On 2/2/2012 1:45 AM, Brian Walters wrote:
Quoting Walt Gilbert ldott...@gmail.com:
On 2/2/2012 1:00 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
On 2/1/2012 10:44 PM, Walt Gilbert wrote:
Here's a re-crop. I tried to replicate the original look as much as I
could using what tools I have at my disposal (GIMP and
Thanks Darren - and I thought of offering you my *ist-D, but there are a couple
of things
it won't do any more - none critical, of course.
John Coyle
Brisbane, Australia
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Darren
Addy
Sent:
On 1/2/12, Larry Colen, discombobulated, unleashed:
Or, if you're a cheap bastard (I'm looking at you Cotty):
http://lifehacker.com/5780891/make-a-diy-dslr-video-viewfinder-on-the-cheap
Well, I'd save even more money by not using hair ties.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) |
On 1/2/12, Walt Gilbert, discombobulated, unleashed:
I would happily carry it right out in
the open for all to see.
Mark.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
-- http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
This could bring me back to the Pentax fold...
On 02/02/2012, Jaume Lahuerta jlah...@yahoo.com wrote:
...and it is indeed ugly (IMHO):
http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-k-01-forum/173674-k-01-leaked-photos.html
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
It solves my problem. I was looking for an APS-C carry around with a decent
lens.
I like the look gf the Sony NEX-7 but the standard zoom isn't brilliant and the
Zeiss 24mm lens would be pricey. The Fujis looked OK but there are some
concerns about the user interface for the X100.
Putting a
Bob W wrote:
...and it is indeed ugly (IMHO):
I'm definitely what you would call function-oriented: If a camera
works well I don't concern myself with its looks much. But it does
occur to me that it has to be frustrating to hire a big-name designer
(and presumably pay his big-name fees)
Well, the rumors were pretty much on target.
Here's the Press Release and summary of specifications:
http://www.dpreview.com/news/2012/02/02/Pentax_K-01_announcement#press
Things of interest to me:
No eye level viewfinder and apparently no clip on one either :-(
Compatible with M42 lenses
There it is. K5 sensor, no EVF, $750 body only. $899 including the
40 might be the best deal. It would definitively look better in all
black, and I assume the yellow one is aimed at some market I'm unaware
of. No that exciting , but it's very possible that the IQ is
excellent and it's quiet,
It won't be great in bright light since none of them are. You'll need
to get one of those Delkin hoods. I have one on my E-P2 and it helps
a lot.
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 7:31 AM, Brian Walters apathy...@lyons-ryan.org wrote:
Well, the rumors were pretty much on target.
Here's the Press
Here is a telling shot form dpreview. It really is as big as the K5
for all practical purposes.
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 7:44 AM, Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com wrote:
It won't be great in bright light since none of them are. You'll need
to get one of those Delkin hoods. I have one on my
On 2012-02-02 7:10, Mark Roberts wrote:
Have you read The Design of Everyday Things by Donald Norman? A
classic in the field and it says pretty much what you just did.
http://www.powells.com/biblio/7-9780385267748-4
Excellent book, and the place where I discovered that affordance is a
word,
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 7:55 AM, Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com wrote:
Here is a telling shot form dpreview. It really is as big as the K5
for all practical purposes.
In which case... I don't get it. But I hope they sell lots.
Reading over my shoulder, my husband commented, What are
Nope. Gotta get back to Italy with my wife one of these days...
(slow reply because of deluge at work)
Rick
http://photo.net/photos/RickW
- Original Message -
From: John Coyle jco...@iinet.net.au
To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List' pdml@pdml.net
Cc:
Sent: Sunday, January 29, 2012 9:49
I haven't read all of the specifications yet, so I don't know if
there's a significant improvement in any way, such as a new sensor,
but it looks more like a fashion forward statement rather than a
useful tool. I expect it will look quite dated in a very short period
of time. I guess that's part
On 02/02/2012 1:20 AM, Bob W wrote:
imo it's very rare that a so-called designer ever produces anything other
than hideous crap. There are few exceptions - the Porsche-designed Contax
RTS being what. What they do is not design, but styling. Since form follows
function it requires a real
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 7:46 PM, Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
At least you had the courage to try, Mr. Brooks. Savage's light play work
gives us all something to aspire to.
