Joseph Tainter a écrit:
For this class of lens it is quite sharp plus a lot of fun. I have
enjoyed mine much. It is sharper than Pentax's F 17-28 fisheys.
A mine friend has a Zenitar (for Nikon), and I have a K 4/17mm fish eye.
Both seems near similar quality.
Michel
For this class of lens it is quite sharp plus a lot of fun. I have
enjoyed mine much. It is sharper than Pentax's F 17-28 fisheys.
JOe
not corrected
wrt this... Every full frame fish eye of the same FL will show
more or less the same distorsion.
Hope this helps.
Ciao,
Gianfranco
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've been think about getting a Zenitar fish eye (16mm).
Screwmount, it would
work on my Canon
Hope this helps.
Ciao,
Gianfranco
Yup. Sure does.
Thx!, Marnie aka Doe :-)
- Original Message -
From:
Subject: OT: Zenitar Fish Eye?
I've been think about getting a Zenitar fish eye (16mm). Screwmount, it
would
work on my Canon Elan 7e (with the adapter that I already got for the
Super
Tak 35mm 3.5). Evidentially higher priced/better fish eyes have a lot
Hi Marnie,
On Wed, 5 Nov 2003 01:12:49 EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been think about getting a Zenitar fish eye (16mm). [...]
Complete waste of time or not?
I have one and I've been very happy with the prints I get from it. It
does have a lot of distortion, but it's a fisheye so I
I'm only using the central portion of the image.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 1:12 AM
Subject: OT: Zenitar Fish Eye?
I've been think about getting a Zenitar fish eye (16mm). Screwmount, it
would
work on my
:
To:
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 1:12 AM
Subject: OT: Zenitar Fish Eye?
I've been think about getting a Zenitar fish eye (16mm). Screwmount, it
would
work on my Canon Elan 7e (with the adapter that I already got for the
Super
Tak 35mm 3.5). Evidentially higher priced/better
I've been think about getting a Zenitar fish eye (16mm).
Complete waste of time or not?
Hi,
I have owned the Zenitar (K-mount) and it's a good lens for the money,
if you are able to get it for a good price, of course, and get one
that has a good build quality.
However, the lens is a very
On Wed, 5 Nov 2003, William Robb wrote:
I had one for a while. I found it to be quite sharp, and surprisingly,
not overly flarey. I thought the colour rendition was a bit garish, it
might fit in well with Canon lenses in this regard. I found a good deal
on a Super Takumar 17mm fisheye, and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been think about getting a Zenitar fish eye (16mm). Screwmount, it would
work on my Canon Elan 7e (with the adapter that I already got for the Super
Tak 35mm 3.5). Evidentially higher priced/better fish eyes have a lot less
distortion, etc., etc.
But it might
On 5 Nov 2003 at 13:04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey, Katrin, I remember those banana trees! Kewl shot.
thanks ^_^
I know that I posted them some time ago, but since you asked about
the zenitar...
I didn't have much time recently, but I hope I find the time to give
the zenitar a bit
12 matches
Mail list logo
