Dear list members,
I got the FA 28-105 f/3.2-4.5 AL (IF) yesterday and here comes the votes
from the swedish jury (oups sorry, an inter-euro joke).
I won't comment on optical performance, since I haven't shot a single
roll with it yet.

* Design and build quality
It's incredible small! It's amazing that Pentax has suceeded in
designing a 28-105 lens with a 58mm filter thread and f/3.2 aperture! My
Tokina 28-105 was a f/3.5-4.5 lens with 62mm filter thread.
It's almost of the same size as the FA 28-80 f/3.5-4.5 - or just little
bit bigger than the tiny 28-70 f/4 AL. It do extends quite much when
zoomed out to 105, but at 28 it's hard to believe that this is a 28-105
lens.

The zooming collar has the same design as on the 27-70 f/4 or the new
24-90. It's slightly heavier to turn than the 28-70, but it's more
optics to move also...

It's much lighter than my Tokina and balances very well on my MZ-bodies
(5N and 10), even without the FG battery pack (which was a must with the
Tokina attached).

It has a plastic outside, but the lens mount is metal. It lacks the
focusing window of past FA-lenses. Instead the distance info is printed
on the outside of the focus ring (as on the FA28-80 f/3.5-5.6 and
24-90). The aperture ring is wide and easy to turn, much more pleasant
than the tiny and stiff aperture ring on my Tokina. Sadly, the aperture
numbers are not engraved on the ring - they're just printed and the
paint may scratch off with time (but only time will tell).
Overall, the lens feels solid. Nothing feels loose, nothing rattles. The
focusing ring feels more damped than on the 28-70 f/4. I rate the build
quality slightly higher than the 28-70 f/4.

The lens hoods "clicks" easily into place and feels very good. When
removing a plastic cover underneath, one gets a "window" so you can
turn, for example, a polarizer without removing the hood. (something
that's impossible with my Sigma AF 24 f/2.8 and it's "clip-on" hood).

* Autofocus
It sounds! Perhaps this has to do with the more damped focusing ring
than the FA 28-70 f/4 or the Tokina 28-105. Maybe the sound will lower
itself with time. But straight-out-of-the-box the whirr-sound is
unpleasant.

The AF speed seems slightly slower than the 28-70 f/4 (in bright
conditions, this may change at lower light levels where the wider
aperture of the 28-105 is likely to help the AF), but it feels quite
secure.

* Final conclusion
A well made and compact lens that's well suited to travelling.
I hope it performs as good as it looks.
Mounted to my MZ bodies, the lens looks very nice indeed. I like it's
silvery-finish with black lettering.

It cost me 3085:- SEK and I bought it from Scandinavian Photo.

Best regards,
--
Roland Mabo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.algonet.se/~rolamo



-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .

Reply via email to