On 8 Nov 2003 at 22:22, jmb wrote:
Strange. . .
I have used my LX for ~20 years and my E10 for 1. I've never noticed
that the E10 VF was cr*p! Is it because I wear glasses or that it's
usually overcast here in NE Ohio?
Put them side by side and you can tell the difference, I do have the
I picked up an E-1 in the store the other day.
Yuck all around. The view through the viewfinder
was like death (light at the end of a tunnel).
Christian
Put them side by side and you can tell the
difference, I do have the 60 series
screens loaded in my LX though. When using the
LX I can see
- Original Message -
From: Christian
Subject: Re: Viewfinder magnification of DSLRs: *istD best, E-1 und SD9 last
I picked up an E-1 in the store the other day.
Yuck all around. The view through the viewfinder
was like death (light at the end of a tunnel).
Isn't death a tunnel
sorry, how about a near-death experience?
Christian Skofteland
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, November 09, 2003 6:34 PM
Subject: Re: Viewfinder magnification of DSLRs: *istD best, E-1 und SD9 last
Rob Studdert wrote:
The finder on the E-1 better be more impressive than the E-10/20 which really
is crap, it's like looking at the image though a pipe and dark too. Not very
impressive if you are used to good SLR finders.
Strange. . .
I have used my LX for ~20 years and my E10 for 1. I've
Reading the popphoto review of the Oly E-1, I was suprised,
that it was stated, that the E-1 should have the lowest
viewfinder magnification they ever testet.
Looking at the good overview about the D-SLR's at
http://www.photozone.de/2Equipment/digitalSLR.htm
a very good magnification for the
On 24 Oct 2003 at 17:01, Rüdiger Neumann wrote:
It seems that the Pentax is realy designed from scratch as a DSLR.
The Nikon D100 comes from the F80, the Sigma SD9 from the SA9,
that is the reason for the the low viewfinder magnification.
Olympus, which stated that the E-1 is specifically
7 matches
Mail list logo
