2009/8/18 Doug Franklin :
> A layered defense is essential.
Absolutely.
When having two or more machines available, that's easy to set up. And
it's funny you should write it like that, because that's one more
thing I did recently; to set up access to the old machine through RDP
rather than using a
AlunFoto wrote:
The real question is whether UAC is good enough to deserve the faith
you place in it.
The irony is that I place no particular faith in it, but I leave it
enabled to make me think before clicking "OK". :-)
Microsoft has attempted to build
security for people who know nothing
2009/8/18 Joseph McAllister :
> Who, in many instances, has no idea why they are clicking 'OK', thereby
> negating that security feature.
Exactly. Most kids I know will do that, including my own. And their
English is pretty good. Mind you, most of the "dangerous" conscent
requests are given from e
2009/8/18 Doug Franklin :
> Duh, I missed the part about elevating to Administrator ... that's a
> /really/ bad idea.
Doug,
Sorry, but blanket statements makes my neck hairs stand on end. It's
like elevating the sunny-16 rule into saying that "if the sun shines,
it's a really bad idea to use any
2009/8/18 Doug Franklin :
> From a security perspective, that's a bad idea. UAC may be annoying, but
> it's there to help save you from Windows' "ease of use" features when
> exploited by the bad guys.
The real question is whether UAC is good enough to deserve the faith
you place in it.
When usi
On Aug 17, 2009, at 16:25 , Doug Franklin wrote:
Adam Maas wrote:
If you want something approaching actual security, turn UAC off and
don't work from a Adminstrator account.
Duh, I missed the part about elevating to Administrator ... that's
a /really/ bad idea. I understand what you're s
Adam Maas wrote:
If you want something approaching actual security, turn UAC off and
don't work from a Adminstrator account.
Duh, I missed the part about elevating to Administrator ... that's a
/really/ bad idea. I understand what you're saying about UAC and
training, but UAC does help if y
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 6:57 PM, Doug Franklin wrote:
> AlunFoto wrote:
>
>> And I've turned off the User Control and elevated my regular account
>> to Administrator level.
>
> From a security perspective, that's a bad idea. UAC may be annoying, but
> it's there to help save you from Windows' "eas
AlunFoto wrote:
And I've turned off the User Control and elevated my regular account
to Administrator level.
From a security perspective, that's a bad idea. UAC may be annoying,
but it's there to help save you from Windows' "ease of use" features
when exploited by the bad guys.
--
Thanks,
Bob, the easiest way to make vista faster is downgrading to xp... ;-)
lf
Bob Sullivan escreveu:
Jostein,
What features do you turn off in Vista?
I have relented and bought a new desktop with Vista.
(Lightroom 2.4 and the K7 have done in the 6 year old computer)
The new Dell seems to run fast, b
Bob,
I've turned off the Windows Update (gasp!). That is, I've set it to
just look for updates and notify without downloading. This is
something I began doing with XP, btw, because I found the updating
service to take annoyingly much resources. The CPU process running the
update didn't show up in
Bob,
I am not in front of my Windows 7 system but do a search on performance
settings. That should bring up a page with some check boxes. Then
check for faster performance. That will turn off a lot of the glitz
(Aero etc) and make the system run better ( I think)
John Graves
WA1JG
Bob S
Jostein,
What features do you turn off in Vista?
I have relented and bought a new desktop with Vista.
(Lightroom 2.4 and the K7 have done in the 6 year old computer)
The new Dell seems to run fast, but Vista is a pain.
Regards, Bob S.
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 1:49 AM, AlunFoto wrote:
> 2009/8/17 C
2009/8/17 Christine Aguila :
> I know you guys are jealous since I'm working on unclogging and cleaning
> print heads and nozzles this hot and humid sunday night. Ugh! what a pain.
Hey Christine,
I do feel sorry for you. Hope you get the printer right.
And that the heat and humidity meet some r
On Aug 17, 2009, at 1:51 PM, Christine Aguila wrote:
I know you guys are jealous since I'm working on unclogging and
cleaning print heads and nozzles this hot and humid sunday night.
Ugh! what a pain.
Not really... I think my printer's going to need unclogging again.
It's been ages sin
2009/8/17 Christine Aguila :
> I know you guys are jealous since I'm working on unclogging and cleaning
> print heads and nozzles this hot and humid sunday night. Ugh! what a pain.
My task for yesterday was to install new video cards in my desktop
computer (yes, two of them), and upgrade all th
- Original Message -
From: "Christine Aguila"
Subject: oh, my gosh . . .
I know you guys are jealous since I'm working on unclogging and cleaning
print heads and nozzles this hot and humid sunday night. Ugh! what a
pain.
Easy job. I was making neat stacks out of
ng even more. and I just restarted again .
. . on and on and on . . .
- Original Message -
From: "P. J. Alling"
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Sent: Sunday, August 16, 2009 8:57 PM
Subject: Re: oh, my gosh . . .
Are you using a tiny plunger?
Christine Aguila wrote:
Are you using a tiny plunger?
Christine Aguila wrote:
I know you guys are jealous since I'm working on unclogging and
cleaning print heads and nozzles this hot and humid sunday night.
Ugh! what a pain.
--
The free man owns himself. He can damage himself with either eating or
drinking;
I know you guys are jealous since I'm working on unclogging and cleaning
print heads and nozzles this hot and humid sunday night. Ugh! what a pain.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the li
20 matches
Mail list logo