Paul
Plus, i have to stay up ~well~ past my bed time to do this.:-)
Dave
On Feb 1, 2012, at 5:59 PM,
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 9:15 PM, John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com wrote:
From: Bill Owens
http://www.hlntv.com/video/2012/01/30/sexual-chocolate-beer?hpt=hp_bn13
Bill
I am so happy to see good news coming out of North Carolina for a change.
What do you mean.? I have not been to GFM for 4
Well done set.
Dave
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 8:54 PM, Darren Addy pixelsmi...@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/pixelsmithy/sets/72157629136465149/
They seem to follow a routine. A few more action shots in this batch.
Darren Addy
Kearney, Nebraska
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
Love it
Dave
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 10:11 PM, Walt Gilbert ldott...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I was combing through my archives (as it were) and came across an image and
thought I should get some input on it.
http://www.flickriver.com/photos/walt_gilbert/6804662591/
It was shot with my
It's a slightly modified K-5 without a viewfinder. So now we know
what a good optical viewfinder w/reflex mirror assembly costs, about
$700.
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 7:18 PM, Brian Walters apathy...@lyons-ryan.org wrote:
Quoting Larry Colen l...@red4est.com:
Who cares if the K01 looks like
Hey, Mr. alling, when did you go all ee cummings on us? (;-)
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 9:55 AM, p. j. alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:
It's a slightly modified K-5 without a viewfinder. So now we know
what a good optical viewfinder w/reflex mirror assembly costs, about
$700.
On Wed,
and look at what you're missing, you could have Obama as your President too...
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 7:53 PM, William Robb
anotherdrunken...@gmail.com wrote:
On 01/02/2012 6:43 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
Between the US and the UK, we've fought almost everyone at least once,
including each
Well, I used to write poetry in that style mostly because it was annoying.
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey, Mr. alling, when did you go all ee cummings on us? (;-)
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 9:55 AM, p. j. alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com
wrote:
At your lowest point at the beginning of WWII, we sent you Spam.
That's hard to beat.
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 10:02 AM, p. j. alling
webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, I used to write poetry in that style mostly because it was annoying.
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Steven Desjardins
On 02/02/2012 8:45 AM, p. j. alling wrote:
I expect it will look quite dated in a very short period
of time.
I give it until Feb 8th.
--
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the
On 02/02/2012 8:57 AM, p. j. alling wrote:
and look at what you're missing, you could have Obama as your President too...
Better him than Harper (BTW, we have Prime Ministers).
--
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 4:13 AM, David Savage ozsav...@gmail.com wrote:
This could bring me back to the Pentax fold...
Damn, you're easy.
On 02/02/2012, Jaume Lahuerta jlah...@yahoo.com wrote:
...and it is indeed ugly (IMHO):
Don't know about the authentasy of this, (I'm at work and can't check it out)
http://www.photographyblog.com/news/pentax_k-mount_lens_roadmap/
--
MaritimTim
My private photo blog: http://maritimtim.blogspot.com/
My photo class blog: http://z-fotokurs.blogspot.com/
Looks pretty good:
H.264
1080p
24, 25 or 30 fps
For someone whose use includes a significant amount of video shooting
the K-01 might be very attractive.
--
Mark Roberts - Photography Multimedia
www.robertstech.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Walt, as always you should consider how you view it..
I find the horizontal crop interesting - but prefer the portrait
orientation for the same reason Larry does - what I find distracting is
just the tippy top white blobs as they draw your eye away from the
feather.
what is intersting is that
But it won't autofocus in video mode. That makes it almost useless with
anything other than a wide angle lens.
Paul
On Feb 2, 2012, at 10:37 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Looks pretty good:
H.264
1080p
24, 25 or 30 fps
For someone whose use includes a significant amount of video shooting
the
Not if we'd won instead of drawn you wouldn't but heck, you get what
the government you deserve. God what did we do?
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 10:21 AM, William Robb
anotherdrunken...@gmail.com wrote:
On 02/02/2012 8:57 AM, p. j. alling wrote:
and look at what you're missing, you could have
Well the idea was less about trying to imply a battle to keep the
dress up more an attempt at a tense fashion type pose.
But either way I reckon she did a great job.
Cheers,
Dave
On 2 February 2012 00:27, Bob Sullivan rf.sulli...@gmail.com wrote:
Dave,
You've caught the moment.
I've
Thanks Paul.
This was a rushed lighting set-up (I hadn't really intended to be
shooting) so I fell back on my favorite in case of emergency set-up.
Cheers,
Dave
On 1 February 2012 23:42, Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
Alabaster. Very nice. Well lit.
