Guys: what speed of film are you using. It really should not be an issue if
you're using a slow speed, high saturation film. 100asa or less...
In a message dated 4/28/02 11:49:01 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<>
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http:/
If you can shoot at f22, either increase your shutter speed or decrease your
film speed. I don't believe I have ever had to shoot at f22...
In a message dated 4/28/02 10:38:41 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
< wrote:
Why would you want to use 1/22 in the first place? I am just curious.>>
-
This m
Sunday, April 28, 2002, 8:21:23 PM, William wrote:
WR> - Original Message -
WR> From: Mishka
WR> Subject: Re: Why some need f/22 (was: Re: Thanks Ultra-Wide
WR> Anglers! (Now a few more questions...)
>> now that i think about it, i remeber i needed that a few
WR> times.
>> once was last
Sunday, April 28, 2002, 6:19:33 PM, Mishka wrote:
M> Thanks Paul,
M> That didn't occur to me. Seriously.
M> I thought more along the DOF line, and 20mm should have everything in focus
M> way before f/22.
With the F/Calc, I computed, using a circle of confusion for APS film
size (because the COC f
I might get the name wrong. What i meant is the effect you get when you set
a really long exposure (1s+) and get the water washed out (kinda like a
veil) rather than stopped in action. I rarely have film slower than 100 and
often even that is too fast if I want to have a reasonable (>1/8) aperture
I have this filter now. Didn't have then. But I agree that this is a much
better option than stopping down that much.
And as for the slower film -- it was a cloudy day and the only roll I had
was the one (400) in my camera.
> > now that i think about it, i remeber i needed that a few times.
> > o
- Original Message -
From: Mishka
Subject: Re: Why some need f/22 (was: Re: Thanks Ultra-Wide
Anglers! (Now a few more questions...)
> now that i think about it, i remeber i needed that a few
times.
> once was last year when i was trying to shoot a waterfall and
wanted to g
if the dof is not important, one can also use a filter to slow down the
shutter further if one doesn not have issues about using a filter :)
On Sun, Apr 28, 2002 at 09:54:29AM -0400, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
> What's that? Could you not use a slower film?
>
> Mishka wrote:
>
> > a "b
8 matches
Mail list logo
