24 6:59 PM, Tom Cakalic wrote:
It's occurred to me that many digital camera tests including the most
popular sites do not give an accurate representation of noise
generated by the camera sensor(s).
While they may do a fairly decent job of reporting on noise at a given
ISO, there seems
The K7 is a nice camera in terms of build and ergonomics, but it's a noisy
beast -- no better than the K20 and probably not as good as the K10. The K5, on
the other hand, is by far the best of the Pentax breed. You won't have any
trouble convincing the rest of us that the K7 is noisy.
Paul
On
DXOmark concentrates on sensors and includes noise in the data:
http://www.dxomark.com/index.php/Cameras/Camera-Sensor-Database/Pentax/K5
Click on Specifications tab, then SNR 18%
Now move your cursor over the color bar to the right of the chart. You
should see a crop of a photo with the amount
Most reviewers rated the K20D as slightly less noisy than the K7.
Probably not enough to make a major difference. The rest of the package
made the K7 a better camera.
On 8/24/2011 8:08 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
The K7 is a nice camera in terms of build and ergonomics, but it's a noisy
can you guys open this link? Cheers christine
http://www.caguila.com/test
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
Christine,
Link works fine, trash container planter with T-mobile and Popeye's
across the street.
Hope the pictures look good on the new monitor.
Regards, Bob S.
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 1:27 PM, Christine Aguila christ...@caguila.com wrote:
can you guys open this link? Cheers christine
I can :-)
ann
On 7/25/2011 14:27, Christine Aguila wrote:
can you guys open this link? Cheers christine
http://www.caguila.com/test
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly
Thanks, Bob. The pictures look amazing, much better than the HP monitor. Got
Lightroom 3 set up, so uploaded a test print to my hosting site. Seems to
work. Cheers, Christine
On Jul 25, 2011, at 1:35 PM, Bob Sullivan wrote:
Christine,
Link works fine, trash container planter with
Groovy! Thanks, Ann! Cheers, Christine
On Jul 25, 2011, at 1:50 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
I can :-)
ann
On 7/25/2011 14:27, Christine Aguila wrote:
can you guys open this link? Cheers christine
http://www.caguila.com/test
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
It does work!
And, I loved the overall feeling of your photo.
Bulent
-
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bc_the_path/
http://photo.net/photodb/user?user_id=2226822
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/bulentcelasun
2011/7/25
The link works fine, but the web page looks a bit empty with that tiny
image. G
Dab
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 2:27 PM, Christine Aguila christ...@caguila.com wrote:
can you guys open this link? Cheers christine
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 11:27 AM, Christine Aguila
christ...@caguila.com wrote:
can you guys open this link? Cheers christine
Sure, no problem. Not your greatest photo, however. ;-)
--
Godfrey
godfreydigiorgi.posterous.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Jul 25, 2011, at 2:14 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 11:27 AM, Christine Aguila
christ...@caguila.com wrote:
can you guys open this link? Cheers christine
Not your greatest photo, however. ;-)
Ya, think. ;-) Big cheers, Christine
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
Groovy! Cheers, Christine
On Jul 25, 2011, at 1:58 PM, Bulent Celasun wrote:
It does work!
And, I loved the overall feeling of your photo.
Bulent
-
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bc_the_path/
Worked fine as far as I can tell. Unless it was supposed to do
something other than open a gallery page.
On 7/25/2011 2:27 PM, Christine Aguila wrote:
can you guys open this link? Cheers christine
http://www.caguila.com/test
--
Where's the Kaboom? There was supposed to be an
This is supposed to go out in plain text... according to my option
settings - let me know if you see it someone
thanks
ann
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
I saw it.\
On 7/2/2011 10:50 AM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
This is supposed to go out in plain text... according to my option
settings - let me know if you see it someone
thanks
ann
--
Where's the Kaboom? There was supposed to be an Earth-shattering Kaboom!
--Marvin the Martian.
--
Ann,
Your message to the pdml worked fine.
Bob S.
On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 9:50 AM, Ann Sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com wrote:
This is supposed to go out in plain text... according to my option settings
- let me know if you see it someone
thanks
ann
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Ping.
