on 2013-10-06 11:26 Mark Roberts wrote
...but it sells, so I need to be able to teach it to my students.
Hence this experiment.
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/7dd06804-hdr.htm
OMG that's goorjus!
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Quoting steve harley p...@paper-ape.com:
on 2013-10-06 11:26 Mark Roberts wrote
...but it sells, so I need to be able to teach it to my students.
Hence this experiment.
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/7dd06804-hdr.htm
OMG that's goorjus!
Sounds like you're channelling Dick Solomon
For the curious, here's the non-HDR version of my Milan street scene
(just basic Lightroom processing):
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/112-7dd06804.jpg
--
Mark Roberts - Photography Multimedia
www.robertstech.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Not bad, but it really needs to be amped up.
;-)
I think what this really shows is you need to start with a great shot
no matter what you do with it afterward.
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 4:02 PM, Mark Roberts postmas...@robertstech.com wrote:
For the curious, here's the non-HDR version of my
Metal flake paint on velvet was popular back in the day as well. I hate
to admit but I own a small picture in that medium. I even like it but
it's subdued for the genre.
On 10/6/2013 1:33 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
Pretty clear why this kind of image sells; it's very eye-catching. And
you
I liked the HDR version a bit better. You definitely did not overdo it.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 4:02 PM, Mark Roberts postmas...@robertstech.com wrote:
For the curious, here's the non-HDR version of my Milan street scene
(just basic
Finally I could access the page. Overall I like the HDR version better
(not overdone at all), but prefer the light streaks in the non-HDR.
--
Attila
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 11:42 PM, Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com wrote:
I liked the HDR version a bit better. You definitely did not
On 10/7/2013 1:51 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 04:03:39PM +1100, Philip Northeast wrote:
Unfortunately I managed to access the image from Oz, and yes it is
way over the top.
A good example of what not to do.
But he did what he shouldn't very well.
That sounds like
Well, I'll be different and say I like this one better. The other looked
unreal to me. BUT... I would do some recovery in the shadows. Somewhere
between this one and the other one.
HTH, Marnie aka Doe :-)
In a message dated 10/8/2013 1:05:21 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
Well, since you hate it, what are we supposed to say?
Huh, not my kind of thing either. Hey, look, you even have star lights!
Whee!
Heh. Marnie aka Doe ;-) Nice composition? Can say that.
In a message dated 10/6/2013 10:26:36 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
postmas...@robertstech.com writes:
Contrived and unnatural, but in a Thomas Kinkade kind of style. Which,
perhaps, explains the commercial appeal.
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 1:42 AM, eactiv...@aol.com wrote:
Well, since you hate it, what are we supposed to say?
Huh, not my kind of thing either. Hey, look, you even have star
Quoting Mark Roberts postmas...@robertstech.com:
...but it sells, so I need to be able to teach it to my students.
Hence this experiment.
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/7dd06804-hdr.htm
It's not my thing either - but I've seen lots of others that I hate more...
Cheers
Brian
Yikes!
Mark,
I hope you also tell your students that (a) you hate it too
and (b) it is a good example of what good photographers (like you)
don't do and don't need to do.
Please show image before you mangled it
ann
On 10/7/2013 08:08, Brian Walters wrote:
Quoting Mark Roberts
...but it sells, so I need to be able to teach it to my students.
Hence this experiment.
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/7dd06804-hdr.htm
Pseudo-HDR treatment (it's tone mapped from a single exposure). Lots
of tweaking with masks, selective noise reduction and other tricks to
make look more like
Pretty clear why this kind of image sells; it's very eye-catching. And
you managed to do it without that kind of crinkly edges look.
After producing this, do you feel dirty now? ;-)
On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 1:26 PM, Mark Roberts postmas...@robertstech.com wrote:
...but it sells, so I need to be
Bruce Walker wrote:
Pretty clear why this kind of image sells; it's very eye-catching. And
you managed to do it without that kind of crinkly edges look.
After producing this, do you feel dirty now? ;-)
We'll see. I'm going to put it in my NAPP portfolio because they seem
to love
On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 1:53 PM, Mark Roberts postmas...@robertstech.com wrote:
Bruce Walker wrote:
Pretty clear why this kind of image sells; it's very eye-catching. And
you managed to do it without that kind of crinkly edges look.
After producing this, do you feel dirty now? ;-)
We'll see.
On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 8:26 PM, Mark Roberts postmas...@robertstech.com wrote:
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/7dd06804-hdr.htm
Ooops...
Sorry, you are not permitted to access this material. This is usually
because of excessive hacking/spaming/probes from your general IP
space. If you wish to
You may hate it but you have done an effective job with it. Very interesting
scene.
--
Bruce
--
Sent from Sony Tablet S
Mark Roberts postmas...@robertstech.com wrote:
...but it sells, so I need to be able to teach it to my students.
Hence this experiment.
I would look except that you rather isolationist policy of blocking
foreign IP addresses prevents from me from doing so - do you really
have to be so paranoid?
Alastair
On 7 October 2013 16:57, Bruce bkday...@daytonphoto.com wrote:
You may hate it but you have done an effective job with it.
Unfortunately I managed to access the image from Oz, and yes it is way
over the top.
A good example of what not to do.
Philip Northeast
www.aviewfinderdarkly.com.au
On 7/10/13 3:56 PM, Alastair Robertson wrote:
I would look except that you rather isolationist policy of blocking
foreign IP
On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 04:03:39PM +1100, Philip Northeast wrote:
Unfortunately I managed to access the image from Oz, and yes it is
way over the top.
A good example of what not to do.
But he did what he shouldn't very well.
Philip Northeast
www.aviewfinderdarkly.com.au
On
22 matches
Mail list logo