Paul
On Feb 1, 2012, at
On 2 February 2012 04:49, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
On Feb 1, 2012, at 8:27 AM, Bob Sullivan wrote:
Dave,
You've caught the moment.
I've noticed how the young ladies in fashionable, strapless gowns
spend half the wedding celebration tugging on the front of their dresses.
Can't
You know those big movie cameras they use in Hollywood? They're manual focus.
:-)
DS
On 2 February 2012 23:41, Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
But it won't autofocus in video mode. That makes it almost useless with
anything other than a wide angle lens.
Paul
On Feb 2, 2012,
On 02/02/2012 9:42 AM, p. j. alling wrote:
Not if we'd won instead of drawn you wouldn't but heck, you get what
the government you deserve. God what did we do?
I'm wondering what we did? Canada has always tried to do the right
thing, we don't pick on smaller countries, we help out where we
Having now seen the specs body layout I doubt I'll be returning...
My next camera will most likely be the D800 whenever they bring that out.
DS
On 2 February 2012 23:33, p. j. alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 4:13 AM, David Savage ozsav...@gmail.com wrote:
This
Paul Stenquist wrote:
But it won't autofocus in video mode. That makes it almost useless with
anything other than a wide angle lens.
Funny, I never use anything but manual focus for video. I can't
imagine *wanting* autofocus for video.
--
Mark Roberts - Photography Multimedia
On 2 February 2012 23:51, William Robb anotherdrunken...@gmail.com wrote:
On 02/02/2012 9:42 AM, p. j. alling wrote:
Not if we'd won instead of drawn you wouldn't but heck, you get what
the government you deserve. God what did we do?
I'm wondering what we did? Canada has always tried to do
On 02/02/2012 9:53 AM, David Savage wrote:
It's payback for you picking on all the 'murricas on the PDML.
Karma's a bitch.
I was sure that Knarf was offsetting me with his sucking up all the time.
--
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Feb 2, 2012, at 10:52 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Paul Stenquist wrote:
But it won't autofocus in video mode. That makes it almost useless with
anything other than a wide angle lens.
Funny, I never use anything but manual focus for video. I can't
imagine *wanting* autofocus for video.
On 02/02/2012 9:50 AM, David Savage wrote:
You know those big movie cameras they use in Hollywood? They're manual focus.
Amateurs don't do video the same way pros do. Amateurs tend to do much
longer takes with more (sickeningly bad) attempts at panning or zooming
to follow a moving subject.
On Feb 2, 2012, at 10:50 AM, David Savage wrote:
You know those big movie cameras they use in Hollywood? They're manual focus.
Yes, they are, and I've worked with them on television commercial shoots --
hundreds of times. The director of photography operates the camera, while the
second
On Feb 2, 2012, at 11:00 AM, William Robb wrote:
On 02/02/2012 9:50 AM, David Savage wrote:
You know those big movie cameras they use in Hollywood? They're manual focus.
Amateurs don't do video the same way pros do. Amateurs tend to do much longer
takes with more (sickeningly bad)
Primarly it's a cost savings feature. /Good/ glass viewfinders are
expensive, even good mirror prisms are expensive. With what Pentax
saved on a veiwfinder they could afford a big time designer to give it
his signature treatment. Such as it is...
On 2/2/2012 8:43 AM, Christine Nielsen
On Feb 2, 2012, at 11:10 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
On Feb 2, 2012, at 11:00 AM, William Robb wrote:
On 02/02/2012 9:50 AM, David Savage wrote:
You know those big movie cameras they use in Hollywood? They're manual
focus.
Amateurs don't do video the same way pros do. Amateurs tend to
But it won't autofocus in video mode.
In a thread on PF somebody posted that it does, but I haven't had time
to track down if they were correct or simply talking out their arse.
(If they WERE talking out their arse they possess the main
characteristic needed to be a contributing PDML member).
:)
- Mensaje original -
De: Brian Walters apathy...@lyons-ryan.org
At $750 body only, I'll be taking a close look when it becomes available in
March but I'll really need to be convinced that the LCD screen is usable as
a viewfinder in bright sunlight.
I have had the chance to
On 02/02/2012 10:13 AM, P. J. Alling wrote:
Primarly it's a cost savings feature. /Good/ glass viewfinders are
expensive, even good mirror prisms are expensive. With what Pentax saved
on a veiwfinder they could afford a big time designer to give it his
signature treatment. Such as it is...
