I have the 4.5/15 mm Voigtländer and it is very good indeed. It vignettes noticeably but not annoyingly. A Voigtländer Bessa-L and the 15 mm is not that expensive, either. And no weird colours - just good saturation on mine. All the best! Raimo Personal photography homepage at http://www.uusikaupunki.fi/~raikorho
-----Alkuperäinen viesti----- Lähettäjä: Mishka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Vastaanottaja: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Päivä: 08. helmikuuta 2003 5:54 Aihe: ultrawide lens questions >for some time now i have been looking for an ultrawide lens (18mm and >wider). i seem to somewhat narrowed my list of choices: > >pentax 15mm/3.5 >voigtlander 15mm or 12mm >pentax fisheye 17mm/4 >pentax fisheye 16mm/2.8 > >does anyone here have experience with these? the review on luminous >landscape gives voigtlander 12mm quite a bit of praise, but i am curious, >how they compare to pentax 15mm (the designs are obviously very different). >pls, no usual "go try them both and see for yourself" :) > >also, i have been enjoying zenitar 16mm full frame fisheye for quite some >time now, and with a little help of photoshop, it too is capable to give >some pretty wide images with very little distortion. has anyone here tried >to compare quality-wise remapped fisheye images with true wide-angle shots >at, say, 15mm? -- all my film ends up scanned anyway. > >and, finally, did anyone tried both, zenitar and pentax fisheyes side by >side? does pentax worth the premium? and, quality-wise, which pentax one is >better, 17mm or 16mm? > >ufff... now back to scanning. > >best, >mishka >
