Re: cities vs. no cities

2001-02-19 Thread W Keith Mosier
Chris, I would rather leave my name/city out of a list posted to the web. I'd rather avoid the spammers. I don't mind being included in a mailing list. Sorry, about the extra work, but you know how it is when you volunteer. g Chris Brogden wrote: However, I'm wondering how everyone would

RE: cities vs. no cities

2001-02-19 Thread Lewis, Gerald
I usually sign my posts as: Jerry in Houston -Original Message- From: W Keith Mosier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 19, 2001 6:41 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: cities vs. no cities Chris, I would rather leave my name/city out of a list posted to the web

Re: E-mails or no e-mails; Was: Re: cities vs. no cities

2001-02-15 Thread Kristian-H. Schüssler
- Original Message - From: "Chris Brogden" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 3:43 AM Subject: E-mails or no e-mails; Was: Re: cities vs. no cities Hello Chris My vote: In order to make it easy to communicate with someone in a

Re: cities vs. no cities

2001-02-14 Thread Tom Rittenhouse
Chris, If you plan to post it on the web please leave mine out. I get enough juck mail as it is. I would imagine a list containing e-mail addresses would be a spammers wet dream come true. You might talk to Doug Brewer about Majordomo, it is very good at sending things out to a mailing list.

Re: cities vs. no cities

2001-02-14 Thread Dave Evans
I thought it was a private listing, with name and location. If it's a website with email listings, leave me out. Too much drivel could come from this. Every peddler in the world selling anything vaguely related to photography would have easy hunting. A captive audience. [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: cities vs. no cities

2001-02-14 Thread Tom Rittenhouse
Thank you Doug for doing that! --Tom Doug Brewer wrote: Rob, You'll note that the headers have had individual addresses removed from them in the archives. To get the email addresses off the archive site, you'd have to read each individual message, then click on the private response

Re: cities vs. no cities

2001-02-14 Thread John Francis
Tom Rittenhouse wrote: I get enough juck mail as it is. I would imagine a list containing e-mail addresses would be a spammers wet dream come true. In that case you shouldn't have posted to the PDML - the postings are archived. And, guess what - your email address is shown in the 'from'

RE: cities vs. no cities

2001-02-14 Thread Matamoros, Cesar A.
Rittenhouse [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2001 12:22 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: cities vs. no cities Ah, but, some of the people that would be on the location list are lurkers and so wouldn't get spam from the archives. And many spammers are rather dumb

Re: cities vs. no cities

2001-02-14 Thread William Robb
Since I started the HTML thing as a trial balloon, I will now attempt to add a wee bit of common sense (something remarkably lacking in this thread). All Chris has to do is post a name and a location to a web page. Yer email address has no reason to be there, and if I were doing this project, I

E-mails or no e-mails; Was: Re: cities vs. no cities

2001-02-14 Thread Chris Brogden
On Wed, 14 Feb 2001, William Robb wrote: Since I started the HTML thing as a trial balloon, I will now attempt to add a wee bit of common sense (something remarkably lacking in this thread). All Chris has to do is post a name and a location to a web page. Yer email address has no reason to

Re: E-mails or no e-mails; Was: Re: cities vs. no cities

2001-02-14 Thread Chris Brogden
On Wed, 14 Feb 2001, Chris Brogden wrote: As long as the web address isn't published, but kept confidential in private replies, Something else I just thought of, Bill. For me, it's no more work to mail out the complete list to everyone than it is to mail out the URL. Same amount of time

Re: E-mails or no e-mails; Was: Re: cities vs. no cities

2001-02-14 Thread JeffW.
on 2/14/01 8:43 PM, Chris Brogden at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I considered posting the info without e-mail addresses, but thought that part of the point was to make it easy to communicate with someone in a particular location. If I don't include the e-mail addresses, then people will have

Re: E-mails or no e-mails; Was: Re: cities vs. no cities

2001-02-14 Thread John Glover
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2001 8:43 PM Subject: E-mails or no e-mails; Was: Re: cities vs. no cities Do people care about this? What are your feeling regarding e-mail addresses or no e-mail addresses? The way I see it, if the majority of people don't see a need to incl

Re: cities vs. no cities

2001-02-13 Thread Chris Brogden
On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, William Robb wrote: Hi Chris. Here is how I would do it. Make a web page of the respondents information and put it on my private site, unlinked to my index page. I would then put the URL into a sig file and reply to respondents , add the sig file and send it off.

Re: cities vs. no cities

2001-02-13 Thread Dan Scott
I know it would be easier. It's going to be quite the task to e-mail out a copy to everyone, and I would rather put it on a web page. However, I'm wondering how everyone would feel about having their cities posted on a web page. Personally, I don't care either way, myself, but I just assumed