Balance in between ...
On 12/18/2023 12:09 PM, coll...@brendemuehl.net wrote:
Which would you prefer in a lens?\
\
1\. Best rendering. Detail may not be as fine, but the formation of the image
is closer to reality.
2\. Some pincushion distortion, but better detail.
3\. Balance in between
1. Brutal Sharpness. A little fall off towards the edges OK.
2. Vivid Color reproduction - more towards earthy Browns
and true Reds. Little or no Bluish cast.
3. Controlled Distortion in both the X and Y planes
4. Good rendering both in the Shadows and Highlights.
5. Low Flare.
6. Hard
> On Dec 18, 2023, at 9:09 AM, coll...@brendemuehl.net wrote:
>
> Which would you prefer in a lens?\
> \
> 1\. Best rendering. Detail may not be as fine, but the formation of the image
> is closer to reality.
Are you talking about the FA77 limited? That's pretty muc
On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 05:09:54PM +, coll...@brendemuehl.net wrote:
> Which would you prefer in a lens?\
> \
> 1\. Best rendering. Detail may not be as fine, but the formation of the image
> is closer to reality.
>
> 2\. Some pincushion distortion, but better detail.
For most of my work center sharpness and detail.
Henk
Op 2023-12-18 om 18:09 schreef coll...@brendemuehl.net:
Which would you prefer in a lens?\
\
1\. Best rendering. Detail may not be as fine, but the formation of the image
is closer to reality.
2\. Some pincushion distortion, but better
5 matches
Mail list logo