Re: We still need more photos for the 2010 PDML Photo Annual - two days left

2010-03-05 Thread mike wilson
Scott Loveless sdlovel...@gmail.com wrote: On 3/4/10, William Robb war...@gmail.com wrote: - Original Message - From: frank theriault Subject: Re: We still need more photos for the 2010 PDML Photo Annual - two days left Hopefully Mark won't mind me divulging

Re: We still need more photos for the 2010 PDML Photo Annual - two days left

2010-03-05 Thread William Robb
- Original Message - From: Scott Loveless Subject: Re: We still need more photos for the 2010 PDML Photo Annual - two days left It's all good. We had already decided to leave your picture out of the book anyway. ;-) To be totally honest, we're keeping your photo, but we're

Re: We still need more photos for the 2010 PDML Photo Annual - two days left

2010-03-04 Thread frank theriault
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 11:20 AM, Jack Davis jdavi...@yahoo.com wrote: I noticed Frank is getting pushy by submitting four shots. Wouldn't you know it? I was wondering it someone would notice. Well, what happened is I submitted my three, then wondered to Mark if perhaps I could replace one

Re: We still need more photos for the 2010 PDML Photo Annual - two days left

2010-03-04 Thread William Robb
- Original Message - From: frank theriault Subject: Re: We still need more photos for the 2010 PDML Photo Annual - two days left Hopefully Mark won't mind me divulging bits of our private conversation; I just don't want anyone to think that I was flouting the rules or that I

Re: We still need more photos for the 2010 PDML Photo Annual - two days left

2010-03-04 Thread Scott Loveless
On 3/4/10, William Robb war...@gmail.com wrote: - Original Message - From: frank theriault Subject: Re: We still need more photos for the 2010 PDML Photo Annual - two days left Hopefully Mark won't mind me divulging bits of our private conversation; I just don't want anyone

We still need more photos for the 2010 PDML Photo Annual - two days left

2010-02-26 Thread Mark Roberts
Come on, you know you've got at least one shot that needs to be seen... http://www.robertstech.com/pdmlbook/pdmlbook.php The window for submissions closes on Sunday at midnight. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from

Re: We still need more photos for the 2010 PDML Photo Annual - two days left

2010-02-26 Thread Tim Øsleby
I will :-) Got at one shot ready to go. -- MaritimTim http://maritimtim.blogspot.com/ 2010/2/26 Mark Roberts m...@robertstech.com: Come on, you know you've got at least one shot that needs to be seen... http://www.robertstech.com/pdmlbook/pdmlbook.php The window for submissions closes

Re: We still need more photos for the 2010 PDML Photo Annual - two days left

2010-02-26 Thread Steve Sharpe
At 10:46 AM -0500 2/26/10, Mark Roberts wrote: Come on, you know you've got at least one shot that needs to be seen... http://www.robertstech.com/pdmlbook/pdmlbook.php The window for submissions closes on Sunday at midnight. Still three shots - e - photo submissions per person? --

Re: We still need more photos for the 2010 PDML Photo Annual - two days left

2010-02-26 Thread Jack Davis
I noticed Frank is getting pushy by submitting four shots. Wouldn't you know it? ;-)) Jack --- On Fri, 2/26/10, Steve Sharpe d...@eastlink.ca wrote: From: Steve Sharpe d...@eastlink.ca Subject: Re: We still need more photos for the 2010 PDML Photo Annual - two days left To: Pentax

Re: We still need more photos for the 2010 PDML Photo Annual - two days left

2010-02-26 Thread Steve Sharpe
At 8:20 AM -0800 2/26/10, Jack Davis wrote: I noticed Frank is getting pushy by submitting four shots. Wouldn't you know it? ;-)) Jack Yes...some people on this list are such anarchists! -- Steve Sharpe d...@eastlink.ca • http://earth.delith.com/photo_gallery.html -- PDML

Re: We still need more photos for the 2010 PDML Photo Annual - two days left

2010-02-26 Thread Miserere
On 26 February 2010 11:20, Jack Davis jdavi...@yahoo.com wrote: I noticed Frank is getting pushy by submitting four shots. Wouldn't you know it? ;-)) Jack Don't hate on Frank, if you add together all the in-focus pixels on his 4 submissions, it's probably a lower number than for any other

Re: We still need more photos for the 2010 PDML Photo Annual - two days left

2010-02-26 Thread David J Brooks
Sharpe d...@eastlink.ca Subject: Re: We still need more photos for the 2010 PDML Photo Annual - two days  left To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net Date: Friday, February 26, 2010, 8:05 AM At 10:46 AM -0500 2/26/10, Mark Roberts wrote: Come on, you know you've got at least one shot

Re: We still need more photos for the 2010 PDML Photo Annual - two days left

2010-02-26 Thread Jack Davis
You're right. I should apologize..some day. OTOH, someone told me my pictures are sorry. Maybe that takes care of it.(?) Jack --- On Fri, 2/26/10, Miserere miser...@gmail.com wrote: From: Miserere miser...@gmail.com Subject: Re: We still need more photos for the 2010 PDML Photo Annual - two

Re: We still need more photos for the 2010 PDML Photo Annual - two days left

2010-02-26 Thread Jack Davis
That knowledge may upset Mark. O.. Jack --- On Fri, 2/26/10, Steve Sharpe d...@eastlink.ca wrote: From: Steve Sharpe d...@eastlink.ca Subject: Re: We still need more photos for the 2010 PDML Photo Annual - two days left To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net Date: Friday, February

Re: We still need more photos for the 2010 PDML Photo Annual - two days left

2010-02-26 Thread David Savage
On 26 February 2010 23:46, Mark Roberts m...@robertstech.com wrote: Come on, you know you've got at least one shot that needs to be seen... *sigh* This is the only downside of switching to Nikon. :-D -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net

Re: We still need more photos for the 2010 PDML Photo Annual - two days left

2010-02-26 Thread David J Brooks
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 4:21 PM, David Savage ozsav...@gmail.com wrote: On 26 February 2010 23:46, Mark Roberts m...@robertstech.com wrote: Come on, you know you've got at least one shot that needs to be seen... *sigh* This is the only downside of switching to Nikon. Shhh. What they don;t