My K1 has been sitting pretty much idle since February, but my use of it
since I got it has almost always been on a tripod using live view. The
exception has been when I'm doing the now very rare portrait session. I
prefer a bit more mobility than tripods give.
I bought quite heavily into the
Good point, Bill. This makes sense. I use live view almost exclusively when
shooting cars for editorial, but almost never when shooting birds or other
things for my own entertainment. I may never graduate to mirrorless, since I’ve
pretty much decided that I will keep using my current kit until
On 8/22/2023 11:39 AM, coll...@brendemuehl.net wrote:
OF course. DSLR is, for the most part, better than mirrorless for focus
accuracy.
This actually isn't true. The (IMHO only) advantage of mirrorless is
focusing directly on the sensor rather than via a secondary method
(either focusing
OF course. DSLR is, for the most part, better than mirrorless for focus
accuracy.
I did this handheld and before leaving for work this a.m. No time for a tripod.
Also, the Sony is more pixels but the Pentax still looks generally better.
Now if I put the 77 on the Sony … it would best any of
It is obvious that there is a difference in DOF, f2.2 versus f4. In the K-1
picture the focus is not on the eyes.
Henk
Op di 22 aug 2023 om 15:27 schreef :
> https://www.flickr.com/photos/101533246@N02/albums/72177720310649025
>
> Yes, they’re both older hardware. But comparisons o
https://www.flickr.com/photos/101533246@N02/albums/72177720310649025
Yes, they’re both older hardware. But comparisons of top-end equipment are
still useful.
The Sony A7RII was equipped with the G24-105/4. The K-1 with the 77/1.8
Limited. Two outstanding lenses.
Both of these pairs are crops
6 matches
Mail list logo
