For those interested in a non-photography-world reviewer's
impressions ...
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/23/technology/personaltech/23pogue.html?_r=28dpcoref=sloginoref=slogin
or
http://tinyurl.com/6rcj49
enjoy
G
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Oct 23, 2008, at 12:19, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
For those interested in a non-photography-world reviewer's
impressions ...
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/23/technology/personaltech/23pogue.html?_r=28dpcoref=sloginoref=slogin
or
http://tinyurl.com/6rcj49
I was hoping it would be
I just saw this and was going to send a post about it. This reviewer
seems like a reasonable sort but isn't a photo-weenie like those of use
here (and I saw that with great fondest for y'all.) His most serious
reason for not buying the camera is that next year's model will have
video
On Oct 23, 2008, at 13:43, Steve Desjardins wrote:
His most serious
reason for not buying the camera is that next year's model will have
video capabilities.
..and that it's heavier and not really any smaller than the smallest
DSLR (Olympus 420). Or did I read that incorrectly?
He does say As a result, the new G! occupies 29 cubic inches , in
contrast to the 64 cubic inches for the Nikon (D90); it weighs 8 oz vs.
22. He also says it's bigger and heavier than the Olympus 420. The
420 weighs 13.4 oz (so I suspect he meant to write 18 oz. for the G1)
and is 38.6 cubic
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 2:51 PM, Charles Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 23, 2008, at 13:43, Steve Desjardins wrote:
His most serious
reason for not buying the camera is that next year's model will have
video capabilities.
..and that it's heavier and not really any smaller than
6 matches
Mail list logo