On Feb 2, 2012, at 11:29 AM, Darren Addy wrote:
But it won't autofocus in video mode.
In a thread on PF somebody posted that it does, but I haven't had time
to track down if they were correct or simply talking out their arse.
(If they WERE talking out their arse they possess the main
ns I presume Ed said something very bad about the cameraman's deceased
mother, not his own mother :-)
(but I love it when I'm not the only one (besides Brooksie, of course)
who makes these gaffs :-)
ann
On 2/2/2012 11:16, Paul Stenquist wrote:
On Feb 2, 2012, at 11:10 AM, Paul Stenquist
On 02/02/2012 10:10 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
On Feb 2, 2012, at 11:00 AM, William Robb wrote:
On 02/02/2012 9:50 AM, David Savage wrote:
You know those big movie cameras they use in Hollywood? They're manual focus.
Amateurs don't do video the same way pros do. Amateurs tend to do much
On Feb 2, 2012, at 11:36 AM, William Robb wrote:
On 02/02/2012 10:10 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
On Feb 2, 2012, at 11:00 AM, William Robb wrote:
On 02/02/2012 9:50 AM, David Savage wrote:
You know those big movie cameras they use in Hollywood? They're manual
focus.
Amateurs don't do
On 2 February 2012 10:35, Tim Øsleby maritim...@gmail.com wrote:
Don't know about the authentasy of this, (I'm at work and can't check it out)
http://www.photographyblog.com/news/pentax_k-mount_lens_roadmap/
--
MaritimTim
Photographyblog is saying they saw the new Pentax lens roadmap at
I just watched a small portion of an interview of the designer of the
K-01. He mentioned very early on that he had never designed a camera
before. At that point, I decided that my initial suspicions had been
confirmed and watched no further.
If the K-01 was a wristwatch, it would be worn like
On 02/02/2012 10:41 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
I didn't think you'd blocked me.:)
Of coure not :-)
You probably rubberneck car crashes to.
--
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the
DA standard 50mm? I guess someone is confusing with equivalents. Maybe a
DA*31mm 1.8? :-)
DA zoom Limited sounds like a contradiction in terms.
DagT
Den 2. feb. 2012 kl. 17:45 skrev Miserere:
On 2 February 2012 10:35, Tim Øsleby maritim...@gmail.com wrote:
Don't know about the authentasy of
On 02/02/2012 10:45 AM, Miserere wrote:
Focal lengths are approximate and garnered from reading the tea leaves
in the images of the roadmap shown by Photographyblog. I'm sure Pentax
is being vague on purpose, most likely because many of them are
probably not even on the drawing board. The
Yeah my wife fell in love with me when I un-snarelled her Zebco fishing
reel.
And Frank my wife likes your picture too.
Message: 3
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 17:58:34 -0500
From: David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: PESO - The Gentleman
At first I was reading the name in leet, and was going to call it a Koi, but
realized we should take the lead of our friends across the pond and call it
The noughty one.
--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Thu Feb 2 11:45:31 EST 2012
Miserere wrote:
On 2 February 2012 10:35, Tim .sleby maritimtim at gmail.com wrote:
Don't know about the authentasy of this, (I'm at work and can't check
it out)
http://www.photographyblog.com/news/pentax_k-mount_lens_roadmap/
--
MaritimTim
Well Walt IMHO you could post that anywhere without hesitation or
apology and thanks for posting it here.
Message: 4
Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2012 21:11:04 -0600
From: Walt Gilbert ldott...@gmail.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: PESO: Panache
Message-ID:
On Feb 2, 2012, at 7:21 AM, William Robb wrote:
On 02/02/2012 8:57 AM, p. j. alling wrote:
and look at what you're missing, you could have Obama as your President
too...
Better him than Harper (BTW, we have Prime Ministers).
How retro, it seems everything else comes with zooms.
--
I really like this pic, Walt, not only for the lighting, DOF, and composition,
but also for the contrast between the rough, weathered hands and the delicate
feather.
Rick
http://photo.net/photos/RickW
- Original Message -
From: Walt Gilbert ldott...@gmail.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail
Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
On Feb 2, 2012, at 11:29 AM, Darren Addy wrote:
But it won't autofocus in video mode.
In a thread on PF somebody posted that it does, but I haven't had time
to track down if they were correct or simply talking out their arse.
