Hi, thanks to all who share their MZ-S impressions.
How do you rate the noise of the motor drive? Is it
particularly quite or is it more on the noisy side?
Alexander
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
Sure, Den. No problem.
Doug
At 8:16 AM +03003/7/01, Dennis Klimovich caused thus to appear:
Dear Doug.
Is it possible to add your message to our collection of
'MZ-S impressions"?
I mean two messages from PDMLers (Cesar and Ed) now in our
"News" list
Doug, I gather that you felt that the camera had a quality feel to it
unlike my brother,the photo store dealer, who said that it felt
cheap. Also did you find anything out about flash exposure compensation?
DG
At 11:40 PM 3/6/01 -0500, you wrote:
Spent a couple of hours examining the MZ-S
MZ-S first look
Doug, I gather that you felt that the camera had a quality feel to it
unlike my brother,the photo store dealer, who said that it felt
cheap. Also did you find anything out about flash exposure
compensation?
DG
At 11:40 PM 3/6/01 -0500, you wrote:
Spent a couple of hours
Alin,
While I was writing that, I kept having the feeling I had seen the foam
around the film window on other cameras, but could not dredge up a specific
memory, which is why I mentioned it could be common. Glad you cleared that
up for me. It's tough getting old.
Actually, I did point the
If "quality" in a 35mm body is defined by a camera that
approaches the size and weight of a medium format
camera, the MZ-S would feel cheap indeed. If, however,
you equate quality in 35mm with a small, well-built
package that seems durable, the MZ-S wins hands down.
I think I should also
Doug, thanks for the details. One of the limitations of Safox IV is
the inability to handle predictably multiple subjects. While the last
software versions (MZ-7, MZ-3) appear to have been improved in this
regard, one still cannot be sure what subject the wide area AF picks
up.
It does seem
Rob Brigham writes:
For me, the only heavy item I want is my tripod!
There's no such thing as a heavy 35mm camera :) I used to think my K2
was heavy until I got the RB67.
Cheers,
- Dave
David A. Mann, B.E.
email [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://www.digistar.com/~dmann/
"Why is it that if an
Spent a couple of hours examining the MZ-S this afternoon, and thought I'd share a few
impressions with you. First, here's Ed Sullivan: "Tonight we have a rilly big shoe."
Thank you, thank you. Now, on to the camera. Some points in no particular order.
1.) It's =small=. Sure, I read the specs,
Dear Doug.
Is it possible to add your message to our collection of
'MZ-S impressions"?
I mean two messages from PDMLers (Cesar and Ed) now in our
"News" list
http://www.mtu-net.ru/penta/news/news_2001.shtml.
This reviews are visited very well - because many people
want to know more about this
Sorry, usual here mistake - not change address of message.
It should be private...
My apologies to Doug and ALL.
Den
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at
11 matches
Mail list logo
