I found this on the panotools list:
http://michel.thoby.free.fr/Tokina_10_17/NPP-Tokina.jpg
On 8/8/07, jon carver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi All,
> I've been using a couple DA lenses in panoramic shots
> and was hoping to compare the results of my experiment
> to determine the location of the
The poster also posted this:
Please take note that for six shots and 17 mm, the NPP is some
millimeters backwards from the shown position.
To put it simply: the NPP is about fixed from 10 mm (four shots
around) to 17 mm (six shots around).
On 8/9/07, Toine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I found this
On Mar 12, 2007, at 5:35 PM, Juan Buhler wrote:
> On 3/12/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Makes a great 24x24 mm Pentax Superwide on a 35mm body ...
>>
>> http://homepage.mac.com/godders/DA14FF-sq.jpg
>>
>
> Which brings to mind... There's really no specific reason for DSLRs
>
On 3/12/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Makes a great 24x24 mm Pentax Superwide on a 35mm body ...
>
> http://homepage.mac.com/godders/DA14FF-sq.jpg
>
Which brings to mind... There's really no specific reason for DSLRs
sensors to be rectangular, except for the size of mirror and
Makes a great 24x24 mm Pentax Superwide on a 35mm body ...
http://homepage.mac.com/godders/DA14FF-sq.jpg
G
On Mar 12, 2007, at 1:41 PM, Joseph Tainter wrote:
> Richard Day has posted a scan of an image taken with the DA 14 on
> film:
>
> http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1036&
Richard Day has posted a scan of an image taken with the DA 14 on film:
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1036&message=22421936
It clearly won't work with any sensor much larger than what we have. In
my mind, this greatly diminishes the possibility that Pentax will ever
bring out
Cameron Hood wrote:
> http://www.pentax.co.jp/japan/news/2006/press-image/200646-05.jpg
Now if they'll just come out with quality 1.4X and 2X teleconverters
similar to the A-XS ones, that are compatible with at least the
supersonic AF, but also (hopefully) the older "blade" AF ...
--
Thanks,
Dou
> Looks like it's fine past 24mm. I've just checked it through the view
> finder though.
>
> Thibouille wrote:
> > What about DA18-55 ?
Thanks for checking ;)
--
Thibouille
--
*ist-D,Z1,SFXn,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ...
Looks like it's fine past 24mm. I've just checked it through the view
finder though.
Thibouille wrote:
What about DA18-55 ?
--
Thibouille
--
*ist-D,Z1,SFXn,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ...
.
What about DA18-55 ?
--
Thibouille
--
*ist-D,Z1,SFXn,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ...
DA 40 - I have heard yes.
I bought a DA 40mm to use on 35mm -- works fine, it's a great lens.
*> UncaMikey
- Original Message -
From: "Pawel Czarnul"
Subject: DA lenses on FF
Hello All,
I would like to know which DA lenses can be used on FF (i.e. film) and
what focal lengths.
I refer to covering the entire frame. In particular:
1. DA 16-45
2. DA 10-17 FE
3. DA 12-24
4. DA 50-200
5. DA
On Feb 24, 2006, at 2:26 PM, Paweł Czarnul wrote:
1. DA 16-45
Covers 24x36 from about 22-24mm up.
5. DA 14 ??? - I assume no here.
Covers 24x24.
6. DA 40 - I have heard yes.
Many have said yes.
Godfrey
Alright, thanks for the information.
BTW I take the opportunity to thank you for your site and the work you
do. It gives a very interesting source of information on lenses.
Thanks!
2005/4/20, Stan Halpin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I am accumulating the comments as they occur. The DA lenses (and the
>
I am accumulating the comments as they occur. The DA lenses (and the
several other "missing" newer lenses) will be incorporated next time
around.
Stan
On Apr 20, 2005, at 1:10 AM, Thibouille wrote:
None of the DA lenses are on Stan's site. Is that deliberate or are
they just too recent to have a
Hi, Clover
I agree with you. It's not a nice colour, but I think it's traditional. The
A* lenses had a rubber ring of the same colour to mark it's "asterisk-ness".
At least my 645 A* 300/4 has one.
Cheers,
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sen
> From: edwin
>
> I think the answer is that the DA lenses are smaller than they would be if
> they were not DA. Does anybody make a 16-45 that covers 35mm format?
> Sigma's 15-35 is not exactly small.
by the same reasoning lenses in 35mm format and, say, 6x6, covering the same angle,
should be
17 matches
Mail list logo