--Original Message--
From: Ann Sanfedele
Sender: pdml-boun...@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
ReplyTo: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Testing again can you read me now?
Sent: Jul 2, 2011 10:50 AM
This is supposed to go out in plain text... according to my option
settings
I see this! Cheers, Christine
- Original Message -
From: Ann Sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Saturday, July 02, 2011 9:50 AM
Subject: Testing again can you read me now?
This is supposed to go out in plain text... according to my option
Got ya, girl! :-)
G
On Saturday, July 2, 2011, Ann Sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com wrote:
gt; This is supposed to go out in plain text... according to my
option settings - let me know if you see it someone
gt;
gt; thanks
gt; ann
gt;
gt; --
gt; PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
gt; PDML@pdml.net
gt;
Woohoo! You're back! :-)
—M.
\/\/o/\/\ -- http://WorldOfMiserere.com
http://EnticingTheLight.com
A Quest for Photographic Enlightenment
On 2 July 2011 10:50, Ann Sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com wrote:
This is supposed to go out in plain text... according to my option settings
From: Ann Sanfedele
damn -
not seeing what I posted on list
anyone read me out there?
ann
Seeing it in PDML Digest, Vol 62, Issue 192
I'm also on road-runner.
-
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 10.0.1382 / Virus Database: 1513/3718 - Release
It's probably a plot by Wile E. Coyote, super genius.
--Original Message--
From: John Sessoms
Sender: pdml-boun...@pdml.net
To: pdml@pdml.net
To: Ann Sanfedele
ReplyTo: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: RE: testing ...
Sent: Jun 22, 2011 7:21 PM
From: Ann Sanfedele
damn -
not seeing
damn -
not seeing what I posted on list
anyone read me out there?
ann
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
I read you loud and clear. Cheers, Christine
- Original Message -
From: Ann Sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2011 10:30 PM
Subject: testing...
damn -
not seeing what I posted on list
anyone read me out there?
ann
-
From: Ann Sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2011 10:30 PM
Subject: testing...
damn -
not seeing what I posted on list
anyone read me out there?
ann
--
--
http://www.fastmail.fm - Same, same, but different
Gotcha there, good buddy. 10-4
Should get two of these...
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 8:30 PM, Ann Sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com wrote:
damn -
not seeing what I posted on list
anyone read me out there?
ann
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
read you loud and clear
On 6/22/2011 06:30, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
damn -
not seeing what I posted on list
anyone read me out there?
ann
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
On 31/5/11, Philip Northeast, discombobulated, unleashed:
This discussion is rather pointless
MARK.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
-- http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
You're coming through right in the Middle of the East.
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
Middle of the West, too =)
2011/5/31 Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com:
You're coming through right in the Middle of the East.
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly
Vest and yeast come to middle of the mind...
On 5/31/2011 11:04, Ecke PDML wrote:
Middle of the West, too =)
2011/5/31 Boris Libermanbori...@gmail.com:
You're coming through right in the Middle of the East.
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Tue, 31 May 2011 10:04 +0200, Ecke PDML
overpenta...@googlemail.com wrote:
Middle of the West, too =)
...and on the Mainland (Tassie/The Rest joke)
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
http://lyons-ryan.org/southernlight/
2011/5/31
This discussion is rather pointless
Phil
On 31/05/11 7:45 PM, Brian Walters wrote:
On Tue, 31 May 2011 10:04 +0200, Ecke PDML
overpenta...@googlemail.com wrote:
Middle of the West, too =)
...and on the Mainland (Tassie/The Rest joke)
Cheers
Brian
++
--
Philip Northeast
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 2:01 PM, Timber tim...@clancode.hu wrote:
Anyone tried IR photography with the K-5 / K-7 / K-x?
No, but i had very good success with my istD. Mid range ISO settings
and short shutters settings. Sometimes i think i should have kept
mine, but i may steal my sisters from
What kind of modification will you do? Full spectrum or dedicated to IR?
And how's the modded K10D serving you? Did you find any difficulties or
disadvantages? Internal filters are reducing hotspot if I am correct,
but what happens if you have a 1000nm filter on the lens and the 720nm
internal
It's a very nice image.