(If they WERE
On Feb 2, 2012, at 12:02 PM, William Robb wrote:
On 02/02/2012 10:41 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
I didn't think you'd blocked me.:)
Of coure not :-)
You probably rubberneck car crashes to.
Too. No, they're not as amusing.
--
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
On Feb 2, 2012, at 12:40 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
On Feb 2, 2012, at 11:29 AM, Darren Addy wrote:
But it won't autofocus in video mode.
In a thread on PF somebody posted that it does, but I haven't had time
to track down if they were
Keeping in mind that it was named by Japanese, the K-01 (Kay-Zero-Wun
in english) would probably be pronounced Kay-Ray-eeCHEE in Japanese.
(Rei being the japanese word for Zero and ichi being the japanese word
for one)
Darren Addy
Kearney, Nebraska
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 11:16 AM, Larry Colen
Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
On Feb 2, 2012, at 12:40 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Well it's been almost 10 years since I last shot video seriously (grad
school) but I always preferred manual focus. Autofocus kept switching
from one point to another when panning static shots - most
I could see the following strategy. Put a really good sensor and
electronics into a minimalist body and sell it as cheap as you can in
a K mount body. Don't worry about size or weather sealing or any of
that stuff. High IQ and low price are the only notable features.
Maybe they were trying for
BTW, I can't find any info on whether this thing will AF with the old
screw drive lenses. Anybody?
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 1:03 PM, Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com wrote:
I could see the following strategy. Put a really good sensor and
electronics into a minimalist body and sell it as
Looks like it's genuine.
http://www.pentaximaging.com/files/pdf/lens_roadmap.pdf
--
MaritimTim
My private photo blog: http://maritimtim.blogspot.com/
My photo class blog: http://z-fotokurs.blogspot.com/
To err is human
On Feb 2, 2012, at 4:31 AM, Brian Walters wrote:
Well, the rumors were pretty much on target.
Here's the Press Release and summary of specifications:
http://www.dpreview.com/news/2012/02/02/Pentax_K-01_announcement#press
Not as good as I'd hoped, nor as bad as I'd feared.
Things of
On 02/02/2012 11:49 AM, Darren Addy wrote:
Keeping in mind that it was named by Japanese, the K-01 (Kay-Zero-Wun
in english) would probably be pronounced Kay-Ray-eeCHEE in Japanese.
(Rei being the japanese word for Zero and ichi being the japanese word
for one)
Why not be honest and pronounce
Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com wrote:
BTW, I can't find any info on whether this thing will AF with the old
screw drive lenses. Anybody?
Yup. Photos show the lens mount does have the screw-drive mechanism.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Nope - the shots of the roadmap show the 50mm lens positioned
right at the join of the 18-50 and 50-135, at a real 50mm.
On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 06:04:57PM +0100, DagT wrote:
DA standard 50mm? I guess someone is confusing with equivalents. Maybe a
DA*31mm 1.8? :-)
DA zoom Limited sounds like
The little hole is to fit an inflation nipple like for a basketball.
Add some air and it turns into a K5.
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 1:12 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
On Feb 2, 2012, at 4:31 AM, Brian Walters wrote:
Well, the rumors were pretty much on target.
Here's the Press
What an odd image! The clarity is wonderful. I find the rendering of
the fingers striking.
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 10:11 PM, Walt Gilbert ldott...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I was combing through my archives (as it were) and came across an image and
thought I should get some input on it.
Wow, you really do live in the sticks.
It is nicely done. BTW
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 7:41 AM, Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
Nice pic. I concur on the crop.
On Feb 1, 2012, at 2:46 AM, Bulent Celasun wrote:
Thank you all, friends.
The cropping suggestions sound good, I
On Feb 2, 2012, at 8:16 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
On Feb 2, 2012, at 11:10 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
On Feb 2, 2012, at 11:00 AM, William Robb wrote:
On 02/02/2012 9:50 AM, David Savage wrote:
You know those big movie cameras they use in Hollywood? They're manual
focus.
Amateurs
Thanks again, Ann!
I see what you mean. My biggest challenge in making more changes is that
I'm not good enough with my software to be able to consistently
replicate the rendering. So, it's going to take some fiddling around,
but I'll keep at it and see what I can do. At this point, I'm kind
On 2/2/2012 8:53 AM, David J Brooks wrote:
Love it
Dave
Thank you, Dave! :)
-- Walt
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 10:11 PM, Walt Gilbertldott...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I was combing through my archives (as it were) and came across an image and
thought I should get some input on it.
