Re: anti-M arguments

2004-03-03 Thread Mark Cassino
At 11:35 PM 3/2/2004 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: First, a great many M lenses were identical optically to either the preceding K lens, or to the following A lens, so I don't think that in those (many) cases anybody can credibly claim that the Ks or As were better. They CAN'T be

Re: anti-M arguments

2004-03-03 Thread Andre Langevin
This M thread keeps jumping from a subject to another! As this one is still hot, may I clarify one point: First, a great many M lenses were identical optically to either the preceding K lens, or to the following A lens, so I don't think that in those (many) cases anybody can credibly claim

Re: anti-M arguments

2004-03-03 Thread Alan Chan
Without surprise consider the focusing mechanisms of most FA lenses (including some * lenses) were designed and manufactured to be loose so they could AF faster. If the glasses can move up down, they can't be perfectly calibrated, or can they??? Regards, Alan Chan http://www.pbase.com/wlachan