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 2:01 PM, Timber tim...@clancode.hu wrote:
Hi,
I just made a little test the other day, an unmodified (yet) Pentax K-r
and the infrared photography. What I've found is the K-r has very strong
IR filter (about 20EV) so both high iso handheld and
Hi,
I just made a little test the other day, an unmodified (yet) Pentax K-r
and the infrared photography. What I've found is the K-r has very strong
IR filter (about 20EV) so both high iso handheld and composing the
picture with Live View is impossible. Also using 'False color' IR
filters, such
Anyone tried IR photography with the K-5 / K-7 / K-x?
Regards,
.timber
Nop, only a 720nm modified K10D. But if some cash falls on my head and its not
enough for a 645D I will probably buy another K-5 and have it modified.
kris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On May 6, 2011, at 11:01 AM, Timber wrote:
A few pictures can be found on my flickr stream
( http://www.flickr.com/photos/timbah/5693966320/ ) if you want to see
the results.
Very cool.
Anyone tried IR photography with the K-5 / K-7 / K-x?
No, but I used to put an IR filter over my
Those are really nice, whether true IR or not.
Rick
http://photo.net/photos/RickW
--- On Fri, 5/6/11, Timber tim...@clancode.hu wrote:
From: Timber tim...@clancode.hu
Subject: Testing K-r with Infrared.
To: pdml@pdml.net
Date: Friday, May 6, 2011, 2:01 PM
Hi,
I just made a little test
I just changed my subscription email address, and I just got a *dark horse*
email that Bob W. sent to the list. Looks like I may be back in. Cheers,
Christine
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please
so am I there? Cheers, Christine
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
Yes, you're back in. I had the same problem with my earthlink account
and think it's a problem with their filters. I ended up re-subscribing
under a different account.
-p
On 5/1/2011 1:13 PM, Christine Aguila wrote:
so am I there? Cheers, Christine
--
Being old doesn't seem so old now
On 5/1/11 2:15 PM, Paul Sorenson wrote:
Yes, you're back in. I had the same problem with my earthlink account
and think it's a problem with their filters. I ended up re-subscribing
under a different account.
-p
On 5/1/2011 1:13 PM, Christine Aguila wrote:
so am I there? Cheers, Christine
pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Sunday, May 01, 2011 1:27 PM
Subject: Re: testing . . .
On 5/1/11 2:15 PM, Paul Sorenson wrote:
Yes, you're back in. I had the same problem with my earthlink account
and think it's a problem with their filters. I ended up re-subscribing
under a different account.
-p
On 5/1
thanks, Paul. Cheers, Christine
- Original Message -
From: Paul Sorenson pentax1...@gmail.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Sunday, May 01, 2011 1:15 PM
Subject: Re: testing . . .
Yes, you're back in. I had the same problem with my earthlink account and
think
you are here!
ann
Christine Aguila wrote:
so am I there? Cheers, Christine
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
so am I there? Cheers, Christine
you have entered a parallel universe.
Lord Zrgd of Thwog
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 4:27 PM, Bob W p...@web-options.com wrote:
so am I there? Cheers, Christine
you have entered a parallel universe.
Good. The perpendicular ones suck.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the
I'm not receiving messages from the mailing list, so I'll see if I can
send one.
--
Thanks,
DougF (KG4LMZ)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the
Success. At least on the sending part.
On May 1, 2011, at 10:36 PM, Doug Franklin wrote:
I'm not receiving messages from the mailing list, so I'll see if I can send
one.
--
Thanks,
DougF (KG4LMZ)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
it came through, Doug. Cheers, Christine
- Original Message -
From: Doug Franklin jehosep...@mindspring.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Sunday, May 01, 2011 9:36 PM
Subject: testing
I'm not receiving messages from the mailing list, so I'll see if I can
send
Feeling a little lonely. :-)
--
Thanks,
DougF (KG4LMZ)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
We are always here for you :-)
--
MaritimTim
http://maritimtim.blogspot.com/
2011/4/30 Doug Franklin jehosep...@mindspring.com:
Feeling a little lonely. :-)
--
Thanks,
DougF (KG4LMZ)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to
301 - 400 of 948 matches
Mail list logo