On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 12:17:15PM -0500, Igor Roshchin wrote:
Thu Feb 2 11:45:31 EST 2012
Miserere wrote:
2013:
- DA AF RC 1.4x teleconverter
What does RC stand for besides Radio Control?
I'd bet on something like range converter. With in-body SR,
and zoom lenses, a
On 2/2/2012 11:38 AM, Rick Womer wrote:
I really like this pic, Walt, not only for the lighting, DOF, and composition,
but also for the contrast between the rough, weathered hands and the delicate
feather.
Rick
http://photo.net/photos/RickW
Many thanks, Rick!
That contrast between the
i read the press release and watch the linked video interview
http://www.dpreview.com/news/2012/02/02/Pentax_K-01_announcement#press
alas the hype about visual aspects of the design and the reputation of the
designer is front and center, a huge mistake in my view
the interview with Mark
Igor Roshchin wrote:
What does RC stand for besides Radio Control?
Rear Converter
Dario
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
Just dreaming…
Den 2. feb. 2012 kl. 19:25 skrev John Francis:
Nope - the shots of the roadmap show the 50mm lens positioned
right at the join of the 18-50 and 50-135, at a real 50mm.
On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 06:04:57PM +0100, DagT wrote:
DA standard 50mm? I guess someone is confusing with
Thanks, Steven!
My biggest concern about the image was that it might be a bit cliche, so
being odd is a definite (cliche/pun alert!) feather in my cap.
-- Walt
On 2/2/2012 12:30 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
What an odd image! The clarity is wonderful. I find the rendering of
the fingers
On 2/2/2012 11:24 AM, Don Guthrie wrote:
Well Walt IMHO you could post that anywhere without hesitation or
apology and thanks for posting it here.
Thank you, Don!
I appreciate the vote of confidence! :)
-- Walt
Message: 4
Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2012 21:11:04 -0600
From: Walt Gilbert
On Feb 2, 2012, at 12:56 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
On Feb 2, 2012, at 12:40 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Well it's been almost 10 years since I last shot video seriously (grad
school) but I always preferred manual focus. Autofocus kept switching
from
Good news then in regard to long glass. No DFAs to be seen, but I'm not sure
that's a designation that Pentax would use, even if a full frame camera were on
the way. But longer glass and a 50mm lens tend to make one think full frame.
Paul
On Feb 2, 2012, at 1:08 PM, Tim Øsleby wrote:
Looks
Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
Does it offer significant advantages over your K-5 in that regard? Some
additional frame rates is all I recall, but I didn't study the specs.
Yep. 24 fps is a biggie.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 12:05 PM, William Robb
anotherdrunken...@gmail.com wrote:
On 02/02/2012 10:45 AM, Miserere wrote:
Focal lengths are approximate and garnered from reading the tea leaves
in the images of the roadmap shown by Photographyblog. I'm sure Pentax
is being vague on purpose,
On Feb 2, 2012, at 10:42 AM, steve harley wrote:
i read the press release and watch the linked video interview
http://www.dpreview.com/news/2012/02/02/Pentax_K-01_announcement#press
alas the hype about visual aspects of the design and the reputation of the
designer is front and center,
On Feb 2, 2012, at 10:46 AM, Walt Gilbert wrote:
Thanks, Steven!
My biggest concern about the image was that it might be a bit cliche, so
being odd is a definite (cliche/pun alert!) feather in my cap.
Walt,
Being odd isn't a feather in your cap, it's your whole suit.
--
Larry Colen
On 2/2/2012 12:58 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
On Feb 2, 2012, at 10:46 AM, Walt Gilbert wrote:
Thanks, Steven!
My biggest concern about the image was that it might be a bit cliche, so being
odd is a definite (cliche/pun alert!) feather in my cap.
Walt,
Being odd isn't a feather in your cap,
On Feb 2, 2012, at 1:52 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
Does it offer significant advantages over your K-5 in that regard? Some
additional frame rates is all I recall, but I didn't study the specs.
Yep. 24 fps is a biggie.
Yes, that's an advantage
Enough about the K-01, though there is something in common here
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1604247/PESO/PESO%20--%20classic.html
Equipment:: Pentax K20D w/smc Pentax FA 20-35mm f4.0
As usual comments are welcome but may be totally ignored.
--
Don't lose heart! They might want to cut it out,
1 - 100 of 195 matches
Mail list logo
