Tot you'uns use dem rods 'n chains?
Lik in dat
sado/maso/bondo thang?
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
---
I gots me a conversion piece of paper on the wall. Now's i cen tell how many
On 11/30/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I gots me a conversion piece of paper on the wall. Now's i cen tell how many
rods in a
perch.:-)
European or African?
-Arthur, King of the Britons
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
Rule: Never convert from one system to another. Use whichever is
appropriate. That way you always know tha 10 meters is 10 meters, that
30 feet is 30 feet, and that 20 cubits is 20 cubits. Figuring it any
other way make you crazy. Look at watchmakers' who think their American
conceived 5/16
Wasn't it:
3 feet ~= 1 meter ??
(school was some times ago)
Danilo
danilo wrote:
Wasn't it:
3 feet ~= 1 meter ??
(school was some times ago)
Danilo
Roughly speaking...
Certainly good enough for gaining perspective on magnitude.
keith whaley
That's ~8% too small -- quite a bit. I
metre = ~39.3701 inches.
D
danilo wrote:
Wasn't it:
3 feet ~= 1 meter ??
(school was some times ago)
Danilo
--
Dr E D F Williams
___
http://personal.inet.fi/cool/don.williams
See feature: The Cement Company from Hell
More like 3 Feet 3.6 inches ~ 1 meter...
More than enough to very annoying over 100 yards, (or meters if you prefer).
danilo wrote:
Wasn't it:
3 feet ~= 1 meter ??
(school was some times ago)
Danilo
--
When you're worried or in doubt,
Run in circles, (scream and shout).
P. J. Alling wrote:
More like 3 Feet 3.6 inches ~ 1 meter...
More than enough to very annoying over 100 yards, (or meters if you
prefer).
danilo wrote:
Wasn't it:
3 feet ~= 1 meter ??
(school was some times ago)
Danilo
For order of magnitude conversions, it's just fine.
If
Very dirty, 7 meters is 23+ feet, that 3 1/2 inch difference per. foot
adds up very quickly. If you're depending on 30 feet of rope to span
10 meters of distance you're seriously out of luck.
keith_w wrote:
P. J. Alling wrote:
More like 3 Feet 3.6 inches ~ 1 meter...
More than enough
P. J. Alling wrote:
Very dirty, 7 meters is 23+ feet, that 3 1/2 inch difference per. foot
adds up very quickly. If you're depending on 30 feet of rope to span
10 meters of distance you're seriously out of luck.
First of all, I get 22 feet, 11 1/2.
I used 1 meter as being 39.37 in length.
Just add 1 additional foot for every 4 meters - you'll make it OK.
-P
P. J. Alling wrote:
Very dirty, 7 meters is 23+ feet, that 3 1/2 inch difference per. foot
adds up very quickly. If you're depending on 30 feet of rope to span
10 meters of distance you're seriously out of luck.
Tot you'uns use dem rods 'n chains? Lik in dat sado/maso/bondo thang?
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
---
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dave Brooks wrote:
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2005
Um??? Ain'at 30 lowley cm's?
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
---
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dave Brooks wrote:
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2005 22:40:01 +
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2005 22:40:01 +
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax list pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Thank you for subscribing with Affinity Callback
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
On 28/11/05, Doug
Dave Brooks wrote:
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2005 22:40:01 +
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax list pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Thank you for subscribing with Affinity Callback
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Dave Brooks wrote:
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2005 22:40:01 +
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax list pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Thank you for subscribing with Affinity Callback
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type:
16 matches
Mail list logo
